NY 193 : Werewolf Mania (GAME OVER- TOWN WIN)

Nero Cain · Post Post #1275 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:33 am

In post 1264, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:
Zulfy

In post 684, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 632, Nero Cain wrote:In post 628, Zulfy wrote:
Explain this

If Black is scum he'd know mine and Ika's alignment. If Ika is town there is scum motivation in diffusing a TvT fight.

Of course, it would depend on what scum would try to achieve, but I would say that, more often than not, there would be more scum motivation in not diffusing a Town vs Town fight.

Would you care to respond to this?

Probably not. He has responded to very little else that I've said to him. Can't imagine that he'd start now. He's actually really high on my scum list. How would you feel about lynching him today?

I'd be ok with it.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1276 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:39 am

In post 1270, JarJarDrinks wrote:@BlackStar

Who would be your fist choice to lynch today? And who else would u be willing to lynch?

In post 1271, BlackStar wrote:Firebringer is my top scum read followed by pisskop

So ur first choice for todays lynch is the uncountered seer claim?

Xkfyu · Post Post #1277 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:45 am

In post 1275, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1264, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:
Zulfy

In post 684, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 632, Nero Cain wrote:In post 628, Zulfy wrote:
Explain this

If Black is scum he'd know mine and Ika's alignment. If Ika is town there is scum motivation in diffusing a TvT fight.

Of course, it would depend on what scum would try to achieve, but I would say that, more often than not, there would be more scum motivation in not diffusing a Town vs Town fight.

Would you care to respond to this?

Probably not. He has responded to very little else that I've said to him. Can't imagine that he'd start now. He's actually really high on my scum list. How would you feel about lynching him today?

I'd be ok with it.

Anyone else have any interest in lynching Zulfy today?

BlackStar · Post Post #1278 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:48 am

Yes, the claim by the lurker who replaced the most suspicious person in the game. The only reason you have to lurk is if you have something to hide. Most of us who are fairly active right now are probably town. We should be trying to bring out the scum who think they can hide in the shadows and win without doing anything.

Zulfy · Post Post #1279 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:58 am

Sorry I have been having trouble focusing.

Give me some time, just need a little time

Zulfy · Post Post #1280 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:00 am

In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:
Zulfy

In post 684, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 632, Nero Cain wrote:In post 628, Zulfy wrote:
Explain this

If Black is scum he'd know mine and Ika's alignment. If Ika is town there is scum motivation in diffusing a TvT fight.

Of course, it would depend on what scum would try to achieve, but I would say that, more often than not, there would be more scum motivation in not diffusing a Town vs Town fight.

Would you care to respond to this?

I agree with x and disagree with you.

Zulfy · Post Post #1281 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:01 am

+1 on x, inactivity is not much to go off

Nero Cain · Post Post #1282 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:03 am

In post 1280, Zulfy wrote:
In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:
Zulfy

In post 684, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 632, Nero Cain wrote:In post 628, Zulfy wrote:
Explain this

If Black is scum he'd know mine and Ika's alignment. If Ika is town there is scum motivation in diffusing a TvT fight.

Of course, it would depend on what scum would try to achieve, but I would say that, more often than not, there would be more scum motivation in not diffusing a Town vs Town fight.

Would you care to respond to this?

I agree with x and disagree with you.

you know X understands where I'm coming from right?

Some Random Mafia Player · Post Post #1283 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:04 am

In post 1281, Zulfy wrote:+1 on x, inactivity is not much to go off

hes not lynching you for inactivity, hes lynching you for not responding to anything.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1284 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:05 am

like that doesn't even make sense.

daykill:Zulfy

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1285 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:10 am

In post 1265, BlackStar wrote:
In post 1262, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1259, BlackStar wrote:That was right after he said that even if snarky was scum, he still trusted his reads.

What's your read of Almost right now?

Null

So then what happened between you voting for him and now that's made u change ur read?

Zulfy · Post Post #1286 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:10 am

Same thing, dont feint

Zulfy · Post Post #1287 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:11 am

I havent responded cuz I havent been active.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1288 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:13 am

zulfy you are about to die, why are you not throwing out reads and views on the gamestate?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1289 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:14 am

In post 1277, Xkfyu wrote:Anyone else have any interest in lynching Zulfy today?

Wouldn't hate it but have several people I'd prefer to lynch first.

Some Random Mafia Player · Post Post #1290 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:14 am

In post 1288, Nero Cain wrote:zulfy you are about to die, why are you not throwing out reads and views on the gamestate?

Simply put, this post is right.

BlackStar · Post Post #1291 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:15 am

In post 1287, Zulfy wrote:I havent responded cuz I havent been active.

How is that a good excuse?

Zulfy · Post Post #1292 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:15 am

Nero's dagger is blunt

Xkfyu · Post Post #1293 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:15 am

In post 1283, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 1281, Zulfy wrote:+1 on x, inactivity is not much to go off

hes not lynching you for inactivity, hes lynching you for not responding to anything.

Well, to be fair, the inactivity certainly hasn't helped, as I'll probably never have anything better than a null read on an inactive. Inactives just look like lurkers to me, and I believe they should be treated as such, until they either increase their activity or replace out (in the case of it being true inactivity).

However, when an inactive player all of a sudden shows up in the thread when his name is being thrown around as a lynch candidate, it makes me extremely suspicious that said inactive player has really been here the whole time, and has just been choosing to not post (ie. lurking).

BlackStar · Post Post #1294 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:17 am

In post 1285, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1265, BlackStar wrote:
In post 1262, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1259, BlackStar wrote:That was right after he said that even if snarky was scum, he still trusted his reads.

What's your read of Almost right now?

Null

So then what happened between you voting for him and now that's made u change ur read?

Other people started acting more suspicious than him

pisskop · Post Post #1295 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:22 am

Zulfy is town. This is just going out on witchhunts now.

pisskop · Post Post #1296 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:24 am

I find it interesting that jarbar has ignored/dodged several questions about his own play.

Xkfyu · Post Post #1297 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:24 am

In post 1295, pisskop wrote:Zulfy is town. This is just going out on witchhunts now.

You said this before, but you gave no reasoning for it. What is it that makes you think that?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1298 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:24 am

nopenopenopenope

RICASTLE TODAY END STORY.

we can look at jarar 2mrw

Xkfyu · Post Post #1299 (ISO) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:26 am

In post 1289, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1277, Xkfyu wrote:Anyone else have any interest in lynching Zulfy today?

Wouldn't hate it but have several people I'd prefer to lynch first.

I hear ya. So, here's why I am right now. I want to lynch Almost50. He's by far my biggest lynch candidate. I'd be fine with lynching pisskop, simply for SilverWolfs behavior that we discussed before. I'd also be fine with a Blackstar lynch.

Zulfy is quite a strong scum read for me, and I'd prefer to lynch him over Blackstar or pisskop. I have serious reserves about the Ricastle wagon, though. I mean, even if he is scum, there are an awful lot of my scum reads on that wagon.

I do realize that that only means that it's extremely likely that I'm just wrong about at least some of them. But even knowing that, it is still bothering me.