In post 574, RolePlay25 wrote:In post 570, Frozen Angel wrote:why are you twisting my word again?
although your hard tunnel on him was clearly scummy but I wasn't talking about it ... I was talking about myself.
Interesting. This makes no sense. I mislike clear nonsense.
In post 560, Frozen Angel wrote:your making too much noise about my slot . I don't like noises. come direct on me Roleplay.
Explain how I twisted your words in my post.
In post 580, RolePlay25 wrote:Is your alignment the same as Bloodking's? If so, for what earthly reason would anyone's read on you change? Catch-up is irrelevant. Perhaps it is a level of naiveté showing, but I feel no particular requirement or desire to partake in any rituals before I secure your death.
In post 557, Frozen Angel wrote:
post 263 : now everybody posting walls? why someone being in a hot water is a bad thing? you ever asked why people are pushing golden ?
In post 568, Keyser Söze wrote:Everyone has fled the BL0ODK1NG wagon, bar you and I. Frozen Angel's very presence seemingly dispelled all fear and doubt on her slot.
In post 582, Frozen Angel wrote:your saying you want to tunnel my slot to death base on ... ?
give me the reasons your so obsessed with this lynch
bji wrote:
Because when you make three lists it's easy to forget someone. What a weird thing to say though. "wow good point" about something on the level of a typo.
In post 557, Frozen Angel wrote:
post 263 : now everybody posting walls? why someone being in a hot water is a bad thing? you ever asked why people are pushing golden ?
Don't forget, you're posting walls too. It's what happens when you do a re-read of the thread and try to give your thoughts.
I never said someone being in hot water is a bad thing. I was pointing it out. It was a subtle attempt to get golden more engaged since he wasn't responding to the votes against him.
In post 583, bji wrote:Is that surprising, given that the wagon on Bloodking was there mostly because people didn't like his level of activity, both in terms of volume, and in terms of producing a "too safe, didn't try hard enough" reads list? Frozen Angel certainly took care of dispelling both of these issues right off the bat.
In post 585, Frozen Angel wrote:thx you just answered how I expected.
In post 584, RolePlay25 wrote:In post 582, Frozen Angel wrote:your saying you want to tunnel my slot to death base on ... ?
give me the reasons your so obsessed with this lynch
You state you have reread. I do believe I have explained this quite thoroughly. Either you have reread or you have not.
Cow and Dwlee, have you ceased benefiting your doubts already?
after all those catching up posts are you accusing me of lying about catching up?! 
In post 586, RolePlay25 wrote:In post 583, bji wrote:Is that surprising, given that the wagon on Bloodking was there mostly because people didn't like his level of activity, both in terms of volume, and in terms of producing a "too safe, didn't try hard enough" reads list? Frozen Angel certainly took care of dispelling both of these issues right off the bat.
In level of activity, higher.
In content of activity, no change.
Shall I produce some flash cards with smiley faces to communicate the sheer lack of content in her posts to you? It is not so hard to produce a very weak summary of events that occurred within a game. Especially one dominated by said faces and vague commentary (mostly about how she does not like the votes on her, apparently the primary focus of her reread).
In post 587, RolePlay25 wrote:In post 585, Frozen Angel wrote:thx you just answered how I expected.
Good. Vote for yourself and die then.
In post 586, RolePlay25 wrote:Shall I produce some flash cards with smiley faces to communicate the sheer lack of content in her posts to you? It is not so hard to produce a very weak summary of events that occurred within a game. Especially one dominated by said faces and vague commentary (mostly about how she does not like the votes on her, apparently the primary focus of her reread).
In post 593, RolePlay25 wrote:Frozen Angel, each post you make in this thread provides us additional information about the identity of your partners. Each post you make provides us more and more information that will allow us to win the game. Please, keep posting. I am already learning a lot.
Already it is apparent that you wish to hard ride the lie that I voted Bloodking simply for activity level. I understand, you must formulate a defense of activity that was simply indefensible. You are not allowed to acknowledge your role is villainous. You are not allowed to wave the white flag and surrender. And I do admire the last ditch holding effort.
It is a last ditch holding effort though.
