In post 424, Radja wrote:His read development on Phoenix looks pretty logical to me. He pressured him until 67, after which he disengaged, telling that he would reassess him in 85. When Phoenix unvotes in 136, he calls him out on it in 155 and votes him again in 187. He then moves on to comment on beeboy and then starts pressuring Phoenix again. Phoenix is still my biggest scumread, so I don't have a problem with that at all.
When you say logical. How do you mean? And how is that alignment indicative again?
I mean sure cakes has an uncontradicted trail of his read progression on Phoenix. Does that automatically make it genuine?
He starts with a slight push on him and then an almost immediate back down.
Which sorta leaves me curious about what in that exchange looked so town from PW to him to just all but disengage from the exchange.
Later, I pursue the push and he decides to coattails it.
What's unfakable about that? Cakes have a terrible scumgame or something?
What are your thoughts on the points I made earlier?