In post 29, Accountant wrote:Fragger, do you have links to Keyser tunneling on you and being wrong or are you scum who knows he's a good scumhunter and want to meta-deflect in advance?
Why would I care if he's a good scum hunter or not since I'm town?
In post 29, Accountant wrote:Fragger, do you have links to Keyser tunneling on you and being wrong or are you scum who knows he's a good scumhunter and
want to meta-deflect in advance
?
That's quite an accusation (#1).
In post 34, Accountant wrote:VOTE: TheFuzzylogic99
Serious vote; no RVS vote looks to me like a scum
trying to avoid associations by not voting
.
That's quite an accusation (#2).
Keyser what do you make of these accusations?
Also to direct a question you've asked me one game. Why didn't you put a RVS vote on me? I'm slightly offended good sir
In post 29, Accountant wrote:Fragger, do you have links to Keyser tunneling on you and being wrong or are you scum who knows he's a good scumhunter and want to meta-deflect in advance?
Why would I care if he's a good scum hunter or not since I'm town?
Fragger, if you invoke meta on someone, I would like to see some source.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Both scum and town have incentive to throw shit around. Town because it moves the game out of RVS and can force the quiet players out of their shell, scum because they want to setup grounds for a mislynch later or control the momentum of the game.
PEdit: BulletNLynchproof's post gave me an immediate reaction of "this post is town".
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
A lot of quick bandwagons are formed on D1; scum doesn't want to get scrutinized for being on a fishy wagon, or get scrutinized for not being on a popular one. Scum also want to avoid getting associated to their partner in early RVS.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 59, Accountant wrote:A lot of quick bandwagons are formed on D1; scum doesn't want to get scrutinized for being on a fishy wagon, or get scrutinized for not being on a popular one. Scum also want to avoid getting associated to their partner in early RVS.
That's not true...
Scum want to look town and fit in. What do town do day 1? They normally make shit wagons and lynch a townie.
They can also make a new vote on someone, and as it's RVS, it means fuck all.
In post 29, Accountant wrote:Fragger, do you have links to Keyser tunneling on you and being wrong or are you scum who knows he's a good scumhunter and want to meta-deflect in advance?
Why would I care if he's a good scum hunter or not since I'm town?
Fragger, if you invoke meta on someone, I would like to see some source.
What sources? Not understanding what you're trying to make a reach at here Accountant.
Hasn't done much scumhunting so far; been IIOAing, answering rhetorical questions, commenting on posts rather than actually contributing.
I'm not scum hunting in the first 2 pages of the game
Get out of here! XD
We have already moved mostly out of the RVS stage. What do you think about:
- My accusations?
- Fraggernaut's refusal to give sources for his meta claim about Keyser?
- Fuzzylogic's reluctancy to RVS?
- Keyser Soze's analysis of my posts?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 59, Accountant wrote:A lot of quick bandwagons are formed on D1; scum doesn't want to get scrutinized for being on a fishy wagon, or get scrutinized for not being on a popular one. Scum also want to avoid getting associated to their partner in early RVS.
So who do you think is "Associated" so far from RVS?
Hasn't done much scumhunting so far; been IIOAing, answering rhetorical questions, commenting on posts rather than actually contributing.
I'm not scum hunting in the first 2 pages of the game
Get out of here! XD
We have already moved mostly out of the RVS stage. What do you think about:
- My accusations?
- Fraggernaut's refusal to give sources for his meta claim about Keyser?
- Fuzzylogic's reluctancy to RVS?
- Keyser Soze's analysis of my posts?
Accountant your claims are far reaches. If you really wanted to dive into meta, you could read my past games.
In post 29, Accountant wrote:Fragger, do you have links to Keyser tunneling on you and being wrong or are you scum who knows he's a good scumhunter and want to meta-deflect in advance?
Why would I care if he's a good scum hunter or not since I'm town?
Fragger, if you invoke meta on someone, I would like to see some source.
What sources? Not understanding what you're trying to make a reach at here Accountant.
You said Keyser would tunnel you early D1 and probably be wrong about your alignment. Why do you think he will tunnel you? If it was due to his behavior in previous games, can you link those games?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 59, Accountant wrote:A lot of quick bandwagons are formed on D1; scum doesn't want to get scrutinized for being on a fishy wagon, or get scrutinized for not being on a popular one. Scum also want to avoid getting associated to their partner in early RVS.
