awesome dude
here is my original case on HH. Please do scan it for bias etc. You will find that i conducted the analysis with complete neutrality, and you will also find that HH looks incredibly scummy.
Honorary Hitchiker Analysis
Post 1-Random Vote.
Lurks for about 5 pages, with no excuse given.
Post 2-Threatens to put Geddingsworth at -1. No reason given, nor any suggestion of prior suspicion of him. Instead, places an FoS, in order to allow potential hammer later.
Post 3-Admits to following the crowd in suspicion of Geddingsworth.
Post 4-Follows the lead of CKD and asks a question to Geddingsworth, which I don’t really understand.
Post 5- Infers that he has been watching the game, but not posting. Confessed lurking.
Then uses The Greg’s argument to place further suspicion on HazzelQ.
Post 6- Accuses Nelly and HazzelQ of lurking. Rather ironic I feel.
Post 7-Use of persuasive techniques in order to BW HazzelQ-putting him at -1 I believe. Poor logic, and an incredibly scummy vote.
Post 8-After being questioned by Geddingsworth, he backtracks a little, promising to unvote when HazzelQ explains himself.
Post 9-Backtracks further, claiming that he didn’t even mean the vote as permanent. He simply wanted an explanation. This is not odd in itself, but when compared with the fact that HH has, up till this point, been VERY reluctant to use his vote, its out of character for him to wade in like that.
Post 10- Explanation given. Again, lurking is brought up, which is a tad hypocritical.
Post 11- Backtracks completely now, claiming that because he has met resistance with his vote, he will withdraw it, in the hope that he can escape further pressure.
More Lurking.
Post 12-Comments a little, by reiterating events. Then claims that I misinterpreted Greg, and HoS’s me- (see what I mean about his strange vote earlier?). Could suggest that he KNOWS Greg to be town. Doesn’t commit himself further.
Post 13-Accuses me of OMGUS. Nothing wrong with that really.
Post 14-Asks what part of his post didn’t make sense. Hopefully this post should answer that. If not, he can try writing his case against me again, and I’ll gladly explain fully why it is flawed.
Vote: HonaryHitchhiker
BM
Your best bet is probably to read HH's posts in isolation yourself. I wouldnt blame you for being wary of trusting me, which is why i'm trying to appeal to your intellect, and encourage you to read for yourself.
If you read HH, and you don't see blatant scum who is gagging to be lynched, then vote Greg. At least no-one will be able to say that you didn't weigh up both options carefully. If however, you see what i'm staring at now, then vote for HH. It would be great to eliminate 1 scumbag before we even use our actions.
BM
