It's the way it was done by being a complete sheep with no logic behind it.
Logic comprises of premises and a conclusion. Observe:
1. Fraggernaut has been making contentless and fluffy posts.
2. People who make contentless and fluffy posts are usually scum.
3. Fraggernaut is scum.
Which of these 3 statements are you arguing with and claiming is bad logic?
The fact that this claim of me "not providing content" was the exact same thing I said to you which is a association I make between yourself & Bullet, which in turn leads to All Alone.
Are you proposing that, I, as scum, was accused of fluffing by you, and my scum buddy Bullet picked up on that and accused YOU of fluffing for reasons I cannot fathom, and my second scum buddy All Alone decided to sheep him, and then I decided to sheep
her
, leading to all three scum on a town wagon on page 8? Is that what you think happened? Thus that was hypocritical, cause All Alone claims I haven't pushed any of my scum reads; which ironically they haven't either.
So you do not deny that you haven't pushed any of your scum reads before All Alone called you out on it?
Fraggernaut, I think post 198 was extremely, extremely defensive. You repeatedly attack Bullet and All Alone to the extent of even going to draw pre-flip associations between them and me, then claim they are merely "scum leans". From the way you were talking, I would have expected you to list us three as confirmed scum. I think that RC has struck gold in her D1 accusations again.
moar votes on fragger plz
K thanks.
