Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

Titus · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:24 pm

Ugh another false positive on that...and the mod puts that in multiball...

I just figured you were being arrogant atm

Squirrelly · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:25 pm

In post 473, Titus wrote:
In post 471, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 469, Titus wrote:
In post 464, texcat wrote:
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.

I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.

Yup.

Fuck off.

Didn't realize you were interested in my masturbation habits.

So how are you confirmable? Why are you backing off if convinced? Why not argue scum jailkeeper?

Looks up many negative terms to use on Titus.
Shrug
Too bad it will wait for post game, in the mean time you should read things said already

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:26 pm

Its pretty blatant after that lol.

Squirrelly · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:26 pm

In post 475, Titus wrote:Ugh another false positive on that...and the mod puts that in multiball...

I just figured you were being arrogant atm

Finally!!!
Jesus women I didn't want to smack you in the face with it.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:27 pm

Hey guys I actually don't have any time to post this weekend but I will on Monday. Can someone give me a quick recap? Has anyone claimed yet?

Titus · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:27 pm

UNVOTE:

Squirrelly · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:27 pm

In post 479, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey guys I actually don't have any time to post this weekend but I will on Monday. Can someone give me a quick recap? Has anyone claimed yet?

Yes, vote wanderer

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:28 pm

Recap. We lynched town. One town died. We're bad at the game. Oh, and squirrelly just confirmed as a chipmunk.

Titus · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:28 pm

In post 479, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey guys I actually don't have any time to post this weekend but I will on Monday. Can someone give me a quick recap? Has anyone claimed yet?

Farside Always Innocent and I are confirmed town.

VOTE: Wanderer

Squirrelly · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:29 pm

I pulled a rabbit out of my hat.

Squirrelly · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:30 pm

In post 483, Titus wrote:
In post 479, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey guys I actually don't have any time to post this weekend but I will on Monday. Can someone give me a quick recap? Has anyone claimed yet?

Farside Always Innocent and I are confirmed town.

VOTE: Wanderer

Add beepop to the list

Titus · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:31 pm

How??? That sounds broke as fuck

Squirrelly · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:32 pm

In post 486, Titus wrote:How??? That sounds broke as fuck

Gf?
Protective/jk type can protect one but no more info for that one then

Titus · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:38 pm

In post 487, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 486, Titus wrote:How??? That sounds broke as fuck

Gf?
Protective/jk type can protect one but no more info for that one then

Totally not wat I thought you were claiming...

hi im Yakko · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:09 pm

I may or may not have skimmed the Titus v Squirelly. My understanding of it was a misunderstanding on titus' part. What misunderstanding I am not entirely sure. Whatever. Titus is dumbtelling right? What does that mean again? I'll go look on the wiki.

VOTE: texcat

I don't remeber them commiting to anything nor having any gamesolvey posts.

What is the case on wanderer?

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:15 pm

Re-reading wanderer's posts now. What was jumping out at you guys? I didn't like this, [quote="In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 7#p7460707]117 the way he calls himself town in this one doesn't feel nearly as bad as 81,
[/quote] but I know some people think that way. Agreeing with yakko though, whats the case here? I'm going to hold my vote open for a tad longer.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:18 pm

Broken code, either way, its post 339

Titus · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:26 pm

In post 489, hi im Yakko wrote:I may or may not have skimmed the Titus v Squirelly. My understanding of it was a misunderstanding on titus' part. What misunderstanding I am not entirely sure. Whatever. Titus is dumbtelling right? What does that mean again? I'll go look on the wiki.

VOTE: texcat

I don't remeber them commiting to anything nor having any gamesolvey posts.

What is the case on wanderer?

I don't want a Texcat wagon today.

Firebringer · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:11 pm

Guys I am V/LA site wide till Wednesday.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:32 pm

In post 492, Titus wrote:
In post 489, hi im Yakko wrote:I may or may not have skimmed the Titus v Squirelly. My understanding of it was a misunderstanding on titus' part. What misunderstanding I am not entirely sure. Whatever. Titus is dumbtelling right? What does that mean again? I'll go look on the wiki.

VOTE: texcat

I don't remeber them commiting to anything nor having any gamesolvey posts.

What is the case on wanderer?

I don't want a Texcat wagon today.

Two votes on wanderer zero explanation from either. Don't recall or maybe I am misremembering but you didn't express interest in him yesterday.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:50 am

In post 483, Titus wrote:
In post 479, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey guys I actually don't have any time to post this weekend but I will on Monday. Can someone give me a quick recap? Has anyone claimed yet?

Farside Always Innocent and I are confirmed town.

VOTE: Wanderer

You are confirmed town? I guess I missed something.

1. You pushed the lynch on Phantom.
2. You thought Ranger was strongly town, when she didn't do anything but throwing around random reads apparently for the sake of appearing town.
3. You were attacking me because I criticized Ranger, and then even went as far as to attack me on my use of language, as if that is somehow indicative of my alignment.

If you somehow had a very good reason to believe Ranger was town at that point, like if you were Masons, then she would have returned the favor. Instead, she thought you could be scum.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:35 am

In post 439, Titus wrote:So squirrely are you still going to call me a liar on jailing you?

Hm. Ok then. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming that your PR claim is truthful.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:36 am

So, could you explain why you were townreading Ranger, when she scumread you?

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:40 am

Anyway.

VOTE: Albert B. Rampage

For lurking.

Might change my vote to Wanderer later, but I do not feel like joining another wagon too soon, given that it ended up being a mislynch last time. I don't trust her, though.

Squirrelly · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:58 am

In post 488, Titus wrote:
In post 487, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 486, Titus wrote:How??? That sounds broke as fuck

Gf?
Protective/jk type can protect one but no more info for that one then

Totally not wat I thought you were claiming...

Sigh.
Cries
Go back and read what was said for day 2.
I don't want to hurt you, but I do hate your ignorance currently.

In regards to wander post 231 is what I call lip service, lots of I agree with this and that and jumped on PC for weak reason.
this is a pile o crap reasoning to scum read someone
Finally she isn't asking questions or figuring jack shit in this game. She's riding low as I expect scum to do throwing out bad reasoning so the other team doesn't kill her.