In post 1865, Ranger wrote:Sure, but my case on Expedience is not based on meta. It's based on impact. He's had none.
Impact is not alignment indicative.
In post 1865, Ranger wrote:Sure, but my case on Expedience is not based on meta. It's based on impact. He's had none.
In post 1870, Gorkington wrote:its just "x thing is scummy from y player.
vote: y player"
youre really reading that as town?
In post 1872, Gorkington wrote:probably phantom are town.
What's there to discuss? I've been telling you you're right about Ankamius and wrong about Expedience, told you why I felt you were wrong about Expedience, and am letting you continue reading for why other players (e.g. PhantomCobalt, Spiffeh, Wisdom) are town.Gorkington wrote:i might just stop rereading and votepark if all of my effort is going to end up getting continually roadblocked by two people refusing to actually discuss things with me.
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO ARTICULATE! THANK YOU!you really think ank is being genuine this game?
literally all of his pushes that ive read to this point are wooden and have no weight behind them.
he never once gets ACTUALLY paranoid about someone.
theres no fire.
its just "x thing is scummy from y player.
vote: y player"
youre really reading that as town?
i mean literally this though.In post 1876, Wisdom wrote:In post 1870, Gorkington wrote:its just "x thing is scummy from y player.
vote: y player"
youre really reading that as town?
And how is that different than usual Ank?
like.Ranger wrote:What's there to discuss? I've been telling you you're right about Ankamius and wrong about Expedience, told you why I felt you were wrong about Expedience, and am letting you continue reading for why other players (e.g. PhantomCobalt, Spiffeh, Wisdom) are town.
This.Gorkington wrote:i mean literally this though.
he finds one reason.
and ties his vote to that.
theres no hunting.
Totally get that, actually. I understand what you mean.like.
its hard to articulate.
but i feel like you and wisdom are so absolutely entrenched in your reads that talking about anything is pointless.
youve both already made up your minds and i feel like im largely wasting my time if im expecting any kind of dynamic interaction with either of you.
In post 1884, Ranger wrote:Firebringer having mentioned every other player except for Ankamius and Expedience.
In post 1891, Scatterplot wrote:Assuming that the scum are doing framejobs because Firebringer, who died without ever speaking to the rest of the scumteam, selfhammered, is dumb.
In post 1843, Ranger wrote:I definitely agree the modus operandi of the scumteam is framing people.Wisdom wrote:Ashnard was probably killed in order to point to me, given his declaration of me being confscum and such
It's almost as if I said this yesterday about someone else!
Someone who I could have sworn I said was being framed by Firebringer, which you ignored me on! Wonder why.