Micro 565: The Walking Dead Ep. 1(Game Over)

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I have nothing to say to her than what I have already said.

I believe absinthe is town and I dislike ETL's push on her. Nothing else to say on the matter as of now.

I think 'ignoring' is a little extreme as well. Has she addressed something directly to me that I have not responded to?

[No Brainer]

So your reasoning for voting the man who sold the world is basically that his reasoning behind one post looks fake.
Are you actually confident in that push? Or am I missing something?

Also yeah mollie let's double team this guy!
c:
-Cheet

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I believe TheMan's questioning/read on absinthe feels forced and I'm more than happy to push it on page 5.

[No Brainer]

Also you dislike ETL's push on her but you agreed with one of her points?
Heh?
Isn't it a little dissonant for you to be saying now that you think her entire push was bad when a page or two ago you were essentially appeasing her?
-Cheet

[No Brainer]

Like it seems kind of wonky for you to be like "oh man ETL's push was bad and absinthe is town" when you agreed with a reason that she gave for her being scummy?????
-Cheet.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I was?

I'm pretty sure I agreed with one point but disliked her other point. Are you arguing that scum cannot produce good reasons for scum reading someone?

[No Brainer]

I have nothing to say to her than what I have already said.

I believe absinthe is town and I dislike ETL's push on her. Nothing else to say on the matter as of now.

I think 'ignoring' is a little extreme as well. Has she addressed something directly to me that I have not responded to?

^ scumposting!

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Mollie, have you ever, even once, read me correctly? Serious question.

[No Brainer]

OK, but if she was looking for information...why wouldn't she vote? She is following up on the question so I'm not sure how it's appeasing.

Second point I kind of agree with though.

So.
You're saying the first point is likely to come from scum.
Walk me through why.
-Cheet.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I don't understand what you're asking.

[No Brainer]

Mollie, have you ever, even once, read me correctly? Serious question.

I think so. but if I haven't you shld probably fix that.

as in if you are town pretend to play towards a town wc.

the man's read on absinthe doesn't feel forced. he is calling her out on her use of meta while she was condemning some1 else's. what is forced about that.

you are throwing shade on etl. with no follow up. like I said, it looks like you are more interested in breaking up an anti/etl bloc rather than develope a read on her. cos I feel like you have better reasons to pursue her than you do the man and I wld like to know why.

[No Brainer]

I believe absinthe is town and I dislike ETL's push on her.

OK, but if she was looking for information...why wouldn't she vote? She is following up on the question so I'm not sure how it's appeasing.

Second point I kind of agree with though.

If you like the second point, what is so scummy about ETL's push on absinthe that you were actively trying to discredit anti calling her town?
-Cheet.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I explain it right there in the post you quoted - I don't understand ETL's push on absinthe. But I agreed that scum can give the 'I'll vote if I think one of you are scum' line to look like they have reads.

[No Brainer]

Why is "I don't understand" or "this push is wrong" immediately something worth calling someone scummy for?
How often does town incorrectly read something or push something?
You're admitting it's possible that you just aren't understanding something about her push right?
Why wouldn't you wait to understand before trying to discredit her?
-Cheet.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

When I say I don't understand it what I mean to say is I don't like it. Should be more specific with my wording I guess.

I fully understand why ETL was pushing absinthe, but I don't like it. I also don't like this defence of Anti/ETL that you got going on.

[No Brainer]

Do you dislike it because it's relentless?
;D

You also still haven't explained what about it you dislike specifically.
-Cheet

[BlueBloodedToffee]

It doesn't make sense to me, I don't see how absinthe's actions were attributed to her being scum. I explained why in a post to ETL.

[No Brainer]

So.. again, why couldn't this be a clarification issue?
I'm just not seeing the connect between "I don't understand this point" and "ETL is scummy".
If you don't understand something, does that immediately make you think that person is more likely to be scum?
-Cheet.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Yes.

[No Brainer]

So if ETL made a follow-up post being like "blah blah blah elaboration on reason blah blah blah"
and it made sense to you, you would take her out of the scumbin?
-Cheet

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Yep.

[absinthe]

I miss the first No Brainer.

This game is slow.

do we have a history in that you don't seem to wanna play with me

I don't think so. I can see why the post looked like I was taking a swipe at the second No Brainer, but I wasn't. My reason for missing the first one was in the post. The game was doing nothing last night. He(?) got things moving on page 1 earlier.

[absinthe]

Are you ready to talk about why you 1v1'd TMWSTW?

[No Brainer]

When I say I don't understand it what I mean to say is I don't like it. Should be more specific with my wording I guess.

I fully understand why ETL was pushing absinthe, but I don't like it.

I also don't like this defence of Anti/ETL that you got going on.

it works like this: player x can read player z, and player z can read player y. player y can read player z who can read player x. from my experience this is pretty accurate altho not all of the time due to mitigating circumstances.

what part of this process do you not like

[BlueBloodedToffee]

What if player x and player z are scum?

What if their reads are wrong?