In post 2400, Drixx wrote:I would normally say something like this in private, and in hydra, but I want to make it clear who is speaking.
@Dramonic - You seem to have misunderstood something I said and then publicly chastised me because you misunderstood. I quite clearly said thatIFI thought someone had done something bad enough to warrant being force replaced or mod killed, I wouldn't be having a conversation in the thread to try and tone things down a notch, but instead would say something privately. I wasn't fishing for any action on your part, but rather trying to handle it without you needing to get involved.
In post 2392, Cerberus v666 wrote:@Mod: If someone were to invent a desperado gun use to someone, as you said was possible above, and said gun use was aimed at scum, what would happen? If it were aimed at town, what would happen? If they instead invented a "desperado gun", rather than a "desperado gun use", what would the occur upon usage of the gun in both those cases?
In post 2394, Cerberus v666 wrote:Can a Lucid Dreamer invent a killing ability to someone which functions under the same conditions as those imposed by the desperado role, where the shooter dies when they target town, and the target dies when they target scum? If so, what phrasing would they need to use to invent such an ability to someone?
In post 2400, Drixx wrote:I would normally say something like this in private, and in hydra, but I want to make it clear who is speaking.
@Dramonic - You seem to have misunderstood something I said and then publicly chastised me because you misunderstood. I quite clearly said thatIFI thought someone had done something bad enough to warrant being force replaced or mod killed, I wouldn't be having a conversation in the thread to try and tone things down a notch, but instead would say something privately. I wasn't fishing for any action on your part, but rather trying to handle it without you needing to get involved.
In post 2388, dramonic wrote:Votecount 14: This is not cool.
Elbirn (3): Jeanne11, Learned Hand, itlepip
Shiro (2): zmuffinman, EAP
itlepip (2): Roleplay25, 3dicerolling
Davsto (2): DiamondSentinel, Davsto
DiamondSentinel (1): ErrantParabola
Learned Hand (1): Elbirn
ErrantParabola (1): Klingoncelt
Not Voting: Cerberus v666, Shiro, sharky5x, mass flop
It is 9 to lynch.New Deadline is in 2 days
In post 2408, Cerberus v666 wrote:RP: What other reasons do you have besides the weak ass ones I provided?
In post 2408, Cerberus v666 wrote:
Elbirn, that might happen. I feel like a lot of people wouldn't mind seeing the slot go, but don't want to hurt town too much if we're wrong, since both those players are strong throughout, and only get stronger as the game goes on. I'm lazy and at work. I know you're saying they're lying, but spell out where and how this is happening. I find it improbable that they'd outright lie as either alignment, but especially unlikely as scum talking about someone elses day play, where it's easily disproven.
In post 2414, Learned Hand wrote:@Cerb, The scum motivation in riling up easy targets and mislynching them should be evident. I have work this afternoon. I will go into detail later.
In post 2413, RolePlay25 wrote:In post 2408, Cerberus v666 wrote:RP: What other reasons do you have besides the weak ass ones I provided?
You mean besides the fact everything he is doing is weak ass reasoning that goes "someone is playing scummy" rather than "I think someone is scum"? And chainsawing for TN? Yep, that's the reason for my vote. It's all preemptive posturing for the flip. It's not "I think someone is going to flip scum" it gives a perfect out "I just don't understand why town would play so poorly!"
Shall I pull an LH? I won't hammer Elbirn or Shiro even at deadline. We can no lynch if those are the options.Oh, and that hydra is scum, by the by.
In post 2415, Jeanne11 wrote:I won't move from my only other scumread just because you disagree with it.
p-edit: I think he's scum because, well, his pushes were the players who were already pushed prior to his posts. Also, there is his doubt about how I know I and Sharky were investigative. The answer is, there's no 'and', there is 'or'. I knew one of us is an investigative because that's me. And I was right. Losing either of us is a disadvantage to town.
In post 2417, RolePlay25 wrote:In post 2414, Learned Hand wrote:@Cerb, The scum motivation in riling up easy targets and mislynching them should be evident. I have work this afternoon. I will go into detail later.
You are going to try to sell yourself and Muffin as "easy targets"? Like what, I decide to rile you guys up over Jeanne or Diamond because I'm looking for easy targets?
Hey Muffin, you think of yourself as an easy target now?
This hydra is lying, this hydra is scum and the lynch they're selling you is a lynch on town.
In post 2421, Elbirn wrote:In post 2415, Jeanne11 wrote:I won't move from my only other scumread just because you disagree with it.
p-edit: I think he's scum because, well, his pushes were the players who were already pushed prior to his posts. Also, there is his doubt about how I know I and Sharky were investigative. The answer is, there's no 'and', there is 'or'. I knew one of us is an investigative because that's me. And I was right. Losing either of us is a disadvantage to town.
...Jeanne this doesn't make any sense. Not even a little bit.
You said that losing either you or Sharky would be losing an investigative. Full stop.
I also have zero knowledge of your alignment, therefore even if you are town *I don't know that* and therefore can not know that I'd be pushing town and losing town an investigative role. Which you've completely destroyed the utility of by claiming it early AND claiming who your target tonight is going to be :/
