Borderlands Mafia [GAME OVER]

Nero Cain · Post Post #4775 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:45 pm

My kingdom for a dayvig.

Though it is pretty funny that both scum factions think I'm on the other faction.

Suzune · Post Post #4776 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:46 pm

In post 4771, beeboy wrote:
In post 4766, Suzune wrote:This does raise a good point. Does anyone really need two commuters?

Doc + Bodyguard.
Cop + Gunsmith.
Courier + Neighborizer.

The same can be said about all these roles.

Yeah I know. Gladiator + Supersaint
I know everything seems to be in pairs. It is the two of the same that interest me.

ISO · Post Post #4777 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:48 pm

What is Courier? I had never seen the role before so I thought it was something new but evidently not.

beeboy · Post Post #4778 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:48 pm

In post 4776, Suzune wrote:Yeah I know. Gladiator + Supersaint
I know everything seems to be in pairs. It is the two of the same that interest me.

Sigh...
I think this will just escalate things eyen further but I am only a eyen night commuter.
I just didn't want people to waste actions on me/ be nked.

beeboy · Post Post #4779 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:48 pm

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mailman

ISO · Post Post #4780 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:48 pm

That's pretty shifty.

YT2980 · Post Post #4781 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:49 pm

My main issue, beeboy, is that you're criticizing my gameplay when your gameplay is practically a mirror of mine, let's be real, we've both been wishy-washy, target-hopping, etc. and you seem to completely neglect that. I can tell you haven't really been reading my posts, and it's almost like you're deliberately ignoring them. And why would you do that as town? I recognize a double standard when I see one, but wanting to day vig me when I'm playing a somewhat identical game to you and you calling me scummy af for it is just odd.

beeboy · Post Post #4782 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:50 pm

In post 4781, YT2980 wrote:My main issue, beeboy, is that you're criticizing my gameplay when your gameplay is practically a mirror of mine, let's be real, we've both been wishy-washy, target-hopping, etc. and you seem to completely neglect that. I can tell you haven't really been reading my posts, and it's almost like you're deliberately ignoring them. And why would you do that as town? I recognize a double standard when I see one, but wanting to day vig me when I'm playing a somewhat identical game to you and you calling me scummy af for it is just odd.

I am reading you posts which ones am I ignoring. o.o

Nero Cain · Post Post #4783 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:51 pm

well that makes a little more sense. Though You calling it an "auto commuter" kinda seems off. Like you claimed your real role and got slack for it so you backtracked.

beeboy · Post Post #4784 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:52 pm

{A50, Nero, TSO} is my lynch pool

I would yig you since I can't kill you if that clears anything up for you YT. I haye been frustrated today tbh. Sorry.

YT2980 · Post Post #4785 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:52 pm

After bringing up the crumbs, this was your response. The crumbs had nothing to do with this, so I take it you didn't read that post in it's entirety. There were a couple other instances, but this is the one I remember offhand.

In post 4726, beeboy wrote:YT I said many times I won't lynch you since you will be cross killed.

beeboy · Post Post #4786 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:53 pm

In post 4783, Nero Cain wrote:well that makes a little more sense. Though You calling it an "auto commuter" kinda seems off. Like you claimed your real role and got slack for it so you backtracked.

I was trying to think what it would flip

Eyen-Night Commuter
Odd-Night Commuter
Eyerynight Commuter seemed off.
So I went with Auto Commuter.

ISO · Post Post #4787 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:53 pm

The claim makes more sense now.
But what I don't like is how he fakeclaimed in the first place.

beeboy · Post Post #4788 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:53 pm

In post 4719, YT2980 wrote:Did you crumb your role at all earlier in the thread?

In post 4720, beeboy wrote:Um as far as I am aware no.

I responded in the next post.

beeboy · Post Post #4789 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:54 pm

In post 4787, SirCakez wrote:The claim makes more sense now.
But what I don't like is how he fakeclaimed in the first place.

Because scum know when they can kill me which is bad now

YT2980 · Post Post #4790 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:56 pm

In post 4788, beeboy wrote:
In post 4719, YT2980 wrote:Did you crumb your role at all earlier in the thread?

In post 4720, beeboy wrote:Um as far as I am aware no.

I responded in the next post.

