In post 974, SnarkySnowman wrote:Can we please lynch Smart? I'd rather no-lynch than lynch Firebringer I think.
I actually like Aristo and Smart for the remaining scum.
Why?
In post 974, SnarkySnowman wrote:Can we please lynch Smart? I'd rather no-lynch than lynch Firebringer I think.
I actually like Aristo and Smart for the remaining scum.
In post 977, Something_Smart wrote:Because if you're not lynched you'll be nightkilled, so you'll lose regardless?
...or did you want to invent a reason town!you would say that?
This is absolutely scum. Masquerade, please hammer.
In post 978, Aristophanes wrote:I so called this counterwagon XD
Just a pat on the back to myself.In post 980, Firebringer wrote:In post 978, Aristophanes wrote:I so called this counterwagon XD
GOod job?
Possible scum, yes. But I don't know that this is required right now.In post 983, SnarkySnowman wrote:So aristo hop on the wagon with us
In post 985, Shinobi wrote:I still don't get why people are laying off of FB.
Did I miss a memo or something?
In post 986, SnarkySnowman wrote:Not many hours till deadline, but tbh I'd rather no lynch than lynch Firebringer (because I think he's town)
In post 988, Viva La Gloria wrote:I've been thinking about this at length and I think that a no lynch is actually quite good.
Both scum will most likely attempt to cross kill and if they succeed we could end up with groups of people cleared.
I can't make up my mind between SS and Masq atm. I'd prefer if we forced scum to shoot each other here.
It gives us a ton of information and since today is in effect MyLo I think it's probably the best answer.