UNI MUM Mafia (Day 3, Stay Gold Pony)

Sharky5x · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 2:54 pm

V/LA til Thursday the 24th

RolePlay25 · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 2:58 pm

In post 399, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 398, RolePlay25 wrote:
In post 396, 3dicerolling wrote:I don't mean to be needy, but can one of you get an avatar? (play rock-paper-scissors or something)

Will you join with me and target evil?

Who do you deem to be evil?

Agent, you have one weapon! Where is mine aimed?

3dicerolling · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:01 pm

In post 401, RolePlay25 wrote:
In post 399, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 398, RolePlay25 wrote:
In post 396, 3dicerolling wrote:I don't mean to be needy, but can one of you get an avatar? (play rock-paper-scissors or something)

Will you join with me and target evil?

Who do you deem to be evil?

Agent, you have one weapon! Where is mine aimed?

A vacuum!

But why are you going after tn? I think you a trying to clean where there is no dirt.

RolePlay25 · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:09 pm

They shoot based not on the actions of another, but on the frivolous reasons that their actions resemble what occurred on a previous mission!

Agents should know that those who look for connections to a previous mission shall always find them, regardless of which organization they or their other number served. Such is at best a starting point, yet here appears the end point. It is an action, not of tense, but pretense.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:10 pm

In post 403, RolePlay25 wrote:They shoot based not on the actions of another, but on the frivolous reasons that their actions resemble what occurred on a previous mission!

Agents should know that those who look for connections to a previous mission shall always find them, regardless of which organization they or their other number served. Such is at best a starting point, yet here appears the end point. It is an action, not of tense, but pretense.

Good theory point. Direct me to where the players in question do this in a substantive fashion please.

RolePlay25 · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:12 pm

Set your coordinates to 214, rookie.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:16 pm

Ah. Meh. Not substantial enough for me.

RolePlay25 · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:19 pm

As compared to keeping your gun holstered?

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:20 pm

I don't even see what he did as especially scummy. It's bad practice, but not alignment indicative.

And my gun generally stays holstered.

RolePlay25 · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:54 pm

If it were good theory in training, as you said agent, does it not apply in the field?

Your style is your own, for I shall not target a claim of mason at first dawn, but I mislike such reversals.

Elbirn · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:04 pm

1. I'm not sure if I really, really like role play guy or if I want to strangle him

2. I will do literally anything for the two of you to both get an avatar.

Anything.

*winks*

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:14 pm

In post 409, RolePlay25 wrote:If it were good theory in training, as you said agent, does it not apply in the field?

Your style is your own, for I shall not target a claim of mason at first dawn, but I mislike such reversals.

I never claimed mason. I presented a hypothetical in order to receive a response which I have not yet received. And just because I agree it's bad practice to rely upon past games as ones reasoning for reads in the current one does not mean I believe doing so is scummy.

dramonic · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:49 pm

Votecount 2: I guess I don't have to be the one making people miserable :3

DiamondSentinel (3): ErrantParabola, 3dicerolling, Learned Hand
Jeanne11 (2): tn5421, DiamondSentinel
Elbirn (1): Jeanne11
sharky5x (1): Elbirn
zmuffinman (1): Edgar Allan Pro
3dicerolling (1): Mass Flop
tn5421 (1): roleplay25

Not Voting: Klingoncelt, Cerberus v666, sharky5x, Davsto, Shiro, BBMolla, zmuffinman

It is 9 to lynch. Theoretical Deadline is in 12 days and 5 hours, although Holiday Special Extension is possible.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:52 pm

Interesting. Max 3 votes. On DS. Because...people don't like something he said earlier?

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:57 pm

In post 413, Cerberus v666 wrote:Interesting. Max 3 votes. On DS. Because...people don't like something he said earlier?

Happens, oh, EVERY GAME. But it's fine. I won't get lynched. Probably.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:05 pm

Ah, it was the lynch all millers thing. Tell me DS, did you not realize errant was the original miller claimant,and thought this was a third? If so, who did you think were the other two? If not, why didn't you make this comment about millers back when the second claim originally occurred.?

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:11 pm

I missed errants original miller claim, thus thinking he was the third. I thought that dice and Jeanne were the other miller claims. Still think that they are scum. Not sure about Errant, but really unimpressed by him thus far.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:14 pm

In post 416, DiamondSentinel wrote:I missed errants original miller claim, thus thinking he was the third. I thought that dice and Jeanne were the other miller claims. Still think that they are scum. Not sure about Errant, but really unimpressed by him thus far.

Who are the miller claims right now then?

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:52 pm

Dice and Errant, iirc

Elbirn · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:54 pm

Not sure if I've missed something

Or DS' reading comprehension blows ass-water

*squinty face*

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:55 pm

Well, I mean, it does on the internet, but that's beside the point. I'm almost 100% sure that Dice claimed Miller

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:56 pm

In post 419, Elbirn wrote:Not sure if I've missed something

Or DS' reading comprehension blows ass-water

*squinty face*

The second. DS, you might want to rereread.

Elbirn · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:59 pm

UNVOTE:

Guys quick, where should my vote be?

BBmolla · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:33 pm

catching up

tn5421 · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:42 pm

In post 307, 3dicerolling wrote:VOTE: DiamondSentinel

Calls out Jeanne and I for mixing insults with content.

Does the same thing a post later.

Not a town reaction to clear sarcasm. The only town thing you've done was your reaction test against Jeanne.

In post 403, RolePlay25 wrote:They shoot based not on the actions of another, but on the frivolous reasons that their actions resemble what occurred on a previous mission!

Agents should know that those who look for connections to a previous mission shall always find them, regardless of which organization they or their other number served. Such is at best a starting point, yet here appears the end point. It is an action, not of tense, but pretense.

Jeanne is blatantly antitown as any alignment, it benefits town to remove her from the game in my humble opinion.