In post 1070, Persivul wrote:Well, persivul day was a bust. With Max out I believe it's Ranger day today.
.................Yeah..........
In post 1071, duppin wrote:Taly, I just don't really have anything to add at the moment. I've already said what I think about Errant and Persivul. I think Persivul is most likely scum, the fact that he is still posting yet ignoring your questions is pretty weird as well.
It sucks that Maxwell is getting replaced, but I really want to speak with that slot.
I don't know about Ranger. The thing is you guys keep saying that me and Ranger have to be scum together for it to make sense, so I know this is not the case. That means if me and Ranger are both town, the team would be Persivul, Maxwell and Errant/Brunneis. I am townreading Errant at the moment, but this might turn out to be a mistake if Brunneis isn't scum. In either case Errant, my answer to your question about the best lynch, I believe now that the lynch should be between Persivul and Maxwell's slot.
Not sure about Klingons head exactly
But Pers is now becoming close to null for me.
Though, I do question you and Ranger - whether you'd both be scum together and the other isn't just really townreading the other or WKing.
Tbh, I don't know where either of your townreads come from, other than "they're posting like town."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Since it's "Ranger Day"
I had a post typed up responding to a few posts Ranger posted the other day and I want to bring that up.
In post 1036, Ranger wrote:Easy. Your posting, both heads, looked like town.Brunneis wrote:A better question would be - what about Duppin VS Me seems like a TvT to you?But your points against duppin didn't hold water.duppin's posting looks like town. And while his stance is reasonable, ultimately, I don't think his scumread on you is correct. Thus, TvT.
What do you mean by my points "didn't hold water"?
In post 1054, Ranger wrote:Iso me. 49, 233, 259, 287, 411, 459, 467, 474, 514, 515, 516, 557, 570, 591, 701, 775, 862, 928, 934, 936, 945, 948, 949, 1024, and 1036.Brunneis wrote:@Ranger You spent all of Day1 and the first bit of Day2 voting for Errant. Please refresh our memories and tell us why. Do you still suspect Errant? Why or why not?
Maybe I should've linked you to my posts thatdon'tmention Errant in a negative light; that'd probably have been shorter.
I keep looking at these posts and I'm not exactly sure how you're not mentioning Errant in a negative light?
Quite a few of them consist of either you putting her as a scumread 49 411 459 474, wagon speculating in the sense that he might be scum 233 259 514, 515, and 516, you placing your vote on him and saying "nothing has changed" 467, and you saying you were the main force against Errant and wanted his wagon to continue further. 287
Also, from post 557 to 637 - we had our little 1v1 here. The next 200 posts you're on Persivul's wagon.
862 is where you ask "where the errant wagon is" right before you go onto Gray's.
This has been my train of thought looking at most of your ISO so far.... I really don't know what you mean by your suspicion of Errant - or where it came from exactly, and furthermore - why you didn't answer Klingon(the other head) on whether you STILL suspect Errant or not.
I also note that back in D1; I did ask you your reasoning against Errant, but you didn't really engage with reasoning, and said you'd get to it later 190
I'm still not exactly sure from all of what you've said in 514 to 516 - would warrant a strong scumread for nearly most of the game as it has here, especially since you haven't really engaged with Ranger much at all in this.
So... there's my thinking; What do you think about Errant's recent posts in general? Are they still scum to you?
~Taly
