In post 5431, Lowkey wrote: In post 5429, DiamondSentinel wrote:I mean, it's great he flipped scum and all, but a scum who's powers are unlocked when he's lynched? That's SOOOO obviously a scum-lead wagon. Honestly, I find CooLDoG's much more town-led. Even though he flipped town, it gave scum a golden opportunity to point out that dangerous people were on a town wagon while they were on a scum one. I may not be the best at this, but even I can recognize just how scum benefits from yesterday's events.
Please stop. You are not good at this game and working out alignments. Not being rude, just saying it how it is. The truth is brash. Max's wagon was town-initiated; I made the case for it and pushed it. Max campaigned directly against ABR
the entire day
and that's when ABR's suspicion of Max-scum started.
2407 and
2408 is where it all began.
Yeah, he probably got bussed by buddies; that doesn't mean he was a great idea to lynch or scum benefited in any way by losing a strongman(or w/e role goes through docs) and 5-time RB. Cooldog was a fairly easy read as town too and the general notion going around that he might not be a good idea was town-initiated too. Scum can jump on it, sure, but painting it as anything else is absurd. Just because the people in the party with you and confirmed town was on the wagon does not mean it was "much more town-led".
Scum did not make a counterwagon to cooldog with their own buddy on purpose.
Seriously. There were so many other possible pushes that had received a decent amount of attention and votes earlier in the day(itle/sky/KC/flum) that really only had token voices raised against them. Unless those other options were ALL scum, the beginning of MP's wagon was *very* likely town driven. Unfortunately, that's only the first few names. After that point, there was the pressure to get the double lynch etc. going, so it greatly diminishes the value of those portions of the wagon as being indicative of town. ESPECIALLY considering nobody ever had any problem voting Max, everybody only raised concerns if they were being asked to vote CD.
DP: Correct me if I'm wrong(I super duper might be), but I think at least one of your heads was in favor of KC as town, or at least as someone that you'd be able to clearly classify later on. Was the willingness to vote KC/exasperation that she wasn't lynched yet indicative of dissonance, or have the two of you arrived at the conclusion that you believe KC is more likely scum than town?
-Cerb
pedit: I feel like it's more likely scum would have preferred to keep the 1x deathproof in reserve. As strong as 5x roleblock is, given the claims yesterday(alternating BP doctor, perma BP into perma deathproof, a double lynch enabler that's extremely likely town and about to become nearly impossible to kill), if scum wanted MP 's other abilities activated, it would have been for the strongman, not the RB...which begs the question, why does scum MP reveal his RB, and lie about the number of targets he can have? Maybe I'm overthinking this? I guess I need this question confirmed.
@Mod: In the case of MP's flipped role, would he have been able to both submit the factional kill, AND use his roleblock?
If he could have only done one, rather than both, him revealing the roleblock doesn't make sense in the case where they were deliberately attempting to get his powers activated, because it means they were activating said power for the sake of the roleblock, rather than the strongman, which doesn't seem as strong with the known claims? Am I just bad in thinking strongman>5x roleblock on N1, with these claims?
Anyways, the point is, in spite of the incentive to get him lynched, it seems improbable that the roleblock would be a good enough reason to put a member of a scum team at risk, so that begs the question of why didn't a slot who had claimed to be BP get shot instead of EP, if a lynch was actually planned...