In post 674, pignash wrote:In post 665, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:Pig, why are you voting Kop and why is it suddenly okay to put them at L-1?
I was on the wagon yesterday and wanted to see the flip. He seemed me immediately onto Kim scummily day 1 and he's role fishing today.
In post 675, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:But why did you go from advising people to unvote, to putting Kop at L-1 so suddenly?
In post 681, Kop wrote:BBMolla - I've already stated my thoughts on him, I am scum reading it, whether it be role fishing or not, there was simply no reason to come out with that soft claim. No need. It brought unnecessary attention onto himself. I was willing to reach a compromise to allow him to prove his claim, but with The Man bringing up what he did about Skybird then it put more doubts onto what I think of him.
Wanderer - I wasn't paying that much attention to what she says, but then with the day two antics on how she handled herself, she started to worry me, she accused me of fence sitting, but then she did it herself withholding herself and not willing to commit fully to whatever reservations she had.
Pignash - He was on my wagon day one, fair point, it was a bad vote, but I'd already stated I was happy my vote to be there and had no other thoughts to put towards it. Now a lot has gone on since the start of day two, he hasn't been able to comment on any of it, but join my wagon again when it's making steam.
Davesaz - Same as Pignash, he hasn't contributed to anything since start of day two, other than go after me.
If I had a lynching order. It would be -
1) Wanderer
2) Davesaz
3) Pignash
I've already put my two townish reads out there. The rest are null.
In post 681, Kop wrote:
Davesaz - Same as Pignash, he hasn't contributed to anything since start of day two, other than go after me.
In post 683, davesaz wrote:In post 681, Kop wrote:
Davesaz - Same as Pignash, he hasn't contributed to anything since start of day two, other than go after me.
This is grade A bullshit. I was actually ready to move off of you, until you started going after BBMolla and then bringing up Skybird. As I said before, if someone softs in this setup, the only town move is to ignore it. I have been actively hunting scum, bynotparticipating in the "which one is lying" debate and watching out for who does try to push that. You aren't the only one I have my eyes on, but we have limited time.
Even if you're town, which I seriously doubt, I strongly believe your flip is the most revealing one we can get today.
In post 655, Frozen Angel wrote:That BBmola move was scummy for another matter : this can be a scum trying to hunt pr's
but we can have more than 1 investigative roles here. and I can count that as a bulletproof claim. or even a doctor trying to wifom .
there are lots of possibilities about that claim. I really don't see a town perspective for pushing that spot which can lead to a mass claim.
In post 671, Wanderer-nl wrote:
I'm actually having more issues with dave's vote then with pignash's but I don't think there's enough time left in this day to talk about it so I'm saving that.
In post 686, Skybird wrote:In post 655, Frozen Angel wrote:That BBmola move was scummy for another matter : this can be a scum trying to hunt pr's
but we can have more than 1 investigative roles here. and I can count that as a bulletproof claim. or even a doctor trying to wifom .
there are lots of possibilities about that claim. I really don't see a town perspective for pushing that spot which can lead to a mass claim.
We are playing an open setup. Do you understand what that means?
ty for mentioning this. 
In post 663, pignash wrote:I thought he had 4 before and we've had more votes between then and now. Nothing wrong with putting him there if it's intentional. In fact:
VOTE: Kop L-1
In post 682, Kop wrote:In post 681, Kop wrote:BBMolla - I've already stated my thoughts on him, I am scum reading it, whether it be role fishing or not, there was simply no reason to come out with that soft claim. No need. It brought unnecessary attention onto himself. I was willing to reach a compromise to allow him to prove his claim, but with The Man bringing up what he did about Skybird then it put more doubts onto what I think of him.
Wanderer - I wasn't paying that much attention to what she says, but then with the day two antics on how she handled herself, she started to worry me, she accused me of fence sitting, but then she did it herself withholding herself and not willing to commit fully to whatever reservations she had.
Pignash - He was on my wagon day one, fair point, it was a bad vote, but I'd already stated I was happy my vote to be there and had no other thoughts to put towards it. Now a lot has gone on since the start of day two, he hasn't been able to comment on any of it, but join my wagon again when it's making steam.
Davesaz - Same as Pignash, he hasn't contributed to anything since start of day two, other than go after me.
If I had a lynching order. It would be -
1) Wanderer
2) Davesaz
3) Pignash
I've already put my two townish reads out there. The rest are null.
Taking out BBMolla and Skybird out of the list, as the both of them can prove over night, going into day three, and if neither can provide any result to what they are, then that top 3 list will change.
In post 694, pignash wrote:FRB been a bit busy with work and not taking usual breaks so I'm mostly on in the evenings. Trying to up my participation levels. Still feel good about my vote.
Don't like FA, do like TheMan.
In post 687, davesaz wrote:In post 671, Wanderer-nl wrote:
I'm actually having more issues with dave's vote then with pignash's but I don't think there's enough time left in this day to talk about it so I'm saving that.
Why do you have a problem with my vote? I think you failed to notice that my vote was already on Kop, days ago. I revoted for emphasis.
In post 649, davesaz wrote:Maybe we should just go ahead and lynch Kop.
In post 693, davesaz wrote:
How are you doing this without posting anything in the replacement thread ?
