In post 424, JohnnyFarrar wrote:a bunch of frustrated people voting you when they could be using their vote somewhere that actually matters.
I have as many votes as you have.
In post 424, JohnnyFarrar wrote:a bunch of frustrated people voting you when they could be using their vote somewhere that actually matters.
In post 398, Titus wrote:@Taly, I engage but hate walls this game.
Self meta is accurate probably but meta *farts*. You're ignoring your initial opening of RC is scum but vote Wickan.
@RC Sorry for your loss.
In post 399, talah wrote:In post 395, Taly wrote:talah is nulltown at best because she hasn't added anything beyond FA, Ice, or Wickan - or in general, beyond several pages ago.
Sheesh, talk about your arrows to the heart. And here I was thinking we had nice confident townreads going on one another.
In post 399, talah wrote:Anyway, I've done a bit more than that actually. I have JohnnyF as town, you as town, Titus townleaning and ABR some nullscum bullshit I can't read unless he decides to play the game. Simple Plan might be lurker-scum.
RC can be town just on principle. I don't see any deceptiveness coming from that area.
Ice I'm going to put back to null for now but I have some interest in getting something better. I've just been lazy and busy.
Frozen I might be mistaken on as scum but I'm keeping an eye on it.
I'll add to that, that what I'm seeing from Titus appears to be classic Titus town play - very little explanation you can actually follow and attempting to lead town with bravado. Surprisingly her possible-scumpool has both ICE and A Simple Plan in it - and although I'd prefer Frozen and ABR in there as well - realistically I'm rethinking both ICE and Frozen so I don't really have a beef with her.
So that's where I'm up to right now. Also I'm probably going to be casual / sporadic with this game I've decided (and this may just be a general playstyle change for me so that I can play mafia consistently rather than in huge work-heavy spurts), so get used to it.
In post 406, Wickan wrote:Short case: Taly's 110, his attempts to insist that his discussion w/ you were TvT and his buddying up to you, and going all the way back to his unvote on me early on, removing pressure. Although he does seem to have dropped the townread on you recently (not sure why, as I'm not sure what you've done differently that prompted it). (Taly will promptly dispute that he ever had a townread on you, but I honestly don't know how else to read 110)
See also my 230 for the short case on RC (although slightly out of date, I think most of it still holds)
Also @ICE: see my question above on the Titus wagon. Is it primarily driven by Titus not explaining her reads?
In post 423, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 420, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I'm suddenly grateful
Gratefulness is a great thing.
Except I win even with low effort, that's how good I am. Even gave you a link as evidence
In post 408, talah wrote:Firstly I didn't really like his pushes on Wickan and Taly. And I must say I didn't read in depth much of the wallks they'd posted but I felt that Taly was pretty much obvtowning from what I remember of his play.
(note to self I need to check out Taly's 3rd party play)
However, I can perhaps see that as legitimate attempts to sort Taly since he doesn't have to have the same read as me and obviously won't have the same reasons.
Secondly I didn't like how he switched back on me with an argument like "well maybe you really WERE after a speedlynch". I felt it was not thought through and didn't match any of the evidence in the thread, and could have been just a maneuvre to open up another line of suspicion since Frozen was obviously not gaining any support.
I believe he responded to that though, saying he is going to be constantly checking his reads - which is fine and townish enough. It was the lack of thought in the supposition that irked me, though.
Aside from that I have (or had) a general feeling that his reads aren't really becoming clarified. Look I understand that especially as a game goes on sometimes reads *don't* get easier, especially because you're only going to be right in a certain amount of cases, but Day 1 I think optimal lynches should be considered and I don't think your lynch-pool would be getting greyer and greyer. Anyway that point there is mainly feeling. I actually like his most recent post and that's after I'd been doing some reflection on whether his posting was actually coming from a more town perspective. I'm prepared to start thinking about consensus/compromise at this stage.
In post 426, Taly wrote:While you completely disregard any attempt to talk to me about why Ice or RC is a good wagon to pursue - AND answer any fucking question that I have. But that's not the icing on the cake
In post 426, Taly wrote:I did throw suspicion, and thought that RC was a good wagon to start - but RC was never a scumread.
Furthermore; why was voting Wickan such a bad thing? I was suspicious of him as well.
In post 426, Taly wrote:Another thing - your hold rebuttal of me self-metaing is complete trash. You go from:
"Self-meta is kind of accurate..."
But then you just dismiss and say meta as if you dismissed the argument as if it were nothing. Yet you say RC and I are scum based on our interactions in our previous game as scum? 334 361 Which btw, is wrong - and that entire sentence was backwards.
In post 433, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Titus what happens when Ice flips town?
In post 426, Taly wrote:
If you're referring to my read on ICE.... I AM townreading Ice, and I've said that in 344 and have said that I was lleaning town on him for awhile.
Why did you think I wasn't townreading him?
Furthermore - why did you say that I'd DENY any kind of townread I had on Ice?
This looks like a calculated misrep.... Especially since you still painted my interactions with Ice - me saying our interaction as TVT - was an attempt to BUDDY him.
In post 211, Taly wrote:
What I can't seem to understand is - People are throwing associative tells all over me, while criticizing my vote and unvote off of a wagon - and then twisting my questions and answers to have a thought.
Basically... I feel like there is probably scum between:
Ice, Wickan, FA
I'm tossing around Wickan and FA, moreso Wickan as the candidates - what do you think?
In post 316, Taly wrote:
I can understand the whole 'Ice oldschool town archetype' but it rubs me the wrong way, I'm not understanding where his heads at, which bothers me. I do agree with John, it does feel like he has an agenda and that's why my read is torn on him.
Plus, I rarely hear town say something like:
"Oh, get over yourself"
Eckh.... Association tells aren't bad D1, but Ice has relied a bit on those on his reads which feels like he's creating a little world that revolves around who needs to be lynched rather than looking at his reads in an individual light. If that's understandable.
In post 344, Taly wrote:
The thing that makes me think is - you put out a theory concerning that Wickan and I are scumpair, then Wickan comes in saying that I'm scum buddying you for the back and forth over my vote/unvote on HIM - himself.
From what I'm seeing - I'm being thrown out as an associative with several players at this point - and this isn't even considering Titus saying that I'm scum with RC and you, who you apparently scumread as well.
I don't think people see the how sticky of a situation this is - it causes all kinds of division and miscommunication, and the fact that people discredit me as "woe is me" and "youre a martyr" seriously makes me question their perspective in this game - IE, whether they have an agenda to push something as scum despite what may be presented, or town who actually wants to decipher between the game and work on it.
This is why I considered - and still leaning toward, you being town - and Wickan - being possible scum, for the inconsistencies I've seen of him - and the idea that he hasn't pushed anyone else yet after saying that my wagon isn't going anywhere...
In post 435, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Vote and see. We don't have all the answers but we've been playing this game a long time and have a lot of reasons for voting someone even if we don't verbalize them.
In post 438, Wickan wrote:And for the record, I absolutely 100% still believe that 110 was an attempt to buddy ICE. From the "I get in a lot of TvTs, especially D1" to trying to placate ICE's concerns to agreeing with his reads. It all looks like an attempt to deflect ICE's attention away from you and to other people.