In post 106, Phoenix Wright wrote:He's not scum for tunneling me. He's scum because it sounds like all of his reasons for why he says that he thinks I'm scum are horrible and seem insincere
Whether or not I agree with that your reaction to the claims is much, much worse.
Translation: "You're right, but I don't want to say so, because that's going to make my case that your reaction was terrible."
VOTE: beeboy
[/quote]
Full of crap I didn't mean that at all. I just didn't feel like arguing with PW about the claims Clea\/age made against him.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
The misrep is I already explained why I am \/oting PW and honestly not much has changed. He is just poking jabs at literally anything he can and it just feels like a bad attempt to look like he is scum hunting.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
taking jabs at Phoenix and twisting every comment he made to make them seem scummier, all while mostly being on the sidelines of the argument. Phoenix was correct in saying that no matter what he posted, you were finding some way of making it look scummy.
Is the \/ thing you are doing some kind of role restriction, yes or no? If no, why exactly do you do it, cuz it's actually a little weird to read sometime.
In post 256, Toogeloo wrote:Is the \/ thing you are doing some kind of role restriction, yes or no? If no, why exactly do you do it, cuz it's actually a little weird to read sometime.
Clearly beeboy is a homestuck troll and that's his typing quirk...
taking jabs at Phoenix and twisting every comment he made to make them seem scummier, all while mostly being on the sidelines of the argument. Phoenix was correct in saying that no matter what he posted, you were finding some way of making it look scummy.
Is the \/ thing you are doing some kind of role restriction, yes or no? If no, why exactly do you do it, cuz it's actually a little weird to read sometime.
Uh my \/ key is broked.
Show me where i twisted what he said plz.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
In post 136, Phoenix Wright wrote:UNVOTE: I realized that cleavage isn't scum because if he was he'd know that they own would find him to be the most suspicious on day 2 after they saw me flip town. Pushing for my lynch this hard when he knows that I'm town would basically be suicide. So he's just dumb town
This un\/ote just feels like an attempt at discrediting your wagon.
In no way is his post discussing his wagon in any way. He is specifically referring to how cleavage was tunneling him.
#2
In post 144, beeboy wrote:You said they where too stupid to be \/oting you as scum since it would be suicide. You literally reworded "I am towny af guise" but added an un\/ote.
In post 141, clearance only wrote:PW who's scum then?
You just backed down from the only hard stance you've taken so far.
Probably one of the people who have been free to lurk because you've been wasting everyone's time with your push. I'd say there's also a good chance that one of the people on my wagon is scum. I'll go look over everything again really quickly
Now your solution is lynching the lurkers
*claps*
Again, a total misrepresentation of what he actually said.
In post 144, beeboy wrote:You said they where too stupid to be \/oting you as scum since it would be suicide. You literally reworded "I am towny af guise" but added an un\/ote.
Not what he said at all.
In post 136, Phoenix Wright wrote:UNVOTE: I realized that cleavage isn't scum because if he was he'd know that they own would find him to be the most suspicious on day 2 after they saw me flip town.
Pushing for my lynch this hard when he knows that I'm town would basically be suicide.
In post 141, clearance only wrote:PW who's scum then?
You just backed down from the only hard stance you've taken so far.
Probably one of the people who have been free to lurk because you've been wasting everyone's time with your push. I'd say there's also a good chance that one of the people on my wagon is scum. I'll go look over everything again really quickly
Now your solution is lynching the lurkers
*claps*
Again, a total misrepresentation of what he actually said.
He said he didn't know who the scum one but it is probably one of the lurkers.
That literally again is what he said.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
In post 267, beeboy wrote:Feel free to keep trying but nothing I said is wrong lol.
All of it is wrong I wasn't tryin to discredit anyone and you completely ignored the part where I said that someone on my wagon is probably scum. You're also twisting around what I said about the lurkers. I know I'm town and it's obvious that the push against me has been the pivotal point of the game so far. So obviously the scum have been free to not post much and get away with it. I wasn't just saying "hurr durr lurking bad". I'm saying that you guys have been drawing attention away from people who are actually scum.
o.o It isn't wrong, your posts are sending the exact message I said they are sending.
It just isn't the only message that is being sent if you are following what I am saying.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
I'm specifically referring to you stating he's claiming a defense of how townie he himself is, which he's not doing. He justified why he thought cleavage is more than likely town and why it was no longer important for his vote to be there and nothing more. You are painting him to look worse with the way you phrase it.
In post 266, beeboy wrote:He said he didn't know who the scum one but it is probably one of the lurkers.
That literally again is what he said.
Again, you are painting his statement as worse than what he actually said. He said nothing about Lynching All Lurkers. He said some scum are probably there (which to be honest is a fair [and obvious] assessment considering how little input was given from anyone else by the time of that statement), but he also said there might be someone on him as well that is along for the ride. I feel this to be quite possible as well, and your comments are the ones that make you my target.
Essentially, your comments while he was being attacked by cleavage were a gross misrepresentation of what he actually said in an attempt to make him look worse. Your interpretations of his comments are shit.
In post 271, Toogeloo wrote:What does that have to do with the wagon on him?
He is discrediting one of the three people on it. 33% is a good chunk of the wagon.
In post 271, Toogeloo wrote:I'm specifically referring to you stating he's claiming a defense of how townie he himself is, which he's not doing. He justified why he thought cleavage is more than likely town and why it was no longer important for his vote to be there and nothing more. You are painting him to look worse with the way you phrase it.
If trying to get someone lynched is suicide how scummy are they?
He said getting him lynched was suicide aka he is saying he is towny, what part of that isn't clear?
In post 271, Toogeloo wrote:Again, you are painting his statement as worse than what he actually said. He said nothing about Lynching All Lurkers. He said some scum are probably there (which to be honest is a fair [and obvious] assessment considering how little input was given from anyone else by the time of that statement), but he also said there might be someone on him as well that is along for the ride. I feel this to be quite possible as well, and your comments are the ones that make you my target.
Your right this is an exaggeration good job! that but he still immediately went after lurkers when he ran out of scum reads which isn't towny at all.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia