In post 294, Errantparabola wrote:That last minute change was scummy? Are you serious? What about it was scummy? Please, do tell.
You're right. I was don't remember what I was thinking when I said this. It might have been that you unvoted after deadline, but that might not have been intentional, in fact, it probably wasn't, so sorry.
PEdit: not arguing with you over what logic is craps and what isn't
Also my point wasnt as much that you weren't doing the latter, it was that you were doing too much of the former, and it was a request(perhaps not in the kindest of terms, apologies) to focus on the latter.
MarioManiac4 wrote:I haven't trusted Ranger for years and years.
Funny because unless you come from the same site I do (hint: we started playing werewolf before switching to playing Mafia at around game 14 or so...with a brief period where both were run side-by-side), this is the first game we've had together.
I mean...I suppose you
could
be from that site (there's only so many Rangers who play the game of mafia), but if you're not, we quite literally could not have possibly met each other before. And if so, you certainly don't play by the name of MarioManiac4.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
MarioManiac4 wrote:I haven't trusted Ranger for years and years.
Funny because unless you come from the same site I do (hint: we started playing werewolf before switching to playing Mafia at around game 14 or so...with a brief period where both were run side-by-side), this is the first game we've had together.
I mean...I suppose you
could
be from that site (there's only so many Rangers who play the game of mafia), but if you're not, we quite literally could not have possibly met each other before. And if so, you certainly don't play by the name of MarioManiac4.
that was a way of saying i haven't trusted you since basically the start of this game
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
I'm ok with ending the game now if that's cool with everyone. Errant's responses were still scummy, I gave him a chance to redeem himself and he didn't.
There is no good or evil. There is only fun and boring.
In post 306, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:I'm ok with ending the game now if that's cool with everyone. Errant's responses were still scummy, I gave him a chance to redeem himself and he didn't.
Since the game isn't going to end, take note of this statement and how terrible it is.
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
Yakko, however, owes an explanation for how much decreased activity Yakko's had, along with the sudden vote out of nowhere.
Especially since in iso, Yakko's...given a lot less than I remember.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
My mind tells me vote ranger because opening vote is opening and excited about a game that's gone dry for most of the frustrated townies who cannot see any flips. My gut says vote Mario because seriously what is he adding to the game?
Extrapolated Eagle wrote:My mind tells me vote ranger because opening vote is opening and excited about a game that's gone dry for most of the frustrated townies who cannot see any flips.
If you think this is me excited...go do your homework on me.
No, this is me, mostly apathetic, with a side bit of frustration.
Oh. And let me ask you this:
MarioManiac4 wrote:I was the first to suspect your major scumread.
VOTE: Ranger
Eat L-1.
What say your mind to
this
, hmm?
'Cause this is very clearly scum, taking advantage of the situation.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
Alright that L-1 vote was scummy as hell. All my major scum reads are lynched now so I'm kind of a a loss. Chances are we got at least one scum but let's be safe and always assume the worst.
I'm gonna give the game a once over tonight and see if I find anything but with the deadline looming
VOTE: mario
That was crazy opportunistic. I'm not voting my town reads unless it comes right down too it. That'd be Ranger and Eagle. Yakko behind that.
Let's lynch scum, guys.
There is no good or evil. There is only fun and boring.