In post 319, Rob14 wrote:I think it's L-1. T S O unvoted then voted again, and I see four other votes. You still have time to complete your bus if you care to, YT.
No, I wasn't.
In post 319, Rob14 wrote:I think it's L-1. T S O unvoted then voted again, and I see four other votes. You still have time to complete your bus if you care to, YT.
In post 575, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 319, Rob14 wrote:I think it's L-1. T S O unvoted then voted again, and I see four other votes. You still have time to complete your bus if you care to, YT.
No, I wasn't.
In post 579, SirCakez wrote:In post 575, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 319, Rob14 wrote:I think it's L-1. T S O unvoted then voted again, and I see four other votes. You still have time to complete your bus if you care to, YT.
No, I wasn't.
The second post was a misinterpretation of the term bussing according to 553, not an intent to hammer.
In post 581, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 579, SirCakez wrote:In post 575, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 319, Rob14 wrote:I think it's L-1. T S O unvoted then voted again, and I see four other votes. You still have time to complete your bus if you care to, YT.
No, I wasn't.
The second post was a misinterpretation of the term bussing according to 553, not an intent to hammer.
That makes no sense.
In post 583, SirCakez wrote:In post 581, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 579, SirCakez wrote:In post 575, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 319, Rob14 wrote:I think it's L-1. T S O unvoted then voted again, and I see four other votes. You still have time to complete your bus if you care to, YT.
No, I wasn't.
The second post was a misinterpretation of the term bussing according to 553, not an intent to hammer.
That makes no sense.
Then ask YT. It mostly makes sense to me.
In post 425, Dwlee99 wrote:Yo elyse what do you think of my reads that aren't yt?
pedit: Lol aafter you scum?
In post 568, SirCakez wrote:When do you plan to share the contents of the file?
In post 445, Venmar wrote:In post 428, Rob14 wrote:It's important in the next day if you flip town. It's not important now, because we all think you're scum.
You're either scum or incredibly anti-town, I am completely against this mindset. It devalues everything dwelee could do; you're suggesting he's going to die regardless of what he does. It also shows you're very narrow-minded by saying "it's not important, we all think you're scum!", it's not good scumhunting and shows you're committed to just lynching him. A lot of people on the site do this but i'm always against the idea of just lynching people for the hell of it, it's not a healthy strategy. Trying to rush a scum is something scum have a lot of motivation to do and little reason for town to do.
In post 593, Rob14 wrote:In post 445, Venmar wrote:In post 428, Rob14 wrote:It's important in the next day if you flip town. It's not important now, because we all think you're scum.
You're either scum or incredibly anti-town, I am completely against this mindset. It devalues everything dwelee could do; you're suggesting he's going to die regardless of what he does. It also shows you're very narrow-minded by saying "it's not important, we all think you're scum!", it's not good scumhunting and shows you're committed to just lynching him. A lot of people on the site do this but i'm always against the idea of just lynching people for the hell of it, it's not a healthy strategy. Trying to rush a scum is something scum have a lot of motivation to do and little reason for town to do.
Give me a single example of something Dwlee could do at this point to prevent his lynch, given the fact that he's confirmed to have lied about the basis for his reaction to the dayvig.
In most cases, I'd agree with you. In this case, Dwlee is today's lynch, end of.
In post 458, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 453, Almost50 wrote:
2nd: I have decided Dwlee to be 3rd party but NOT a member of the main mafia group. There's NO WAY 12 or even 10 townies will agree on a lynch in the opening 24-48 hours. So it follows that 3-4 mafia are on that wagon, if not even all of them. TSO voted him then Titus (who is town to me) joined in and everybody started piling up line ants on sugar. He did make a slip (Dwlee; that is) that I can't see as an "innocent" one, but still doesn't justify the pile up on him like there was a "be won Dwlee's wagon" kind of win-con in their role PMs.
So, not town (bc he did tell a lie) and not mafia (bc they're voting him) = self-aligned 3rd party. Remains to be seen whether he is likely harmful, bc .. YES .. I have seen town-aligned 3rd party players (ex: Survivour Doctor). They may turn against the time in later stages of the game if needs be, but at the start of the game chances are they want the town to win fast so they can also win.
What is thissssss
In post 502, beeboy wrote:In post 501, Suzune wrote:Why would you be conf town exactly?
Well when Dwlee flips scum I will be showered in town reads for flash hammering him. Kinda like a pseudo conf town.
In post 592, Almost50 wrote:In post 568, SirCakez wrote:When do you plan to share the contents of the file?
When it looks a bit tidier and actually has more reads that do not look like "null; null; null; nul; ..."![]()
So fat only the 3 I mentioned I have reads on. I'm liking Venmar tbh, but I have yet to ISO him. Besides, all the players I've never played with I might need to do a quick search on them for previous games, and that takes time.
But if you insist on knowing my untidy scratch composition that doesn't even include doing ISOs yet:
A rate of ++ on each of CooLDoG & Elyse
A rate of + on YT2980 (before the recent posts)
A rate of - on TSO
A rate of -- on posp, grapes & Rob
The following didn't look too relevant, so I put it in a spoiler if you're interested.
Spoiler:
Everybody else are unmarked
In post 543, YT2980 wrote:What's wrong with theory? Please explain.