Mini 1758: Game Over


User avatar
Elyse
Elyse
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Elyse
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6363
Joined: February 8, 2013

Post Post #450 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:41 am

Post by Elyse »

Pause.

ika lurks as scum.

I am 99.99% sure he is scum.

It's his biggest tell and he does it without fail.

VOTE: ika

Please follow me here. I promise.

I forgot ika was in this game until Cakez reminded me. (Cakez this will give you townpoints. Hop on!)
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
RadiantCowbells
He/him
Smooth Criminal
User avatar
User avatar
RadiantCowbells
He/him
Smooth Criminal
Smooth Criminal
Posts: 70855
Joined: February 24, 2013
Pronoun: He/him

Post Post #451 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:43 am

Post by RadiantCowbells »

Ika is very busy with IRL stuff atm so I wouldn't read too much into that.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
User avatar
acryon
acryon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
acryon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4635
Joined: July 10, 2014

Post Post #452 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:44 am

Post by acryon »

In post 450, Elyse wrote:Pause.

ika lurks as scum.

I am 99.99% sure he is scum.

It's his biggest tell and he does it without fail.

VOTE: ika

Please follow me here. I promise.

I forgot ika was in this game until Cakez reminded me. (Cakez this will give you townpoints. Hop on!)

If you're going to keep trying to use meta to lead wagons, this is going to be a very long game.
Get to know me! | Unavailable on nights and weekends.
User avatar
tictac
tictac
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
tictac
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2737
Joined: May 24, 2015

Post Post #453 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:52 am

Post by tictac »

In post 450, Elyse wrote:I promise.

I'll hold you to that
VOTE: Ika
User avatar
tictac
tictac
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
tictac
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2737
Joined: May 24, 2015

Post Post #454 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:58 am

Post by tictac »

In post 451, RadiantCowbells wrote:Ika is very busy with IRL stuff atm so I wouldn't read too much into that.

He does have posts elsewhere.
User avatar
Performer
Performer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Performer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4142
Joined: August 6, 2015
Location: California

Post Post #455 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:25 am

Post by Performer »

VOTE COUNT 1.09


SirCakez (4): curiouskarmadog, Camn, a plain farmer, RadiantCowbells
RadiantCowbells (3): ika, acryon, UpTooLate
ika (2): Elyse, tictac
tictac (1): SirCakez
Elyse (1): Lokiben

No Vote (2): Zulfy, Some Random Mafia Player

With 13 players alive, it takes 7/13 votes to lynch.

For deadline & notes, please refer to this post – post !
I’m an informed Miller who knows there isn’t any Loyal modifiers and there is a total of 4 scum.
-Morality
I'm easily the best person in the game at mechanics. I don't presume to be the best at anything else.
-Jingle
People tried
-RadiantCowbells
User avatar
acryon
acryon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
acryon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4635
Joined: July 10, 2014

Post Post #456 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:27 am

Post by acryon »

In post 453, tictac wrote:
In post 450, Elyse wrote:I promise.

I'll hold you to that
VOTE: Ika

What reasoning do you have to sheep Elyse here?
Get to know me! | Unavailable on nights and weekends.
User avatar
tictac
tictac
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
tictac
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2737
Joined: May 24, 2015

Post Post #457 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:30 am

Post by tictac »

In post 456, acryon wrote:
What reasoning do you have to sheep Elyse here?

I townread her strongly, and I believe meta is a valid reason to suspect someone.
User avatar
acryon
acryon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
acryon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4635
Joined: July 10, 2014

Post Post #458 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:36 am

Post by acryon »

In post 457, tictac wrote:
In post 456, acryon wrote:
What reasoning do you have to sheep Elyse here?

I townread her strongly, and I believe meta is a valid reason to suspect someone.

You believe it's valid enough to have literally zero other reasoning?

And why do you strongly townread her?
Get to know me! | Unavailable on nights and weekends.
User avatar
tictac
tictac
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
tictac
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2737
Joined: May 24, 2015

Post Post #459 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:57 am

Post by tictac »

In post 458, acryon wrote:
In post 457, tictac wrote:
In post 456, acryon wrote:
What reasoning do you have to sheep Elyse here?

