Yarrrrgami cannot even vote properly
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
In post 284, Randomnamechange wrote:Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.
In post 309, Aneninen wrote:In post 249, 3dicerolling wrote:There is one more pirate going under the radar, and he's starting to ping scummy.
Which one?
This one below?
In post 254, Aronis wrote:Srry guys. I forgot about this.
And just policy lynch them with me snarky. So much easier then having to ask for a translation every five seconds.
One more post about policy lynches and I'll DayVig you. Regardless of what kind of PR I actually have.
In post 255, Aronis wrote:So umm what did I miss?
See above!
Why?
I'm all ears.
In post 285, Xkfyu wrote:However, we already have claimed 3rd parties. So, assuming they aren't town fake claiming 3rd party, we can guarantee that we don't lynch town.
I can't see any benefit for a townie faking a Third Party PR. However, I can seedamn good reasonsfor a Mafia (or a Third Evil) to fake Third Party PR.
Actually Xkfyu's 289 pretty much explains everything.
And why for the sake of all the dancing little nymphs need we care how much the other third parties will resent us? The Neutral Killing is someone we should get rid of, and the same goes for eg. Cult/Auditor (their WinCon don't match ours). What you're saying might be true for certain Neutral Benign PR-s but we don't even know whether they exist at all.
In post 306, droog wrote:couldnt "town random" become "vt"?
No.
Random Townies are PRs randomized from the Town-PR categories. There's one Government, Protective, Investigative and Killing. The other three could fall into any of those categories. (With certain restrictions.)
In post 308, SnarkySnowman wrote:I'm down with a massclaim. I am Busdriver.
Stop massclaiming.
That's how we started going down last time.
Also, I think this claim was actually fake.
In post 322, SnarkySnowman wrote:Please claim Aronis.
In post 332, SnarkySnowman wrote:what's a VI?
Aronis wrote:In post 309, Aneninen wrote:In post 249, 3dicerolling wrote:There is one more pirate going under the radar, and he's starting to ping scummy.
Which one?
This one below?
In post 254, Aronis wrote:Srry guys. I forgot about this.
And just policy lynch them with me snarky. So much easier then having to ask for a translation every five seconds.
One more post about policy lynches and I'll DayVig you. Regardless of what kind of PR I actually have.
In post 255, Aronis wrote:So umm what did I miss?
See above!
Why?
I'm all ears.
In post 285, Xkfyu wrote:However, we already have claimed 3rd parties. So, assuming they aren't town fake claiming 3rd party, we can guarantee that we don't lynch town.
I can't see any benefit for a townie faking a Third Party PR. However, I can seedamn good reasonsfor a Mafia (or a Third Evil) to fake Third Party PR.
Actually Xkfyu's 289 pretty much explains everything.
And why for the sake of all the dancing little nymphs need we care how much the other third parties will resent us? The Neutral Killing is someone we should get rid of, and the same goes for eg. Cult/Auditor (their WinCon don't match ours). What you're saying might be true for certain Neutral Benign PR-s but we don't even know whether they exist at all.
In post 306, droog wrote:couldnt "town random" become "vt"?
No.
Random Townies are PRs randomized from the Town-PR categories. There's one Government, Protective, Investigative and Killing. The other three could fall into any of those categories. (With certain restrictions.)
In post 308, SnarkySnowman wrote:I'm down with a massclaim. I am Busdriver.
Stop massclaiming.
That's how we started going down last time.
Also, I think this claim was actually fake.
See above??? See what above what??
And town won last game? Or did I miss a game of this? Idk
In post 323, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 316, Xkfyu wrote:In post 309, Aneninen wrote:In post 308, SnarkySnowman wrote:
I'm down with a massclaim. I am Busdriver.
Stop massclaiming.
That's how we started going down last time.
Also, I think this claim was actually fake.
Considering that this was the second time he has actually claimed, and that no one actually agreed to a mass claim, I'd say it's a pretty good bet that it's fake.
Then why are you not voting here?
In post 327, Aronis wrote:
Do feel free to explain why you think no lynching is a good choice. Because its not that obvious.
In post 331, Aronis wrote:In post 322, SnarkySnowman wrote:Please claim Aronis.
With 2 votes? One of which is from a person who has been out to get me from game start and the second from someone mindlessly sheeping them. So neither of which are very credible. Not to mention you've played like a complete VI. I'll pass up this opportunity, tyvm.
In post 332, SnarkySnowman wrote:what's a VI?
In post 279, shos wrote:If aronis was scum in secret hitler, he is here too
In post 343, shos wrote:trust me
In post 318, Xkfyu wrote:And we are getting a N1 result list REGARDLESS of the outcome of the lynch. Why do you people keep acting like we're not?
In post 322, SnarkySnowman wrote:Please claim Aronis.
In post 334, Yarrrrgami wrote:How about we all play one o' me favorite games for long voyages like this.
It be called "Stop talkin' to the snowpirate, he be a jestin' deckhand."
The rules be pretty self-explanatory.
In post 335, Firebringer wrote:Yarrgami, I like you. But I don't think Snow is a jester. That is jsut a easy way to dismiss him.
In post 336, Randomnamechange wrote:He was reffering to SORM Ihe missed the game not you. In that game town got screwed over by a massclaim (especially my fault)
In post 345, Aneninen wrote:In post 318, Xkfyu wrote:
And we are getting a N1 result list REGARDLESS of the outcome of the lynch. Why do you people keep acting like we're not?
Who said that?
In post 345, Aneninen wrote:In post 342, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 341, shos wrote:
VOTE: aronis
This should be 5.
Is there a reason for that, or are you just hopping on a wagon?
Wait-oh. You did the very same right before Shos...
Or was that a pressurizing vote to make Aronis post something relevant?
In post 346, Xkfyu wrote:Who said what? That we are getting a N1 result list? Or the ones that are acting like we're not?
In post 347, Aneninen wrote:In post 346, Xkfyu wrote:Who said what? That we are getting a N1 result list? Or the ones that are acting like we're not?
Who made a correlation between NoLynch and N1 results?
As for the other part, I asked the same in my post.
In post 275, Randomnamechange wrote:@droog we are getting no where with discussion and will probably hit town, we get a huge amount of night info that can help discussion. There's a reason this setup generally starts with day 0
In post 284, Randomnamechange wrote:Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.
In post 315, shos wrote:No, it's not 'clearly', lol.
This setup is less of a mafia game and more of a holy-shit-wtf-game.
so basically just trying to figure out what the hell is going on is a good part of why I offered nolynch
getting a N1 result list could be useful.