In post 499, Hinduragi wrote:That's literally all I wanted. Them not being scum together is exactly why I'm comfortable hopping on your wagon. It wasn't a scum wagon at all nor was it "scumteam-motivated" because at least 2/3 were town.
Well actually imo only 1/3 is town for me. Plus when I say scum pushed, it can easily be by just 1.
I know you can't read me and I've come to accept that you won't ever be able to. That's why I'm trying to make it easy on you and let you know that it's 2/3. Even if I'm scum, at least I'm not lying to you here, right?
Spell it out for me in alphabet soup.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
In post 502, Hinduragi wrote:I know you can't read me and I've come to accept that you won't ever be able to. That's why I'm trying to make it easy on you and let you know that it's 2/3. Even if I'm scum, at least I'm not lying to you here, right?
Spell it out for me in alphabet soup.
Even if you are scum? Well say you and Soren were scum, it's 1/3 not scum on the wagon, not 2/3. So I don't understand what your argument is here?
I think giving my reason would be silly right now.
2/3 town on the wagon. Even if I'm scum, I'd say the same thing. Have you been this confused about all of my posts because you seem to be misunderstanding even the most basic of them.
Why's that?
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
In post 504, Hinduragi wrote:2/3 town on the wagon. Even if I'm scum, I'd say the same thing. Have you been this confused about all of my posts because you seem to be misunderstanding even the most basic of them.
Why's that?
Well it's actually more of an irrelevant comment from yourself. It's not a case of what you will say as scum, but more what the odds actually are for me and others for scum to be on the wagon (imo that's 1/3 ate town).
Keeping in mind, my argument was that scum pushed for me, not how many scum were on my wagon and how many town were, you decided to add that for, well who knows. o.0
In post 403, Hinduragi wrote:Not liking CN honestly. ISO him and you'll see. Calling for Soren lynch, no vote. Still going off it today. Why? Because vigshot. "if it helps im not guilty" yes, but I think you're likely third party without a kill and don't want to participate in this game anymore.
Vote: CN
Why would you vote your own confirmed not-mafia if you believe that I'm a useless 3rd party with no impact on the game?
TBH I have little interest in setup spec across the board and that's the majority of discussion that's taking place. I imagine these types of games just aren't for me. Reads are hard to get because of the sheer amount of statistics and card-alignment-role type logic being used. I feel stupid for trying to scumhunt in an environment like this when nobody else is really doing that based hardcore on reactions and vote counts, instead preferring card claims which can easily be faked. I could see where that'd be fun but it's not my cup of tea. Live and learn, etc.
I'm currently re-reading to see if I can get a solid read on anyone who's not you.
If you're not interested in this game may I suggest that you replace out so we can get someone who will contribute to the game please.
i have reasons. i'm not the best at explaining myself. it's the way he's doing things here compared to other games. his emotion about things, the way he's actually gotten into a numbers/theory argument with hindu. he cares about the outcome.
In post 441, Lucky2u wrote:Four votes on four different people... This is a mess.
In fairness, this was Lucky's last comment.
I think he's had the same effect as CN (Although CN is staying town for me).
In post 514, Soren wrote:Urgh what is Lucky doing this game. I'm not seeing any town motivation and just getting upset when ETL pushed for his lynched earlier.
So what's your opinion on him again? Do you think Lucky is scum or no?