I townread her strongly, and I believe meta is a valid reason to suspect someone.

You believe it's valid enough to have literally zero other reasoning?

Yeah. Pattern recognition is where humans are strong.
If you want more then it would be stupid of her to lie about this, because it's easily and un-ambiguously checked.


And why do you strongly townread her?

Early mindset had strong feeling of 'solve the game'.
Why would she push Cake when she could have joined my wagon?
Why would she now push Ika as scum? Even if Ika is town that's still a bad lynch for scum. They could have gotten an active townie instead.
User avatar
acryon
acryon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
acryon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4635
Joined: July 10, 2014

Post Post #460 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:02 am

Post by acryon »

In post 459, tictac wrote:
In post 458, acryon wrote:
In post 457, tictac wrote:
In post 456, acryon wrote:
What reasoning do you have to sheep Elyse here?

I townread her strongly, and I believe meta is a valid reason to suspect someone.

You believe it's valid enough to have literally zero other reasoning?

Yeah. Pattern recognition is where humans are strong.
If you want more then it would be stupid of her to lie about this, because it's easily and un-ambiguously checked.

Just because she's telling the truth doesn't mean it's a good reason.
In post 459, tictac wrote:
And why do you strongly townread her?

Early mindset had strong feeling of 'solve the game'.
Why would she push Cake when she could have joined my wagon?
Why would she now push Ika as scum? Even if Ika is town that's still a bad lynch for scum. They could have gotten an active townie instead.

While there is some validity to solving the game, without flips you can't really speculate on the other things. There are any number of reasons to do the things above as scum. Set up future lynches, stay off the main wagons, etc.
Get to know me! | Unavailable on nights and weekends.
User avatar
Elyse
Elyse
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Elyse
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6363
Joined: February 8, 2013

Post Post #461 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:13 am

Post by Elyse »

Normally I don't put much stock into meta but with ika it's different. I'm telling you.
User avatar
UpTooLate
UpTooLate
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UpTooLate
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2838
Joined: December 23, 2015
Location: Joisey

Post Post #462 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:22 am

Post by UpTooLate »

Ika really is posting all over the place. Just not here.

VOTE: Ika
User avatar
tictac
tictac
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
tictac
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2737
Joined: May 24, 2015

Post Post #463 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:24 am

Post by tictac »

In post 460, acryon wrote:Just because she's telling the truth doesn't mean it's a good reason.

Agree to disagree. As meta goes this is a really simple pattern. I think it's reliable.

While there is some validity to solving the game, without flips you can't really speculate on the other things. There are any number of reasons to do the things above as scum. Set up future lynches, stay off the main wagons, etc.

All kinds of things can be speculated on. Sure there isn't much good info on day 1, but there is much to be seen in what people do with the little they have. How they think in addition to how valid their thinking is.
If she just wanted to stay off the main wagon, she'd have pushed less.
I guess setting up future lynches might be valid on Cakes. I don't think it is on Ika. She'd be setting herself up for a fall in town-standing tomorrow for little reason to do so if Ika flips town.
User avatar
Some Random Mafia Player
Some Random Mafia Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Some Random Mafia Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 755
Joined: January 9, 2016

Post Post #464 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:34 am

Post by Some Random Mafia Player »

VOTE: ika

im fine with pressuring this slot.
User avatar
Elyse
Elyse
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Elyse
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6363
Joined: February 8, 2013

Post Post #465 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 8:06 am

Post by Elyse »

Also if ika flips scum, acryon dies next.

There is zero reason to oppose a wagon on a lurker at this point, even if its sole purpose is pressure.
User avatar
acryon
acryon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
acryon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4635
Joined: July 10, 2014

Post Post #466 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 8:10 am

Post by acryon »

In post 465, Elyse wrote:Also if ika flips scum, acryon dies next.

There is zero reason to oppose a wagon on a lurker at this point, even if its sole purpose is pressure.

