In post 445, Titus wrote:Point blank: I healed or stopped you. I wanted pressure to determine which.
You said you crumbed a role. Said role must not get feedback, thus you would know I blocked you.
You made a post where you assumed my block to be true.
You're assuming I came out here and blatantly lied about jailing you for shits and jiggle. Nope.
Let's use facts here.
My soft claim is only understandable to me and persivul.
I'm about 95% you caught the claim and trying to push this lynch to help your scum buddies get rid of town role that is confirmable.
No where did I say I believed the claim.
I wondered at first if you were trying to gambit or reaction for others.
All of which I stated.
So in short your lying scum hoping to get me lynched.
And since Titus is trying to push this mislynch I did my subtle claim in this game directed to Titus and she has made no effort to try and find it.
That is why I'm 95% certain she caught my claim is lying
In post 455, Squirrelly wrote:Your the scum player faking a role that you don't have to lynch town.
I'll wait for others to look at it and question things here
So I randomly fakeclaim jailkeepers to start a day in violation of every scumrule I have?
Well I'm not voting you or Squirrelly today based on present info, though your reasoning makes me a lot less comfortable taking queues from squirrelly.
In post 455, Squirrelly wrote:Your the scum player faking a role that you don't have to lynch town.
I'll wait for others to look at it and question things here
So I randomly fakeclaim jailkeepers to start a day in violation of every scumrule I have?
Let's see, outs any cc for scum.
Helps scum team there.
Trying to lynch a role you know is confirmable, also helps your scum team.
Tell me how your action even should read town?
In post 460, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Well I'm not voting you or Squirrelly today based on present info, though your reasoning makes me a lot less comfortable taking queues from squirrelly.
Wanderer is another scum read. Titus isn't talking about anyone on the actual wagon that lynched town sure made me wonder who she was protecting as her scum buddy
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.
Probably, but I wouldn't blame someone for not coming to the conclusion that titus is jailkeeper either.
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.
I'm not a mind reader, nothing she posted said hey I protected you dumb ass.
If so please quote it
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.
This was towards and for Titus as far as what I was being subtle about.
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not
I don't recall ever playing with you.
Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.
Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not
I don't recall ever playing with you.
Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.
Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?
Blitz 1. Sure. Let's discuss it.
You're town. Dwelee town. Ranger town (we should agree on this one). Let's go.
Not the first blitz.
I'll play along for a moment. You trust me, I'll trust you and just smile and nod when I say innocent is a town read of mine.
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.
Yup.
Fuck off.
Didn't realize you were interested in my masturbation habits.
So how are you confirmable? Why are you backing off if convinced? Why not argue scum jailkeeper?
