In post 2567, Cerberus v666 wrote:Dumb semantic argument is dumb. What Titus said was perfectly acceptable for communicating their point.
I really don't want to have to deal with isoing you RP. It basically hinges on your stance on TN and the sharky thing and the errant shot. If you were even the slightest bit shady in that, it's you over them. So, if you have any evidence you'd like to provide indicating that
1)You wanted the desperado shot to go to tn.
2) Once it went to EP, you wanted it used on tn.
3) You wanted tn lynched earlier in the game
Then, well, that would go a long way to making life easy for me.
I wanted sharky shot with the desperado shot, because I think that Sharky's claim and EP's claim are diametrically opposed. I still think that. I still do not think Sharky is town. I wanted TN lynched, since very early on.
If you think I'm going to ISO myself to make life easier for you, ehhhh... not feeling it. I'm sick to the eyeballs with people who can't even follow basic arguments about other people, now we've hit the level of lazy that you're asking me to ISO myself? How is that even a useful request? I have searched my ISO and discovered I am town! A surprise has occurred!
I know I'm town because Dramonic says so. Every single thing I have done is town, because that is my alignment. I haven't really given a fig how they would look to you, because frankly I don't care. If you can't be bothered to read my posts, sheep me. Because I am sure as shit reading LH's.
Dismissing what I said as a semantic argument? No. Knowing whether there's 1+ millers or 2+ millers is stupidly important. That is anything but semantics.