I'm actually fine with pressuring lurkers. I am not fine with saying X person is 100% scum because they are lurking.
Get to know me! | Unavailable on nights and weekends.
User avatar
SirCakez
SirCakez
he/him
Is A Lie
User avatar
User avatar
SirCakez
he/him
Is A Lie
Is A Lie
Posts: 28225
Joined: June 18, 2015
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #467 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:29 am

Post by SirCakez »

VOTE: ika
Definitely agree this needs a wagon, my second highest scumread. Tictac is still scum though and I will be going over his ISO response soon.
User avatar
acryon
acryon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
acryon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4635
Joined: July 10, 2014

Post Post #468 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:06 am

Post by acryon »

@Mod
I'll be V/LA until Monday morning CST.
Get to know me! | Unavailable on nights and weekends.
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #469 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:18 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

Here, got 20 minutes or so. going back to page 13. this will catch up as a catch up post and notes for me to look back if I need to. I quote as I read.

In post 325, UpTooLate wrote:Why does RC only have 2 votes? He's literally just flipflopped between Tictac and Camn, and in between joked about being scum. There is literally nothing of substance, he's just hiding behind Camn and Tictac's interaction making comments about it.

VOTE: RadiantCowbells


dont like this vote. what would the scum motivation be for this?
EDIT Elyse concurs (329)

In post 333, Lokiben wrote:[quote="In Something I noticed from curiouskarmadog:






I think that posts like these, where he's asking for elaboration are a little ironic considering:





For that, an FoS.


calling bullshit here. first of all, something SC said here didnt make sense giving his vote. I was trying to catch him in a lie. and yes...I did vote UTL, what I find funny/scummy here is that instead of asking me why, you just gave me an "FOS". why are you not concerned witht he "why" of the vote?



what questions? You mean the one I asked you? You mean the I asked before I got busy and couldnt post? you mean that fucking question?



why not answer the question? I want to say this is a scummy post, but I think scum would just ignore it. soooo, why are you being obtuse? do you think that is helpful?
-

going to break up this post so it isnt a wall that people will ignore.
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #470 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:22 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

In post 450, Elyse wrote:Pause.

ika lurks as scum.

I am 99.99% sure he is scum.

It's his biggest tell and he does it without fail.

VOTE: ika

Please follow me here. I promise.

I forgot ika was in this game until Cakez reminded me. (Cakez this will give you townpoints. Hop on!)


man I had you on TeamTown until this. IF cakes flips scum, then this looks suspicious has hell.
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #471 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:23 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

In post 453, tictac wrote:
In post 450, Elyse wrote:I promise.

I'll hold you to that
VOTE: Ika


and this....except worse. take responsibility for your own vote.

Elyse, what game did you develop this meta from? have you been in games with him that he lurks as town?
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #472 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:25 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

what the fuck is this random ika wagon for a lurker a thing versus someone who is actually scummy?
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
SirCakez
SirCakez
he/him
Is A Lie
User avatar
User avatar
SirCakez
he/him
Is A Lie
Is A Lie
Posts: 28225
Joined: June 18, 2015
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #473 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:26 am

Post by SirCakez »

Hopefully this is readable. My responses are the words after the orange and end with a line break.
Spoiler:
In post 429, tictac wrote:
- Super off post, wanted to let camn squirm properly?

Why did ya sheep that post if ya felt it was off?
What is wrong with thinking early-day pressure is wasted on people who are VLA?

I sheeped the Random reasoning, not the stuff on Camn, Elyse, UTL and RC. The Random stuff was the only good part of that post.

and - Two waved questions, "should be obvious" and "you're missing the point" used to avoid answering questions
Ya. Answering with "I'm doing a reaction-test" would have been super productive

He was obviously interested in the purpose of the posts so yeah a good response would have been productive.

- Says his vote on RC for not using spellcheck is only 90% a joke?
I didn't vote RC for that. Not paying very much attention to how I vote as long as it isn't on you are ya? Explained the spellcheck thing in the post ya linked.

This is what I see from that post.
In post 94, tictac wrote:I think he did spell-check that one post. Bit weird RC being who he is. I'd vote on that if I didn't have better.

