In post 1849, hiplop wrote:etl's kill + lynch + factional night kill?
Oh I thought you meant during the night.
In post 1849, hiplop wrote:etl's kill + lynch + factional night kill?
In post 1851, hiplop wrote:yea. thats why I think no lynch here actually makes sense.
usually rigourously oppose them but this is exception
In post 1845, farside22 wrote:In post 1844, Ankamius wrote:In post 1833, farside22 wrote:In post 1832, Vedith wrote:Can you point me to his claim?
In post 1756, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm a modified backup; I can use it before a lynch and I will backup the lynched player before they die. My information on hip-hop is not related to this; I said that it was mine in order to absorb a nightkill, but hiplop and massive are still town regardless.
Add that he didn't go anywhere and he knows that hippy is town because of his role.
Farside, are you scum?
No.
Is there really a point to the question or are you going to explain why I'm wrong or what I"m missing with what you quote.
In post 1854, Ankamius wrote:In post 1845, farside22 wrote:In post 1844, Ankamius wrote:In post 1833, farside22 wrote:In post 1832, Vedith wrote:Can you point me to his claim?
In post 1756, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm a modified backup; I can use it before a lynch and I will backup the lynched player before they die. My information on hip-hop is not related to this; I said that it was mine in order to absorb a nightkill, but hiplop and massive are still town regardless.
Add that he didn't go anywhere and he knows that hippy is town because of his role.
Farside, are you scum?
No.
Is there really a point to the question or are you going to explain why I'm wrong or what I"m missing with what you quote.
Your response to Nacho doesn't make sense and I'm getting scum-push vibes from the way you're going about it.
In post 1853, farside22 wrote:In post 1851, hiplop wrote:yea. thats why I think no lynch here actually makes sense.
usually rigourously oppose them but this is exception
me too.
Can you tell me one thing because I'm really confused.
Why does nacho's claim make sense to you?
Or does it make sense?
In post 1857, Ankamius wrote:I don't understand your case. Nacho said his Hiplop read had nothing to do with his role.
In post 1859, hiplop wrote:In post 1853, farside22 wrote:In post 1851, hiplop wrote:yea. thats why I think no lynch here actually makes sense.
usually rigourously oppose them but this is exception
me too.
Can you tell me one thing because I'm really confused.
Why does nacho's claim make sense to you?
Or does it make sense?
im scared im wrong about nacho.
still inkling that hes scum, but ya
In post 1860, farside22 wrote:In post 1857, Ankamius wrote:I don't understand your case. Nacho said his Hiplop read had nothing to do with his role.
He was scum reading hippy day 2.
He said he knew hippy was town due to his role.
He said he went nowhere.
Dear lord do I need to draw a map here?
In post 1862, Ankamius wrote:In post 1860, farside22 wrote:In post 1857, Ankamius wrote:I don't understand your case. Nacho said his Hiplop read had nothing to do with his role.
He was scum reading hippy day 2.
He said he knew hippy was town due to his role.
He said he went nowhere.
Dear lord do I need to draw a map here?
Did you forget the post where he said he said that it was his role to absorb a nightkill?
In post 1866, Ankamius wrote:In post 1862, Ankamius wrote:In post 1860, farside22 wrote:In post 1857, Ankamius wrote:I don't understand your case. Nacho said his Hiplop read had nothing to do with his role.
He was scum reading hippy day 2.
He said he knew hippy was town due to his role.
He said he went nowhere.
Dear lord do I need to draw a map here?
Did you forget the post where he said he said that it was his role to absorb a nightkill?
uhhhh let me rephrase this so that it makes any sense whatsoever.
Did you forget the post where he said that the information was because of his role so that he could absorb a nightkill?
In post 1756, Nachomamma8 wrote:My information on hip-hop is not related to this
In post 1756, Nachomamma8 wrote:I said that it was mine in order to absorb a nightkill
In post 1868, Ankamius wrote:In post 1756, Nachomamma8 wrote:My information on hip-hop is not related to this
In post 1756, Nachomamma8 wrote:I said that it was mine in order to absorb a nightkill
In post 1805, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 1803, Thor665 wrote:I find Davsto's play in regards to Nacho terrible, but it actually looks kind of townish due to how terrible it is.
Ank continues to do and say nothing - people continue to act like the slot is town.
The wagons are all being very knee jerk mob rule based off random mob rule attitudes - I do not think that is good for the town. We have one dead scum and three dead town, and people are acting like somehow we're in PoE hoo-hah land? I feel like I've learned to play a different game then everyone else.
Vote: Farside
this is quite possibly the scummiest post I've ever seen you make in all the games we've had together.
In post 1806, massive wrote:The two commutes are complementary and therefore have to be the same team -- otherwise if Mother / Norma was town, why wouldn't she just commute herself every night? No, the wording of the ability makes it sound much more like the two can coordinate the ability.
In post 1811, Nachomamma8 wrote:The answer to your first question is "OK" and the answer to your second question is "I thought Cata going from a very big scum read to a barely-mentioned one was strange, but feel less strongly about the point now that I see you mentioned Cat in an earlier post today".
In post 1811, Nachomamma8 wrote:Why?
In post 1811, Nachomamma8 wrote:Why did you stop voting me?