Does it mean that I'm scum? Does it mean that I'm wrong?
Shouldn't you be trying to convince me that I'm misguided instead of passively commenting on my methods?
Well i mean you are blackmailing him, "Do as i say or ill kill that guy you like"
Second, i'm pointing out a somewhat shady method. It's not enough for a scumread on it's own but i don't like it.
Third, can you elaborate on your scumread on me? I know you've pointed to some posts but this is the first time you've had some reasons for it.
I don't know what this proof ranger has that phantom is town but i want to hear it before deciding about phantom. Start has been unhelpful from the, well start, so i consider him a decent lynch for D1. even if he's not scum, he's dead weight so far and that hurts town.
Well i mean you are blackmailing him, "Do as i say or ill kill that guy you like"
Second, i'm pointing out a somewhat shady method. It's not enough for a scumread on it's own but i don't like it.
If I point out several town games where I've said similar games will you that influence your thinking at all?
Third, can you elaborate on your scumread on me? I know you've pointed to some posts but this is the first time you've had some reasons for it.
You talk like you think like scum.
I don't know what this proof ranger has that phantom is town but i want to hear it before deciding about phantom. Start has been unhelpful from the, well start, so i consider him a decent lynch for D1. even if he's not scum, he's dead weight so far and that hurts town.
Well i mean you are blackmailing him, "Do as i say or ill kill that guy you like"
Second, i'm pointing out a somewhat shady method. It's not enough for a scumread on it's own but i don't like it.
If I point out several town games where I've said similar games will you that influence your thinking at all?
I don't personally like it, but if it's normal for you then welp. that's why it wasn't enough for a scumread.
I don't know what this proof ranger has that phantom is town but i want to hear it before deciding about phantom. Start has been unhelpful from the, well start, so i consider him a decent lynch for D1. even if he's not scum, he's dead weight so far and that hurts town.
Are you Phantom's scumbuddy?
I would think Ranger would be the more likely scumbuddy in a scum phantom situation, but maybe that's just me. If ranger really has no good reason to clear Phantom that's two likely scum right there. and if he does, thats two likely town there.
In post 43, lane0168 wrote:If he's serious, I'd put him on a scum lean. If he's just throwing stuff out there, it's null
This doesn't make any sense to me
Idk how to put it any more clearly
Pro town thing to do is get out of rvs asap
A serious vote does that
Just throwing stuff out there for that sake of throwing it out there comes off as filler to me
Lane when you're off v/la your input on this would be appreciated
Sorry been a few days so I'm trying to remember where my head was at.
What I meant was if he was serious about his reads, that includes me and Ranger as being scum but he unvited ranger. If he wasn't then he was possibly reaction fishing or just throwing filler. That's why that's null to me.
I understand you're probably way past this but I'm catching up
rkvothe wrote:Too easy for scum to hop on while giving no reasons. Look, he's at L-3 with not much reasoning behind the votes.
This is a good point!
lane wrote:How?
Literally every post of yours is filled with scum motivation.
PhantomCobalt wrote:Get a room: PhantomCobalt, Ranger, Flubbernugget
While I realize the value of having a room to share reads, I must decline: time spent in a room is time spent not in-thread, and I feel my presence is absolutely required in order to get a lane lynch in.
I really hope I find a better answer than that bs excuse of a scum read explanation
I don't personally like it, but if it's normal for you then welp. that's why it wasn't enough for a scumread.
I feel like if you were town you'd be a lot less laissez-faire about it.
I would think Ranger would be the more likely scumbuddy in a scum phantom situation, but maybe that's just me. If ranger really has no good reason to clear Phantom that's two likely scum right there. and if he does, thats two likely town there.
This is a really weird post. What's your reads on Phantom and Ranger?
My reads on Phantom and Ranger are that it will be really easy to sort them D2 and Start's been scummy enought that i can put off dealing them until more information is public.
As for seeming too Laissez-faire, it was always more of an "I've got my eye on you" type thing. I didn't think it was serious on it's own.
Well the reason i'm doing what i'm doing is because i can get 2 name either on or off my scumlist just by lynching a lesser scumread D1, so not really. I don't really see a downside to waiting on ranger from a town perspective. Do you?
What if Ranger is town but Phantom is scum?
What if Ranger is scum but Phantom is town?
Your play has so many assumptions inherent in it that it makes me strongly suspect that you don't want Phantom getting lynched for reasons you're not telling.
Worst case scenario. We'll prbably end up lynching both of them but 1 for 1 is a bad trade for scum.
What if Ranger is scum but Phantom is town?
Scum trying to protect town to look good and get a doc on him to save him from the other scumteam. I could see it. I think Ranger probably wouldn't get away with this though, he kinda promised the moon and the stars so not delivering would be a good reason for a lynch. The hard part is proving Phantom innocent after. may end up being another 1 for 1.
Why are you assuming that Town!Ranger will be able to sway the crowd but ONLY if Phantom is scum?
Why are you assuming that Scum!Ranger won't be able to regardless of Phantom's alignment?
And why do I get the feeling that you want to lynch Ranger first either way?
I am here. Reading now. I am going to hate restrictions but they'll help me as a player. Highlights from players are helpful. If you townread our slot, feel free to reach out. :nod: