My last post ended at the Bottom of Page 20, not 19. So starting at the Top of Page 21....
I find it to be pretty anti-town of those people who refuse to answer Firebringer. Maybe FB just happened to miss a post explaining why someone thinks she's scum in the midst of all the 1v1 BS that was going on. The "Pay attention to the thread" and "Read the thread" snarkiness is pretty awful. Just answer the question and move on.
However, deflection (look at them, not me!), as well as promoting policy lynching, isn't helpful in FB's case, ala this:
In post 521, Firebringer wrote:Like if you want to make a case for players not engaging or hunting you should be looking at RC and Starbucks.
They are literally being inactive.
Though I hate to lynch players for being inactive, it gives us zero information.
I know that I'm one of the people that she lists, and I'm not mad about it. However, inactivity is a null tell, not a scum tell and at this point, focus is on FB and her deflection is quite apparent.
Not to mention that she lists everyone as scum on her reads list. I mean, I don't like reads list for the fact that I can usually pick out maybe two people that I can see as town, maybe one as scum, and the rest end up null on Day 1 because I'm still growing used to the vast number of new players on MS. Listing everyone as scum is just lazy and shows no initiative. I agree with those saying that FB isn't scumhunting.
I like Elyse's reaction to that post in
#522.
In post 535, Titus wrote: In post 530, Starbuck wrote: In post 202, CuddlyKitteh wrote:Do me a favor, but let titus and I actually engage with each other than answer questions for her, please and thanks.
I have a lot of experience re:titus. So getting in my way might actually hurt my read on her because I was wrong last game because I jumped to an early townread on her, but then when I finally started to scum read her I ended up being vigged before I could elaborate on it. :\
~M
I'm not generally cool with these type of statements because it feels like someone trying to squash conversation.
Everything she said there was true. TBH, I thought she visited me and that's why she died. I was shifting bricks. I was thankful Mario had the busted guilty there.
Whether or not it was true, taking over the thread or telling anyone else to not interact is anti-town. I'm not a fan of that kind of stance because it's wholly unhelpful.
Yeah, because shouldn't we technically fall into null if you don't have a read either direction?
In post 547, CuddlyKitteh wrote:I am unsure on the technicality of this but wouldn't scum be a member of town too? This could be scum!you trying to finding a loophole around this so I think you should rephrase that by clearly stating your alignment.
- S
Scum are scum. How would they be a member of the town?
I don't understand how that could be a loophole or if you're just trying to throw shade. I did what was asked.
Ending at the Bottom of Page 22.
