You can quickly go through all of someone's topics, pick put all their games, ISO the first several posts and compare it to their alignment, and draw a conclusion about how someone plays RVS as scum vs town.
There is no good or evil. There is only fun and boring.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
I find it difficult to believe that you've come up with meaningful meta tells at this point in a game. I suspect you rather put this up to see how I'd react.
In post 51, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:You can quickly go through all of someone's topics, pick put all their games, ISO the first several posts and compare it to their alignment, and draw a conclusion about how someone plays RVS as scum vs town.
In post 46, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:Im getting a gut scumread from Persivul. I checked it against his meta and it checks out.
UNVOTE: Guilty VOTE: Persivul
Serious vote.
Discuss.
Discuss what?
You have pot pointed out exactly what it is that you find scummy with his RVS posting. What do you mean with semi-pointless questions? Almost everything in RVS is semi-pointless if you ask me. What does your meta dive say town persivul acts like?
In post 51, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:You can quickly go through all of someone's topics, pick put all their games, ISO the first several posts and compare it to their alignment, and draw a conclusion about how someone plays RVS as scum vs town.
I just checked your first post on page 3 in every game you've played, and each one of them was moronic.
So, this moronic post is not alignment indicative.
'She made someone haul a rack up eight flights of stairs and down six more, just to dry tablecloths?'
'A very determined woman, your great-grandmother.'
In post 25, A Simple Plan wrote:@Vedith: What's the point of setup spec so early in the game? What do you hope to accomplish from discussing what the mod may or may not have thrown at us other than WIFOM?
Why are you against giving this information? Is it because you didn't want people to know you have day chat?
And for the record, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between my scum or town game.
So you're dodging my question?
It's not that I'm against giving the information, but how does previous game spec really relate, even if they're the same theme? If I were to run a Harry Potter theme, I could see Harry as 2-shot Deathproof, I could see Harry as a Vig, I could see him as a Follower (seeker)... My point is, what's to say anything is to be similar or the same?
sorry, been busy with work (and Fallout ) and neglected this game for too long!
In post 46, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:Im getting a gut scumread from Persivul. I checked it against his meta and it checks out.
Can you explain what specifically in his meta is indicative of scum alignment?
In post 54, Persivul wrote:I find it difficult to believe that you've come up with meaningful meta tells at this point in a game. I suspect you rather put this up to see how I'd react.
This feels a little guarded to me, and
In post 55, Persivul wrote:So, you need to post some specifics if you really think there's merit to the charge.
reads like you'd rather dismiss his push than engage with it.
In post 59, FA_Q2 wrote:On an unrelated to the game note - you are in the same location as I am. Small world.
awesome, I love it here
Gut townleans on Fire/FA_Q2 at the moment, but I don't have much beyond that. This ASP/Vedith thread could be informative but I want to watch it resolve itself before I jump in with my opinions.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: A Simple Plan
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
It's more about the way you phrased it. You presented a counterexample to several hypotheses that were never explicitly stated (you were playful this game, playful!Persivul = scum!Persivul), and then hit him with "you need to justify it better". By "engage with it" I mean question it, or ask him to explain.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"