In post 224, KainTepes wrote:don't try to trick me!!! I know your sentence doesnt make sense, so are you calling me or RadiantCowballs douchebaggery??
i'm trying not to trick your sentence. it senses makes a lot. why are you not answering me?
In post 224, KainTepes wrote:don't try to trick me!!! I know your sentence doesnt make sense, so are you calling me or RadiantCowballs douchebaggery??
In post 212, Lapsa wrote:In post 201, Performer wrote:I guess we'll just agree to disagree as clearly you believe fake claims are an oh-so-fabulous strategy for us to win against scum.
i don't believe that. town fake claims are dangerous. it didn't work out well
but i disagree that it was a total failure and that it was all my fault
In post 227, Lapsa wrote:@garm
depends on lot of things. even in circus game that move had a chance to end up being brilliant
speaking of kain - perhaps so. although i would expect faster adaptation
about boon - that's kind a his regular play. heavy lurking and a lot of bullshit.
fun fact: Titus refused to replace in a game because it had boonskies in it. i don't blame her
fun fact #2: boonskies likes to instahammer when there's an opportunity
well - at the moment i'm not feeling scumvibes out of perf.
although your perspective seems kind a sensible and genuine - i'm gonna fence sit on perf
I mostly voted MarioManiac because I felt he was scum, and maybe I'm not entirely sure why I felt that.
In post 227, Lapsa wrote:@garm
depends on lot of things. even in circus game that move had a chance to end up being brilliant
The fact he is eager to claim now probably indicates he is town and scum I think he would be very hesitant to do so according to tos meta.
Performer comes off as incredibly scummy. What I noticed is his habit to push his own version into things. Like my original vote on lapsa he was saying was that because of last game. Then 146 was him trying to put anyone on the same wagon after him in a bad light even through it was rvs. I think his going for low hanging fruit with his vote on kain and boon.
In post 230, Performer wrote:it wouldn't
In post 218, iraonavp wrote:InsidiousLemons, are you satisfied with the current position of your vote?
In post 237, RadiantCowbells wrote:at first I was afraid
I WAS PETRIFIED
KEPT THINKING I COULD NEVER LIVE WITHOUT YOU BY MY SIDE
In post 176, Boonskiies wrote:Okay.
In post 147, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 135, Lapsa wrote:@kain vote is sufficient and you are ignoring me
No it really is not. You are asking questions but not a whole lot of actual input and posting VC's. Looks like a tryhard.
In post 240, RadiantCowbells wrote:lapsa if you don't unvote me I will vote you and literally never unvote you for the remainder of the game until one of us dies.
this includes lylo.
In post 240, RadiantCowbells wrote:lapsa if you don't unvote me I will vote you and literally never unvote you for the remainder of the game until one of us dies.
this includes lylo.
In post 247, KainTepes wrote:In post 240, RadiantCowbells wrote:lapsa if you don't unvote me I will vote you and literally never unvote you for the remainder of the game until one of us dies.
this includes lylo.
What??? This is obnoxious how does this help town??? Ulness you actually THINK Lapsa is scum and you said nothing about Lapsa being scum before!!
VOTE: RadiantCowbaells