In post 224, Elyse wrote:In post 210, TheLhix wrote:In post 208, Elyse wrote:I asked you a yes or no question and you responded with a big long post that discredits your reads as weak. That reads as backtracking to me because you didn't want to take a hard stance.
Please then, tell me where in that post I did not answer your question to the T. I made it detailed to give you and exact representation of my mind. Nor did I once backtrack and deny anything or any of my past actions. Tell me how it is not cohesive to all of my reads and motives.
You answered my question in a very roundabout, indirect way. Basically, I asked if the scumslip you were referring to was keyser's reaction to your scumclaim, and you said, to sum it up, "yes but it's pretty much a null tell" which makes no sense. A) scumslips are black and white B) for him to be scummy due to the scumslip, you would also have to be scum.
In post 211, TheLhix wrote:In post 208, Elyse wrote:I asked you a yes or no question and you responded with a big long post that discredits your reads as weak. That reads as backtracking to me because you didn't want to take a hard stance.
And on that note. With my motives being spoken plainly, why dont you want detail?
Your detail was unhelpful. You shrouded your "yes" with a bunch of fluff that weakened your stance and makes it easier for you to abandon your read on keyser.
In post 213, Zoronos wrote:In post 207, Mathilda wrote:Could you explain what exactly the scumslip is please because I didn't pick up on it. Thanks.
I don't know what it is. That's part of why I'm trying to get the players involved to talk about it.
I'd very much like Elyse to weigh in, since her questioning provoked the exchange.
What I see the "scumslip" as is this post:
which is in reaction to TheLhix claiming scum with keyser.
If keyser is town, he knows that TheLhix is lying, either in a joking manner or a reaction test or something. It would make sense for him to brush it off because he knows it's not true and not worth engaging.
It reads more as keyser being TheLhix's scumbuddy and being like, "are you really that inexperienced that you would claim scum with me on day 1?" That's what RC meant and why I am townreading him because I read it the same way.
I'm not sure it's a scumslip but it's something to note if keyser or TheLhix ever flips.
That's also why I questioned TheLhix about the slip because if he's pushing keyser as scum for that, he would also have to be scum.
I will be more blunt if my style of writing isnt to your liking.
The exact reason I am even mildly scumreading Keyser atm was how he took my bait, you have that correct. But, the reason why I said it was "pretty much a null tell" is because I don't think it is fully incriminating in the fullest regard, it is something significant dont mistake me for that, and i am fully aware of the the road of damage it puts me on if he does flip accordingly, I willingly accept it. My only reason for the Null with scumlean was because of the chances for new analysis. I even openly admitted that my earlier votes were false and bluffy for this purpose. I hope that explains better what my words meant, (I also hope you dont take it the wrong way as if I am trying to act superior over you, I've had that happen a few times)
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Response to what I bolded and enlarged.