I'll quote it again:
In post 466, SilverWolf wrote:He also does not hammer willy nilly anymore either and if he tries that shit, he knows he'll have to deal with me when the game is over and it won't be pretty.
Why should I have expected a hammer? ika had made no indication that he thought Shadow was scum, and had made no indication that L-2 was pseudo-L-1.
In post 581, Something_Smart wrote:And why are you so concerned with who has or hasn't mentioned whom? Feels like manufacturing reasons.
...If people aren't giving out reads, that's scummy - or at least, helpful to scum. Public reads mean you're somewhat locked into an opinion and can't just change on a whim or go with the flow (without being called out for it), and that when you die everyone else has something to work with. So if not giving reads is bad, then not mentioning people at all is
even worse
, since I have no idea what they're thinking. And in this specific case, had no idea ika was going to hammer.
The other thing is, I think it's better to give out scum reads than town reads (it's good to
have
town reads; they're just less valuable to give out). I thought Snarky had a similar opinion, given these pair of posts:
In post 150, Something_Smart wrote:I have decent townleans on beeboy and masquerade.
Slight townleans on shadow, supreme, snarky and aristo.
Not sure about the rest.
But then the rest of Snarky's ISO is just giving town reads (without any reasoning) until the end of the day with some lynch alternatives for Shinobi (also without reasoning).
So Snarky: do you really think it's important to give scum reads as you indicated in 151? And if so, why didn't you give any for almost the entirety of Day 1?
Never put off until tomorrow what you can avoid doing entirely.