In post 96, DiamondSentinel wrote:I can't talk about my other games besides my first. Check out Antihero v. Fakegod if you want to see my playstyle. That's my only finished one.
I want you to talk about this game.
In post 96, DiamondSentinel wrote:I can't talk about my other games besides my first. Check out Antihero v. Fakegod if you want to see my playstyle. That's my only finished one.
In post 101, itlepip wrote:FTR there is a 25% chance a wagon with 3 people on it will not contain scum, so saying that it probably will contain scum doesn't provide any real insight into the game.
Also it is nice that someone has filled the next policy lynch slot...
In post 102, lilith2013 wrote:I believe I've read through one or two of his games, which gave me a general idea of how he behaves and his posting style. As I only have one finished game onsite, I doubt anyone would know enough about me to know my playstyle.
What kind of play would lead you to form a legitimate reason to vote someone you'd never played with before?
In post 107, DiamondSentinel wrote:Absolutely nothing. It's RVS, and I can't really concentrate at this point.
In post 109, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 102, lilith2013 wrote:I believe I've read through one or two of his games, which gave me a general idea of how he behaves and his posting style. As I only have one finished game onsite, I doubt anyone would know enough about me to know my playstyle.
What kind of play would lead you to form a legitimate reason to vote someone you'd never played with before?
I'm pretty sure he saw the game where I was in with you. So yeah, even after 1 game you can pick up peoples traits. I personally disagree, but some people like to see a persons first few pages of a game, compare it to another of theirs and judge. But I think we have hit base enough of who knows what, who can and can't be wrong etc etc etc.
Do you really think that saying it in a game is beneficial?
Hey guys, if you do 'this' I will call you scum, if you do 'that' I will say town...
-Vedith
why apricity over not_mafiaIn post 93, The_Jester wrote:Well since I'm town, I think we should lynch Apricity.
@Apricity, are you scum? Just admit it, you'll feel all fresh and relieved after all.
In post 111, lilith2013 wrote:I was actually asking from a theory standpoint. I usually struggle to form reads D1.
In post 112, DiamondSentinel wrote:Fine, someone do a TL;DR for me. I'm a bit stressed on time.
In post 115, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 113, Sharky5x wrote:why apricity over not_mafia
Do you have a view on NM?
-Vedith
In post 113, Sharky5x wrote:why apricity over not_mafiaIn post 93, The_Jester wrote:Well since I'm town, I think we should lynch Apricity.
@Apricity, are you scum? Just admit it, you'll feel all fresh and relieved after all.
In post 104, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 101, itlepip wrote:FTR there is a 25% chance a wagon with 3 people on it will not contain scum, so saying that it probably will contain scum doesn't provide any real insight into the game.
Also it is nice that someone has filled the next policy lynch slot...
Going by % wise is always stupid.
It's how something is done rather than odds.
Otherwise
Odds are that we lynch town today and tomorrow over scum - Doesn't work.
-Vedith
>(re)read first 4 pagesIn post 118, DiamondSentinel wrote:I forgot about this game until I got the PM, and I'm having a hard time getting in to it.
In post 119, The_Jester wrote:In post 113, Sharky5x wrote:why apricity over not_mafiaIn post 93, The_Jester wrote:Well since I'm town, I think we should lynch Apricity.
@Apricity, are you scum? Just admit it, you'll feel all fresh and relieved after all.
Cause Not_Mafia's not mafia. Duh.
I'm gonna swiftly escape the Diego wagon to avoid suspicion now.
VOTE: Diamond
Smooth.
In post 118, DiamondSentinel wrote:I'm sorry about this, MOHIS, but I /in'd a while back when I was dead in my only game. tbh, I forgot about this game until I got the PM, and I'm having a hard time getting in to it.