In post 674, Something_Smart wrote:Firebringer: Likely Unlikely
Why am I likely Ice?
In post 674, Something_Smart wrote:Firebringer: Likely Unlikely
In post 674, Something_Smart wrote:Looking solely at interactions between SW and SO and living players, this is where I stand as far as partners are concerned. This doesn't incorporate individual reads which I am still working on.
Aristophanes:LikelyPossible
Firebringer:LikelyUnlikely
Masquerade:PossibleLikely
Shinobi:UnlikelyUnlikely
SnarkySnowman:PossibleLikely
Viva La Gloria:UnlikelyLikely
In post 679, Viva La Gloria wrote:Why do you think that Fire (who replaced Aero btw) is not likely to be fire mafia?
I don't understand how you can possibly put firebringer in the same category as Shinobi here.
You need to do some heavy explaining of these reads.
The VCA I'm working on tells me neither you nor Shin are likely to be scum, but I'll get to that once it's done.In post 677, Viva La Gloria wrote:Like the associatives between SO and Shinobi are perfect for scumpartners but I really can't shake the feeling I've had all game that he's town.
Let's just lynch for Fire and I'll let the night actions handle him.
Yeah, I'm pretty much sold on Masq being the last Ice goon.In post 683, Firebringer wrote:I feel like masq and Snarky could be last two scum.
This is one of the worst posts. They voted town, unvoted to vote another town in defense of scum, and rather then giving a reason for the scumread, attacked Cobalt's logic.In post 251, Masquerade wrote:In post 231, beeboy wrote:Although being on a wagon with Supreme Overlord is troubling as I have a bad gut feeling about him.
VOTE: Beeboy
Dammit
In post 246, Cobalting wrote:VOTE: Supreme Overlord.
Eh, still not fully comfortable with ikaespeciallygiven multiball, but beeboy's right.
Not gonna share a wagon with him.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Cobalting
Different scumteams, I'd like Cobalting out first.
Dafuq is the problem sharing a wagon with scum if it is on other scum?! We can only lynch 1 a day you know.
In post 685, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Firebringer
Probably ice, not sure what Viva was thinking, interactions with SO are terrible.
I'd also probably be ok lynching masq or snarky.
That's okay. They're probably the last Fire goon anyway.In post 686, Firebringer wrote:In post 685, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Firebringer
Probably ice, not sure what Viva was thinking, interactions with SO are terrible.
I'd also probably be ok lynching masq or snarky.
You are scum reading all three players?
Okay...
In post 688, Aristophanes wrote:That's okay. They're probably the last Fire goon anyway.
Looking again at the VCA (which I'll take some time and transcribe onto the forum soon. It's in a word document atm.) I noticed they avoided early major wagons, instead staying on Viva. That is, until they found L-1 on the Shinobi wagon. They then stayed there until the day ended, despite the wagon's crumbling. Her votes here are contrary to Silver for the most part.In post 689, Firebringer wrote:In post 688, Aristophanes wrote:That's okay. They're probably the last Fire goon anyway.
Why do you think SS is fire goon anyways?
In post 685, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Firebringer
Probably ice, not sure what Viva was thinking, interactions with SO are terrible.
I'd also probably be ok lynching masq or snarky.
@Mod: I will be away until Tuesday. I will probably have access but there's a chance I won't and so I'm declaring V/LA just in case.
In post 694, Viva La Gloria wrote:I think SW/Aeronaut's interactions were awful and that's the main reason I'm on FB.
In post 697, Something_Smart wrote:@Viva: I kind of see what you mean, but after Fire replaced in he did scumread and interact with SW, whereas he soft defended SO and dropped it when his wagon became serious.