That's not true...
Scum want to look town and fit in. What do town do day 1? They normally make shit wagons and lynch a townie.
They can also make a new vote on someone, and as it's RVS, it means fuck all.
If we allow the anti town behavior of not participating in RVS to pass by as null, then plenty of scum can refuse to vote and not get suspected. Furthermore, the shit wagons d1 give us a lot of information, so it is not completely pointless.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 59, Accountant wrote:A lot of quick bandwagons are formed on D1; scum doesn't want to get scrutinized for being on a fishy wagon, or get scrutinized for not being on a popular one. Scum also want to avoid getting associated to their partner in early RVS.
So who do you think is "Associated" so far from RVS?
Keyser Soze and Fraggernaut
Vedith and BulletNLynchproof
Keyser Soze with myself
Fuzzylogic with myself
All of these people have had meaningful interactions that provides information for town.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 63, Accountant wrote:We have already moved mostly out of the RVS stage. What do you think about:
- My accusations?
- Fraggernaut's refusal to give sources for his meta claim about Keyser?
- Fuzzylogic's reluctancy to RVS?
- Keyser Soze's analysis of my posts?
-I don't agree with them
-I don't think you understand the word 'refusal'
-I think you are scratching the walls
-Keyser has sense, but that doesn't indicate his align.
With the petty concerns you have here though, I'm thinking town, as your concerns in our last game were just as petty (or incorrect).
In post 59, Accountant wrote:A lot of quick bandwagons are formed on D1; scum doesn't want to get scrutinized for being on a fishy wagon, or get scrutinized for not being on a popular one. Scum also want to avoid getting associated to their partner in early RVS.
That's not true...
Scum want to look town and fit in. What do town do day 1? They normally make shit wagons and lynch a townie.
They can also make a new vote on someone, and as it's RVS, it means fuck all.
If we allow the anti town behavior of not participating in RVS to pass by as null, then plenty of scum can refuse to vote and not get suspected. Furthermore, the shit wagons d1 give us a lot of information, so it is not completely pointless.
So accountant do you find inattentiveness to the game scum aligned?
Pedit: So you think I would RVS a scum buddy early game? Or do you think Keyser & myself are town? Or is it one & one?
In post 67, Accountant wrote:If we allow the anti town behavior of not participating in RVS to pass by as null, then plenty of scum can refuse to vote and not get suspected. Furthermore, the shit wagons d1 give us a lot of information, so it is not completely pointless.
A good scum will blend in with looking bad town, that's all I'm saying.
I see what you are trying to get at. But honestly for me, I'm neither for or against RVS.
RVS is purely there to get the game rolling in my opinion, nothing more, nothing less. If people participate without a vote, then I don't care if they join RVS.
Fragger: I think inattentiveness to the game needs to be punished so that scum do not use it as a way to bog down games.
Also, where is the links I asked for? If you don't want to give them, what is your reason?
Finally, I think there is a connection between you and Keyser. Whether Town and Town or scum pre-emptively discrediting a town member or something else remains to be seen. But now we know to watch out for further interactions between the two of you.
Vedith: I agree a good scum will do that. There is no guarunted that fuzzylogic is a good scum.
If Fraggernaut did not refuse to give sources for his claim about Keyser, then what is he doing? I've asked twice and he has not given them, that counts as refusing in my book.
PEdit: Vedith, explain your reasoning for "No."
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 73, Accountant wrote:Fragger: I think inattentiveness to the game needs to be punished so that scum do not use it as a way to bog down games.
Also, where is the links I asked for? If you don't want to give them, what is your reason?
Finally, I think there is a connection between you and Keyser. Whether Town and Town or scum pre-emptively discrediting a town member or something else remains to be seen. But now we know to watch out for further interactions between the two of you.
Vedith: I agree a good scum will do that. There is no guarunted that fuzzylogic is a good scum.
If Fraggernaut did not refuse to give sources for his claim about Keyser, then what is he doing? I've asked twice and he has not given them, that counts as refusing in my book.
PEdit: Vedith, explain your reasoning for "No."
I already told you. If you're so interested in meta, go look at my past games. Simple as that.
I don't feel inclined to post links to past games for someone else's attempt to meta bury someone.
