In post 6438, Firebringer wrote:Okay here are my actions:
Night 1: No action
Night 2: pirate mollie
Night 3: DeathNote
Night 4: No action
Night 5: Golden Robster
Isn't it slightly convenient that everybody you've listed off has claimed VT.
Did you not ask for everybody's roles BEFORE revealing your results.
My inquiry is two fold: why did you think it was reasonable to wait and why did you not pursue rob day start as scumhunting does not require you reveal information a conclusion about someone does. I dislike your presentation immensely.
In post 6452, pieguyn wrote:i think there's about a 0% GR was shot. no offense to GR but i don't think he'd get killed over for instance JJD (or PC-slot if mollie's slot was town read as hard as i'm town reading it).
i don't think you would be shot either unless it is 3 mafia, since 4 mafia or 3 mafia/traitor would imply no SK in the setup. AKA i'm pretty sure Fire's result is a guilty.
I'm saying that he potentially no killed me or I was attacked. I'm sticking to the traitor theory.
It would make sense for scum fire to implicate me with his fake claim. Added by the fact that we've probably still got a traitor running loose, he's taking a gamble and trying to mislynch me.
That would bring town down to 5 players and I'm pretty sure Fire already knows who the traitor is.