He made an argument that Vet was laying low, and that he is therefore probably a power role. That's how I read it, anyway.
Just seems like something scum might do to disguise other scum who, predictably, lurk.
In post 177, ai_shuuu wrote:@azoriussenate
127oh did you interpret my post 52 and 64 that way?
What if i told you that my real reason to vote you are "your lack of interest of the current game progress or finding scum or certain event as i mentioned in #64"?
106 which post of mine did you read as town?
In post 203, goodmorning wrote:Why Vettrock?
In post 119, Radical Rat wrote:In post 115, shrike wrote:Out of curiosity, would everyone here be happy if their vote target was lynched? It seems people use votes differently to what I'm used to (ie to provoke reactions, not just to lynch)
If we answered this question, it would effectively remove the pressure we're trying to put on these people. Would you feel pressured by a vote you knew wasn't really meant to kill?
In post 141, Performer wrote:I think PC's self-vote is not very suspicious. However, as I said before I don't like his reaction to RR's accusation.
@shrike This is confusing to me as it sounds like you have ambivalent feeling about Phan.
Why do you believe Phan's self vote wasn't very suspicious?
VOTE: shrike
In post 148, PhantomCobalt wrote:114 - I'm the most voted player in the game. Why would I not be eager to remove my self vote?
In post 183, Radical Rat wrote:
Why indeed wouldn't you be eager to remove your self vote? You sat at L-1 for a very long time, and seemed to ignore all the posts telling you to unvote.... At least until you had an opportunity to put someone else at L-1..... Without announcing it.....
In post 168, PhantomCobalt wrote:Also, if vet is laying low, can we assume that he is a power role? I play power roles purposely a bit scummy so that I'm left alone by mafia because they think I could be a future ML target.
People I don't want to lynch today: Mort, Gm, Ai
Nullreads/hard to say: Rad Rat (having a
hard time reading RR), shrike (leaning town
on shrike), Performer (leaning scum on
Performer)
In post 210, ai_shuuu wrote:People I don't want to lynch today: Mort, Gm, Ai
Nullreads/hard to say: Rad Rat (having a
hard time reading RR), shrike (leaning town
on shrike), Performer (leaning scum on
Performer)
what really bother me on azor reads are :
He town read mort and nulling Rat when both of them are using the same reasoning to justify their vote on phantom; scum buddying a town. On top of that, i wouldn't read 56 as a strong post to town read mort, anyone can said what mort had been said.
He react so strongly on my first reasoning when i vote him but then he town read me when he think my vote on him is some sort of reaction test, or a push with no intent to lynch.
Well, i have to admit some of it is true, and somehow he had been generating more content recently. But i'm not really sure its because he had a wagon behind him or he really really want to do it.
And shrike...
Azor read shrike as lean to town by this post, correct me if im wrong
"Unvoting me taking me out of hammering
range. Me and shrike must be partners!! Case solved!"
Can you elaborate more on this @azor?
Then he Town read GM because some of GM's comment are somehow save him
Like when GM speak to performer "thats not it, thats not it at all"
I won't say anything about his read on performer and phantom tough. Both of them either doesn't have strong argument or (missinterpreting?) azor post.
In post 211, PhantomCobalt wrote:Well, I guess I'll just claim cop now.
In post 200, MortFeld wrote:
He made an argument that Vet was laying low, and that he is therefore probably a power role. That's how I read it, anyway.
Just seems like something scum might do to disguise other scum who, predictably, lurk.
I will say the TR on you isn't on par with my other TR's so far in this game.
[/quote]
Nullreads/hard to say: Rad Rat (having a hard time reading RR), shrike (leaning town on shrike), Performer (leaning scum on Performer)
High chance I will vote on them: Phantom, vettrock
In post 215, Performer wrote:In post 200, MortFeld wrote:
He made an argument that Vet was laying low, and that he is therefore probably a power role. That's how I read it, anyway.
Just seems like something scum might do to disguise other scum who, predictably, lurk.
This post is confusing. You're telling me that PC spoke of vet being a town PR, then you spoke PC being scum and him covering for his scum buddy, vet.
In post 168, PhantomCobalt wrote:Also, if vet is laying low, can we assume that he is a power role? I play power roles purposely a bit scummy so that I'm left alone by mafia because they think I could be a future ML target.
without putting up said list, all before claiming cop. My disbelief is compounded by the fact that you even stated that it's been your strategy to lay low as a power role. You're a player who expressly does the same things he's done in previous games (self-voting), so this is all just super weird for me.In post 199, PhantomCobalt wrote:I'll put up my condensed reads list either around 4:30 pm et or 8:40 et
Then he Town read GM because some of GM's comment are somehow save him
Like when GM speak to performer "thats not it, thats not it at all"
I won't say anything about his read on performer and phantom tough. Both of them either doesn't have strong argument or (missinterpreting?) azor post.
What I think about the cop claim: isn't role claiming something scum sometimes do to confuse town and buy themselves time when they're about to die? That isn't particularly complex analysis but claiming cop isn't a particularly complex way to convince people you're not scum. I get that role claiming has its own implications but at its core it's also someone saying "I'm town! You have to believe me!" Furthermore, PC said earlier this game
In post 222, MortFeld wrote:Don't take this as suspicion from me at all, this question is only one of meta clarification. Why is my analysis of the cop claim less valid than yours? Does that hinge on there being no reason to lynch PC (i.e. if PC were scummier, we might have more reason to believe it's a false claim)?