Not very good.

- This is basically the thing everyone started scumreading me for. Asks RC why he's still voting camn when it was pretty obvious RC wasn't going to explain at that point.
RC did answer in 97.

Yes with a basically joke.
In post 97, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm expressing my thoughts on the absurdity of Zulfy's post by proposing an equally absurd alternative.


- Implies he doesn't think unneccesary defense is scummy.
1) No it doesn't
2) why would it be scummy if I did think that?

Then what does it imply? And unnecessary defense is scummy because it's more likely to come from scum who wants to make sure they're being townread.

- Already dissected earlier why this was a terrible vote.
Meh. Didn't think was a joke. Still not sure it was, though it does seem to be the prevailing opinion here that it was.

Look at how Zulfy has been posting all game then review.

- Also already dissected why this vote was bad. Also jumps on Zulfy in the same post but never follows up.
quoting the relevant bit from earlier post

Uses the excuse of "she'll push me early as scum" and her thinking page 3 reasons is scummy to vote which are both bad reasons.
Why are these bad reasons?

An early push just because she buddied you last time isn't indicative of scum. And overwrought page 3 reasons are scummy.

The "not having an avatar is scummy" part is also bad because there's no scum motivation in that push
"I want to look like I have scumreads" is a scum motivation

Yeah there were a lot better things to use to look like she had scumreads at that point.

since no one agreed with her and she was taking a ton of flak for it but kept her stance.
She didn't keep the stance. "Lets be real tho- pressure votes are pressure votes. "

She kept the no avatar is scummy stance.



- Asks a pointless rhetorical question to RC
RC was scumreading me, but wanting to wagon Ika. I thought it was weird so I asked why. How is this either pointless or rhetorical?

He was the first vote on your wagon, he obviously thought you were scum.

- Uses ika being in the game to say camn is pushing a mislynch, which is terrible reasoning.
Why?

You said camn was trying to run you up quickly so ika would hammer which is absurd since you weren't even close to L-2.

- Admits that basically his entire scumread on camn is based on meta and nothing else.
"The policies stated as scumreads, the surfacy reading, the exaggerated confidence, 'this is squrming'."
'this is squirming' is the only part in that that isn't scummy even without meta.
And what exactly is scummy about having a meta read?

The meta read isn't the scummy part, it's the fact it's all based on meta. As you said
In post 278, tictac wrote:Everything the same.

So you're basing it all on meta.

- Gives a bunch of unreasoned town reads, super fluffy
Ya. Trying to break up a TvT is clearly scum motivated :roll:
Farmer read is cause I noticed him trying to do the same thing when I first tried to post.

All you did was drop three town reads and leave. I didn't see any intention of trying to stop a TvT.
User avatar
SirCakez
SirCakez
he/him
Is A Lie
User avatar
User avatar
SirCakez
he/him
Is A Lie
Is A Lie
Posts: 28225
Joined: June 18, 2015
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #474 (ISO) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:30 am

Post by SirCakez »

CKD I mean these questions.
Spoiler:
In post 179, curiouskarmadog wrote:UNVOTE:

In post 178, camn wrote:/yawn.

ITT Cowbells keeps repeating " camn might be scum", and all other players are forgotten.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: UpTooLate

Why?
Check the ISO.


What about it do you think is scummy?

It is easy to say "check the ISO" but what about it do YOU find scummy?

In post 210, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 208, RadiantCowbells wrote:They're my scumpartners.

we're yolo wagoning everyone.


so no opinion then?

In post 254, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 243, camn wrote:
In post 205, curiouskarmadog wrote:who here do you supposed will "read the iso"?

Anyone who is interested in finding scum?

Lets be real tho- pressure votes are pressure votes.
I gotta get back to bussing

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tictac




wait a minute, what the fuck? who is scum?


In post 317, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 314, SirCakez wrote:

I wanted RC to share his case since everyone was sheeping that and he had (and still hasn't) given next to no reasons.


can you explain this a little further, where did you ask RC to share anything?

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”