In post 8548, Drunken Pirates wrote:In post 8546, Drixx wrote:Varsoon refused to answer this question no matter how I phrased it. TCC claims that it's only people who have a killing ability on their role card.
and you don't find that fishy? likeat all?
How is it fishy? Varsoon shouldn't be confirming or denying any part of our claim. Given that the win con itself is what the question is, not how he would adjudicate something, he would need to confirm what a win con is in order to answer the question.
Unless you mean you find my win con fishy. And if so, how is it fishy? How is it any fishier than any other non-standard win con given to a 3p?
-Cerb
pedit: Yosarian, ZZZX, who we know is town, confirmed that his track of her on N2 was not successful, and no one has claimed they blocked him. There is no reason why DGB couldn't have a role which simply reflexively did what GWS' role did to anyone that targeted her, OR just be unaffected by things while punishing people for targeting her. I don't understand your skepticism with regards to my supposition. It certainly makes more sense than giving scum two slots with targeted roleblocking hatred, to me at least.