Different reply. I was talking about the crumbs I posted in the thread. Not pertaining to any crumbs you posted.

beeboy · Post Post #4791 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:57 pm

Did I ask you to crumb your role?
If so that was misunderstanding... oops.

YT2980 · Post Post #4792 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:57 pm

Ugh. Who is scum anymore? Your claim seems somewhat believable.

beeboy · Post Post #4793 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:57 pm

Oh I asked you to point out things in the wiki not for you to crumb your role.
Is this the misunderstanding?
Sorry about that :/

beeboy · Post Post #4794 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:57 pm

Nero is scum and is trying to start a wagon on the weakest aliye player (aka me)

Nero Cain · Post Post #4795 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:58 pm

WHA WHA WHA

YT2980 · Post Post #4796 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:59 pm

In post 4724, YT2980 wrote:I don't recall getting a definitive answer on whether or not you saw my crumbs, but I may as well post them anyway just to ensure you are aware of them.

Elyse crumbed her role nicely BTW, much more orderly than I did.

In post 4270, YT2980 wrote:
In post 1446, YT2980 wrote:There is a method to my madness in why I'm so audacious and upfront about things, the reason for which will remain unsaid until the time is ripe.

Here was one of my crumbs. I couldn't be lynched, so this was basically saying that I wasn't scared of posting anything. My purpose was to be audacious.

In post 4271, YT2980 wrote:
In post 1654, YT2980 wrote:How ironic. So what you're saying is we can't actually lynch you?

Directed towards pisskop earlier in the game.
The irony is I can't be lynched.

In post 4272, YT2980 wrote:
In post 1802, YT2980 wrote:
In post 1687, Rob14 wrote:
In post 1592, Suzune wrote:
In post 1591, YT2980 wrote:This day phase is gonna be weird. I think we kinda have to band together on at most 2 target at a time and see how they react under pressure, and if the response is good enough, move elsewhere from there.
It is an unusual strategy but I support it. If the pressure is not there then the mafia will not worry this ensures a response.

Why YT thinks he has the town cred to lead the town today is unknown, btw

For goodness sake, I'm not doing what I'm doing because I think I have the town cred. I'm doing it for a different reason entirely, and I'm not quite ready to tip my hand to scum.

That reason is because I can't be lynched for what I say, so why not say it anyway? Makes me less of a nk target for scum.

In post 4273, YT2980 wrote:
In post 2281, YT2980 wrote:Actually,
Vote: pisskop
on account of horrible town play if he is town and because thinking about it. However, I'm on to wgeurts if he flips town, and will consider a aafter's earlier post to be a distancing attempt.

Pisskop, if you're town, you do have no excuse to be "info-lynching", hedging, among other things. I was probably overthinking things, in light of the knowledge that this would entail an unnecessarily huge target on your back if you're scum and would be almost Rob level of gutsy in terms of it being a scum ploy.

Gah! I'm so wishy washy. I just like to consider all feasible scenarios. There's no reason for me not to in this given game, which differs from others and you'll see why later.

Specifically the last paragraph, no reason for me not to because of my lynchproof.

In post 4275, YT2980 wrote:
In post 3055, YT2980 wrote:Whatever, there is honestly no need for me to be explaining myself, nor no motivation. Save it for another day phase in which I am lynchable...

I will say nicole: town typically neglects things and go based off their memory, so I'm just trying a new strategy now knowing some of the flips.

Honestly just lazy.

I think my role has made me kind of lazy, but especially made me lazy on the day in which the gladiator usage occurred since I essentially was guaranteed to survive 2 day phases if not nk'd.

In post 4276, YT2980 wrote:
In post 3316, YT2980 wrote:Just trying to forestall the prospect of town reaching disaster anytime soon. Forgive me.

Disaster = trying to lynch the unlynchable.

In post 4278, YT2980 wrote:
In post 3825, YT2980 wrote:Good luck getting me lynched btw.

In post 4726, beeboy wrote:YT I said many times I won't lynch you since you will be cross killed.

It was that in reply to the above.

YT2980 · Post Post #4797 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:00 pm

I took it as a reply to that since it was the only post I made in the interim between your last reply and that post.

beeboy · Post Post #4798 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:01 pm

I think it was a random post I was frustrated at that point in time sorry.

beeboy · Post Post #4799 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:01 pm

At this point in time I would probably shoot A50 not you tbh. Not ruling you out as potential scum though.