Mini 1741: Day 3

TheLhix · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:54 pm

In post 249, TheLhix wrote:
In post 248, Zulfy wrote:
In post 243, TheLhix wrote:My response to that is the same as it has been, when I did all of my action for the purpose specified

What purpose specified? I guess I missed it.

My purpose was to move us out of RVS. I have said this over a thousand times. I didnt derail any momentum as I acted independently before that. I have even told you what pages and how far back it was, you are puling this straight out of a hat. I did this before you "got us out of RVS"

I even stated that the original claim was to go after the mainstage hatewagon candidate and pull a reaction so we could have something comprehensive to analyze. We had nothing but random malarkey of the RVS stage before it. This was around P. 3-5 I urge you to reread

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:54 pm

In post 241, Zulfy wrote:Sometimes there is. Why do it? Why tell us you did it? +1

I didn't use confirmable randomization
I used regular randomization, why? Idk was bored
Why did I tell people? Was kinda hopin somebody would have voted me for it or at least question me. Helps me figure out who's being inquisitive and who isn't

Zulfy · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:57 pm

^ Oh so like what I was doing. And Lhix too, sorta.
Fair enough.

Zulfy · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:58 pm

But uhhh why not just jump into what was already there and try to start your own thing? Kinda like what Lhix was doing...

Zulfy · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:58 pm

TheLhix · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:59 pm

Zulfy I have a question, if you are using Math's post as a argument, then how does that counteract the actions of either one of us?

Zulfy · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:01 pm

I'm not using it as an argument Lhix. Just commenting that Mathilda handled that attack well.
I'll use line breaks from now on.

TheLhix · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:03 pm

In post 256, Zulfy wrote:I'm not using it as an argument Lhix. Just commenting that Mathilda handled that attack well.
I'll use line breaks from now on.

Ah. Thanks.

Then what is the supposed difference between the motivations behind both of our early actions? I've been claiming mine from the very beginning that P.5 Burst us into something deeper to look at, past what was happening prior.

TheLhix · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:05 pm

Going away for a few hours. Something urgent has come up. Will read anything when I come back.

Zulfy · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:15 pm

That mine happened first, basically. Yours therefore looked like an attempt to derail whatever momentum was building (I can't be sure of anything that would have happened, but whatever if would have been, you derailed it.) Jake from State Farm did the same thing, just not as dramatically as you.

Elyse · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:03 pm

@Zoronos

I could see Zulfy or Frozen scum based on VCA. Zulfy has stayed off the wagon whilst not opposing it and frozen was the counterwagon. So if keyser were to flip town, frozen could be scum for that reason.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:17 pm

Elyse literally has not managed to make one post that hasn't triggered my scumdar.

VOTE: Elyse

Zulfy · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:26 pm

In post 260, Elyse wrote:I could see Zulfy or Frozen scum based on VCA.

VCA=vote count? What does this mean? Also could you actually lay out your attacks on me?

RC, I can't see why you would think that +1

Zulfy · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:27 pm

I don't think I've addressed this, Keyser has absolutely not made any sort of scumslip and there's absolutely zero reason to suspect him of anything at the moment.

Garmr · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:54 pm

In post 261, RadiantCowbells wrote:Elyse literally has not managed to make one post that hasn't triggered my scumdar.

VOTE: Elyse

Sorry to say this rc but I can see where Elyse is coming from and I'm of similar mind at the moment. I don't agree with Elyse's Vc through but I can see how someone could gett there.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:55 pm

What the fuck do you even mean Garmr?

This isn't about what she said it's about how she said it's about the fact that she's discussing that and in that fashion.

Garmr · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:12 pm

In post 265, RadiantCowbells wrote:What the fuck do you even mean Garmr?

This isn't about what she said it's about how she said it's about the fact that she's discussing that and in that fashion.

Being a hypocrite doesn't make one scum

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:13 pm

OH MY GOD DUDE WHAT ARE YOU SAYING

Garmr · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:16 pm

In post 267, RadiantCowbells wrote:OH MY GOD DUDE WHAT ARE YOU SAYING

What are you saying break it down in short readable English

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:23 pm

Is she your mason buddy or something?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:24 pm

Like, I never fully fleshed out the thought.

You decided to jump to conclusions of what my reason for the vote was and hard defend her for it.

You don't even know why the fuck I was scumreading her and you just decided to invent your own reason and refute it.

Garmr · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:30 pm

In post 270, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, I never fully fleshed out the thought.

You decided to jump to conclusions of what my reason for the vote was and hard defend her for it.

You don't even know why the fuck I was scumreading her and you just decided to invent your own reason and refute it.

That's not the response you're supposed to give me but I want to ask why respond like that when it's obvious we have a misunderstanding. Wtf dude

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:32 pm

Why are you so resolved to defend Elyse?

You didn't hear my reasons and you were already dead set on defending her.

Zoronos · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:33 pm

@RC / Garmr
I have no idea what the two of you are discussing.

VOTE: InputPrimary

Garmr · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:55 pm

In post 272, RadiantCowbells wrote:Why are you so resolved to defend Elyse?

You didn't hear my reasons and you were already dead set on defending her.

I thought you were attacking her reasoni g which was similar to mine I don't get why you didn't try to clear the misunderstanding first instead of what ever the fuck that was