In post 774, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have one scumread. Sell me on something else.
I'd also do Adaptive.
In fact I think I will vote Adaptive.
VOTE: Adaptive Heap
Aristophanes wrote:RC, what stuck out about Dat hydra?
In post 774, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have one scumread. Sell me on something else.
I'd also do Adaptive.
In fact I think I will vote Adaptive.
VOTE: Adaptive Heap
Aristophanes wrote:RC, what stuck out about Dat hydra?
In post 696, mastin2 wrote:Since family night isn't happening tonight, thought I'd pop in quickly to say: not site flaking.
Just...very, very preoccupied with something that to you would be something you'd prioritize as being below mafia but which to me is really, really, REALLY important. (Read my blog for the details.)
Regardless of whether I succeed or fail, I'm going to be back Monday, but that's time I won't be here, because...well, yeah. I REALLY want to get this project done. It holds significant personal meaning to me and is a MAJOR milestone in my life if I can get it done. So I'm going to ask my hydra partner to hold the fort until Monday. I'll overcome inertia and contribute then. Somehow. Because yeah, need to rebalance my mafia life. Just...now now. Three days from now. Consider it V/LA.
If my mental calculation is correct, that's a full day before the deadline, meaning plenty of time for me to catch up.
In post 579, Adaptive Heap wrote:Why is Davsto your top townread after one post?
Where's the culmination of all your scumhunting?
Do you townhunt?
In post 587, Persivul wrote:In post 582, Adaptive Heap wrote:Davsto is town why?
For reasons already given. Making a lengthy incriminating post with post references is not "just sitting" on one's vote. And you still haven't answered my question - what's in it for davsto to side with me and antagonize Rob?
Typically when I'm supporting the person under heaviest fire on D1, I'm town. And typically, someone accuses me of WKing. That's a charge that IMO gets thrown around too much lately, and shouldn't be made until there's a flip.
In post 473, Persivul wrote:Good post by davsto. Whether Rob's scum or town, it would be easier for scum to side with him rather than me as Rob has greater site cred and popularity.
In post 570, Adaptive Heap wrote:Ultimately I question the actual content which he brought in his catch-up post and wonder if you're just blind to it because he said what you wanted to hear.
In post 771, Davsto wrote:Oh looks like I was right about Persivul slot, how strange.
In post 741, RadiantCowbells wrote:Welcome to RCMafia.
Where the reads are made up and the votes don't matter.
In post 586, Davsto wrote:This reasoning is flawed. Why would an SK fakeclaim FBI Agent? Through being an SK, he'd know there's quite a risk of there being an FBI Agent in the game, and as such fakeclaiming FBI brings with it quite a decent chance of being counter-claimed.In post 571, Rob14 wrote:Pers, the reason I don't consider two kills to confirm is that FBI Agent is a great fake claim for an SK.
Think about it. You get the two kills to "confirm". Scum don't kill you because you can't investigate on them. It's pretty airtight.
I thought about your claim and how it could/couldn't be confirmed, and I concluded that there was no feasible way to confirm it without assuming that an SK wouldn't lie. And that's obviously not a good assumption to make.
In post 648, Davsto wrote:In post 633, Soren wrote:Question is, would mafia!Persi claim FBI?
He wouldn't, because if he guesses from setup spec that:
there isn't an SK, it would soon become apparent and he'd get fucked over.
there is an SK, he is painting a big target on his arse for a crosskill (as well as a risk of being counterclaimed).
This claim reinforces my townread on him.
In post 639, Not_Mafia wrote:Just realised Adaptive Heap is talah and mastin neither of these should be making such poor arguments
In post 641, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 378, Adaptive Heap wrote:I was asking why you made the comment about Not_Mafia's username in the first place.
Also please don't patronise me. I don't find it funny or clever.
-t
In post 381, Adaptive Heap wrote:And again, I'm not sure how it helps you determine anyone's alignment.
Were you hoping for a pingback from Not_Mafia? You got one. How did you read it?
-t
In post 780, RadiantCowbells wrote:I think I'll get a better read on the slot from RC frankly.
Yeah, I heard RC is so easy to read.
In post 535, Soren wrote:To comment on Persivul vs Rob. Rob is winning for me and honestly I feel like sheeping the vote. I have to say that Rob is like Sherlock Holmes, he'll notice the minute details and whether that tells him that someone is scum or town. I particularly find Persivul's bout with Rob to be like flinging dirt at Rob. Persi's argument is convoluted, I don't even know why he's scum reading Rob. Whereas Rob has enumerated and laid out many times as to why Persi is scum. I do not like Persi vote hopping so much. After he unvoted Rob he went from Ari, to FA to Dav to shiro and now to Rob again. What is he actually trying to accomplish with that. For me, it appears as thought Persi is scum trying to fake "proactive towness" and make it look like he is actually doing something in the game when he is not.
I particularly liked Shiro's criticism of Persi's play, in his 447 and 449. He raises an important point that Persi is faking an attempt to pressure players. With the mention of Shiro, I have to say that he is ringing town to me. He may not have posted much, but what he has posted is informing me that he has a town mindset coming into the game, while he is not actively pushing people, he is noticing the little holes that scum were unable to cover up in their plays.
In post 784, RadiantCowbells wrote:Yeah I saw the Frozen-scum rigmarole and still don't know why you did it.
to see how Frozen would react.
I'm strongly leaning town on her reactions - BUT - she hard to read so.