Spoiler: quote wall + reads so y'all actually have to open the spoiler
In post 68, kirroha wrote:I'm curious. Do you find BBT's mention of a possible policy lynch on you scummy, or are you just annoyed by it (but think it is a null tell)?
Hmmph.
-
kirroha's 107 feels too defensive.
-
In post 127, Raskolnikov wrote:Let's dispel once and for all this fiction that Kirroha doesn't know what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing. Kirroha is undertaking a systematic effort to change this game, to make 1762 more like the rest of the world. We don't want to be like the rest of the world, we want to be 1762. And when I'm elected president, this will become once again, the single greatest nation in the history of the world, not the disaster Kirroha has imposed upon us.
Is this a scumread?
-
kirroha's 128 is kinda bad.
-
In post 130, NinoMasaki wrote:VOTE: Syndesis I agree that this is a better wagon to push (In My Honest Opinion). Who comes in, says nothing and jumps on the biggest wagon they can see?
And I do not think Ink is innocent now just because he explained himself. His reason is dumb and just looks like he is tunneling on the simplest thing he can find. Just because he is aggressive does not mean he is good at what he is doing. At least senpai made some sense.
Why are you defending kirroha so...strongly? In fact, I really, really don't see the kirroha townread but this is a less scummy post than 128 at least.
In post 171, RadiantCowbells wrote:who wants to bet BBT kill scumteam?
Why?
something something preflip associatives?
In post 174, ShortcutButton wrote:In post 171, RadiantCowbells wrote:who wants to bet BBT kill scumteam?
Have they even interacted?
Are you objecting to this thought? If so, why is interaction a prerequisite of an associative read?
-
{RC, IAI, implosion}
{Kill, ink, Ras, tojam, Rubixxx}
{kirroha, Nino, Shortcut, BBT}