In post 483, Nosferatu wrote:Finished reading up, LaHo is probably scum, don't necessarily see Titus's reasons for it.
pip looks a lot better.
not liking lhix; I'm having trouble reading his sudden mood swings, feels like I'm listening to a girl on her period
idk how I feel about Titus v Farside looks kind of TvT to me
would like for mala pig and kop to post more
Aqua and Yakko read town to me.
Even assuming Nos was concerned by your observation (considering neither you nor anyone else followed it up IIRC this is not necessarily true) I don't think anybody says "Nosferatu is coaching Malakittens... and Pignash... and Pisskop". Both on the grounds that it's totally possible to conceal one scumbuddy among three targets, and that it would be ridiculous for Nos to "coach" Mala and Pisskop.
Aqua, I said NoS was coaching LoHa telling him to scumhunt. NoS, seeing I perceived that, is highly unlikely to repeat that his buddy needs to post more. It's not about whether the assessment is true but rather him avoiding links.
In post 676, Titus wrote:Aqua, I said NoS was coaching LoHa telling him to scumhunt. NoS, seeing I perceived that, is highly unlikely to repeat that his buddy needs to post more. It's not about whether the assessment is true but rather him avoiding links.
I don't think there was anything much *to* say about Pisskop, Pig or Mala at that point besides "I wish they'd post more". In fact, if there was nothing but that to say about a scumbuddy, concealing it within a group of similar townies is pretty much exactly how I'd expect it to be said.
I'm not arguing Pisskop or Mala are likely scum but the point's weak.
In post 680, Aquanim wrote:Let's not get into that, shall we?
I'm sure we both have all sorts of uncomplimentary things to say about the other's play.
I wasn't trying to make this personal but just asking for your vote because I was right before and you were wrong. Your vote should help sort Farside and show who is right or wrong.
I guess you missed the part where that was mostly a play for information...
Ugh. The fact of the matter is Titus, if we're going to have this conversation I can't help but make it personal, because my entire opinion here is personal about you. If you want to go into that, we can.
I'd prefer not to since I'm town, you almost have to be town, and so it's a complete waste of time which will shit up the thread. We can do it somewhere and someplace else, instead of inflicting it on everyone else who has to read it.
In post 680, Aquanim wrote:Let's not get into that, shall we?
I'm sure we both have all sorts of uncomplimentary things to say about the other's play.
I wasn't trying to make this personal but just asking for your vote because I was right before and you were wrong. Your vote should help sort Farside and show who is right or wrong.
I'm Mason
Gfu
Now tell me how you think your weak point was valid
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Just going to say this I still say Titus point was weak and wrong.
But I don't know what to think with nos flip.
I think the best point is Soren's vote on loha as bussing.
Vote: Soren
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.
In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.
The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.
In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.
True......but sometimes not true.
Just my weird mussing
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.
In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.
I can half see what your saying about the SK, but bringing out the Vigilante role out in the open uneases me, and if the vigilante comes forward, how can we prove that he is the vigilante and not a SK?
Titus, will understand the stance of what happened with that, in the first blitz game.
