In post 176, clearance only wrote:In post 172, beeboy wrote:I think I ha\/e a pretty solid spot on PW and you guys are strawmaning the shit out of what is happening.
What exactly do you feel they (toog and mirhawk?) are misrepresenting?
-S
In post 179, Phoenix Wright wrote:In post 172, beeboy wrote:I think I ha\/e a pretty solid spot on PW and you guys are strawmaning the shit out of what is happening.
Lay down this solid case you have on me
In post 108, beeboy wrote:In post 106, Phoenix Wright wrote:He's not scum for tunneling me. He's scum because it sounds like all of his reasons for why he says that he thinks I'm scum are horrible and seem insincere
Whether or not I agree with that your reaction to the claims is much, much worse.
In post 220, Phoenix Wright wrote:In post 219, Radja wrote:In post 127, Dwlee99 wrote:Cleave seems genuine, and pw I've already explained. It is a T v T.
okay, scratch my last post
You're literally just agreeing with whatever everyone else says. Not to mention your extended period of inactivity
VOTE: radja
In post 239, Phoenix Wright wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?k ... mit=Search
Beeboy is active on other topics, but not here. Very suspicious
Clearly beeboy is a homestuck troll and that's his typing quirk...In post 256, Toogeloo wrote:Is the \/ thing you are doing some kind of role restriction, yes or no? If no, why exactly do you do it, cuz it's actually a little weird to read sometime.
In post 256, Toogeloo wrote:beeboy,you weretaking jabs at Phoenix and twisting every comment he made to make them seem scummier, all while mostly being on the sidelines of the argument. Phoenix was correct in saying that no matter what he posted, you were finding some way of making it look scummy.
Is the \/ thing you are doing some kind of role restriction, yes or no? If no, why exactly do you do it, cuz it's actually a little weird to read sometime.
In post 261, beeboy wrote:Show me where i twisted what he said plz.
In no way is his post discussing his wagon in any way. He is specifically referring to how cleavage was tunneling him.In post 139, beeboy wrote:In post 136, Phoenix Wright wrote:UNVOTE: I realized that cleavage isn't scum because if he was he'd know that they own would find him to be the most suspicious on day 2 after they saw me flip town. Pushing for my lynch this hard when he knows that I'm town would basically be suicide. So he's just dumb town
This un\/ote just feels like an attempt at discrediting your wagon.
Not what he said at all.In post 144, beeboy wrote:You said they where too stupid to be \/oting you as scum since it would be suicide. You literally reworded "I am towny af guise" but added an un\/ote.
Again, a total misrepresentation of what he actually said.In post 145, beeboy wrote:In post 143, Phoenix Wright wrote:In post 141, clearance only wrote:PW who's scum then?
You just backed down from the only hard stance you've taken so far.
Probably one of the people who have been free to lurk because you've been wasting everyone's time with your push. I'd say there's also a good chance that one of the people on my wagon is scum. I'll go look over everything again really quickly
Now your solution is lynching the lurkers
*claps*
In post 265, Toogeloo wrote:In no way is his post discussing his wagon in any way. He is specifically referring to how cleavage was tunneling him.
In post 265, Toogeloo wrote:
#2
Not what he said at all.In post 144, beeboy wrote:You said they where too stupid to be \/oting you as scum since it would be suicide. You literally reworded "I am towny af guise" but added an un\/ote.
In post 136, Phoenix Wright wrote:UNVOTE: I realized that cleavage isn't scum because if he was he'd know that they own would find him to be the most suspicious on day 2 after they saw me flip town.Pushing for my lynch this hard when he knows that I'm town would basically be suicide.So he's just dumb town
In post 265, Toogeloo wrote:
#3
Again, a total misrepresentation of what he actually said.In post 145, beeboy wrote:In post 143, Phoenix Wright wrote:In post 141, clearance only wrote:PW who's scum then?
You just backed down from the only hard stance you've taken so far.
Probably one of the people who have been free to lurk because you've been wasting everyone's time with your push. I'd say there's also a good chance that one of the people on my wagon is scum. I'll go look over everything again really quickly
Now your solution is lynching the lurkers
*claps*
In post 267, beeboy wrote:Feel free to keep trying but nothing I said is wrong lol.
What does that have to do with the wagon on him?In post 266, beeboy wrote:Exactly saying someone is tunneling = discredit as tunneling is bad.
I'm specifically referring to you stating he's claiming a defense of how townie he himself is, which he's not doing. He justified why he thought cleavage is more than likely town and why it was no longer important for his vote to be there and nothing more. You are painting him to look worse with the way you phrase it.In post 266, beeboy wrote:He did say that. I bolded it for you.
Again, you are painting his statement as worse than what he actually said. He said nothing about Lynching All Lurkers. He said some scum are probably there (which to be honest is a fair [and obvious] assessment considering how little input was given from anyone else by the time of that statement), but he also said there might be someone on him as well that is along for the ride. I feel this to be quite possible as well, and your comments are the ones that make you my target.In post 266, beeboy wrote:He said he didn't know who the scum one but it is probably one of the lurkers.
That literally again is what he said.
In post 257, Dwlee99 wrote:Their V key is broken, toog.
In post 271, Toogeloo wrote:What does that have to do with the wagon on him?
In post 271, Toogeloo wrote:I'm specifically referring to you stating he's claiming a defense of how townie he himself is, which he's not doing. He justified why he thought cleavage is more than likely town and why it was no longer important for his vote to be there and nothing more. You are painting him to look worse with the way you phrase it.
In post 271, Toogeloo wrote:Again, you are painting his statement as worse than what he actually said. He said nothing about Lynching All Lurkers. He said some scum are probably there (which to be honest is a fair [and obvious] assessment considering how little input was given from anyone else by the time of that statement), but he also said there might be someone on him as well that is along for the ride. I feel this to be quite possible as well, and your comments are the ones that make you my target.
