In post 569, SirCakez wrote:Sensei what are your reads looking like right now?
You know, just for asking me this while I was in the middle of giving reads. Don't think I'm gonna give any more. : p
In post 569, SirCakez wrote:Sensei what are your reads looking like right now?
In post 568, Phoenix Wright wrote:In post 558, Xkfyu wrote:In post 460, Phoenix Wright wrote:And those last 3 points of yours happened after you said you'd write your case against me. So if they hadn't happened, you would only have one point for why you think I'm scum? Lol
This is a good point, and makes me feel like Cakez's scum read was fake to begin with.
UNVOTE: beeboy
VOTE: SirCakez
UNVOTE: This doesn't feel right. You just happened to show up after we started mentioning you again? And then you just jump right onto the current biggest wagon? I don't like it...
In post 574, clearance only wrote:In post 558, Xkfyu wrote:In post 460, Phoenix Wright wrote:And those last 3 points of yours happened after you said you'd write your case against me. So if they hadn't happened, you would only have one point for why you think I'm scum? Lol
This is a good point, and makes me feel like Cakez's scum read was fake to begin with.
UNVOTE: beeboy
VOTE: SirCakez
Am I crazy or does this look like bussing?
In post 580, SirCakez wrote:Bakers what do you think of Xkfyu?
Just because I have a low post count, doesn't mean I'm lurking. I've covered most issues whenever I make a new post. Not all of us sit at our computer and wait to have active conversations.In post 579, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog ... lurking.
In post 583, Toogeloo wrote:I'm still waiting for you to explain this gut scum read to me Titus.
Unvote;
Vote: SirCakez
In post 584, Toogeloo wrote:Just because I have a low post count, doesn't mean I'm lurking. I've covered most issues whenever I make a new post. Not all of us sit at our computer and wait to have active conversations.In post 579, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog ... lurking.
In post 586, Cookie Bakers wrote:In post 584, Toogeloo wrote:Just because I have a low post count, doesn't mean I'm lurking. I've covered most issues whenever I make a new post. Not all of us sit at our computer and wait to have active conversations.In post 579, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog ... lurking.
Really, you've covered the issues? You're not getting upset when town get wagoned.
You've said Clevage was "trying too hard" when pushing a Phoenix wagon. You know where I usually see this, scum trying to silence town leaders.
You spent a lot of energy attacking Phoenix's wagon, but you never outright state Phoenix is town.
You're just attacking leadership and lurking your way through this.
Even your last vote on Cakey doesn't explain what you dislike about him.
You jumped on beeboy. Uber sheepage.
So I ask you, where's your spine on your reads? The town toog I know has one. Scum toog just makes sure to "comment" on what he feels is important.
~Titus
In post 586, Cookie Bakers wrote:In post 584, Toogeloo wrote:Just because I have a low post count, doesn't mean I'm lurking. I've covered most issues whenever I make a new post. Not all of us sit at our computer and wait to have active conversations.In post 579, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog ... lurking.
Really, you've covered the issues? You're not getting upset when town get wagoned.
You've said Clevage was "trying too hard" when pushing a Phoenix wagon. You know where I usually see this, scum trying to silence town leaders.
You spent a lot of energy attacking Phoenix's wagon, but you never outright state Phoenix is town.
You're just attacking leadership and lurking your way through this.
Even your last vote on Cakey doesn't explain what you dislike about him.
You jumped on beeboy. Uber sheepage.
So I ask you, where's your spine on your reads? The town toog I know has one. Scum toog just makes sure to "comment" on what he feels is important.
~Titus
In post 216, Toogeloo wrote:Would you be happier if we gave percentages on our reads? Like, I don't know how anyone else can't see it, but Phoenix is like 97.452% town. That gives me 2.548% of being wrong I guess.In post 213, SirCakez wrote:This is partially true, but scum will put themselves in the spotlight to get mislynches on occasion. A game I just finished, Open 623, had a prime example of this. We all just wrote off a deathtunneler as town and they ended being scum. So just because he's hard pushing doesn't clear them 100% of being scum.
In post 589, Toogeloo wrote:I also don't have a town read on Phoenix, hence the reason I've never called him town.
In post 588, Cookie Bakers wrote:If Toog was #rekt, where is your vote?
In post 589, Toogeloo wrote:In post 586, Cookie Bakers wrote:In post 584, Toogeloo wrote:Just because I have a low post count, doesn't mean I'm lurking. I've covered most issues whenever I make a new post. Not all of us sit at our computer and wait to have active conversations.In post 579, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog ... lurking.
Really, you've covered the issues? You're not getting upset when town get wagoned.
You've said Clevage was "trying too hard" when pushing a Phoenix wagon. You know where I usually see this, scum trying to silence town leaders.
You spent a lot of energy attacking Phoenix's wagon, but you never outright state Phoenix is town.
You're just attacking leadership and lurking your way through this.
Even your last vote on Cakey doesn't explain what you dislike about him.
You jumped on beeboy. Uber sheepage.
So I ask you, where's your spine on your reads? The town toog I know has one. Scum toog just makes sure to "comment" on what he feels is important.
~Titus
I don't get upset about anything, typically, though I am known to get frustrated from time to time when it comes to obtuse behavior.
"Trying too hard" isn't how I'd describe it. I'd say it was more just a shit reason, voting someone because they didn't mesh with the rest of the RVS.
I also don't have a town read on Phoenix, hence the reason I've never called him town. I haven't called him scum either. I've never understood why people need to decisively clarify players that early in day 1. I reacted to the wagon on Phoenix and his response to the wagon, and responded to those. I also called out the player who was sideline jabbing and misrepping a player, and that was my first real read of the game for scum. I didn't sheep anyone, unless you want to argue that because I voted after Michael that I was a sheep then that's your prerogative.
What leadership am I bashing that is present in this game? If you mean cleavage, why am I now assisting them to Lynch Cakez?
It is a naked vote, and the only reason I have is that I am lending support to the wagon. I wouldn't even say I have a scum read on the slot. So yeah, guilty of sheeping, but not on the target you claim I was.
@Mod: this game was advertised only as being Role Madness. Role Madness was not listed in signups or opening post. Is the game still considered a Role Madness game, or has it changed since it's advertisement?
In post 167, Toogeloo wrote:You're trying too hard. He's an early train in RVS, and since it's still page 3 at this point, it's not as if any one could possibly not have a puzzled look on their face, especially since your reasoning is total shit for not following the appropriate flow of RVS. There's nothing to debunk considering the case is shit in the first place and just as random as the RVS stage in general is. I feel like his reaction is definitely appropriate considering that he's the first wagon of the game.
In post 593, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 588, Cookie Bakers wrote:If Toog was #rekt, where is your vote?
On cakey cause they ask me weird questions obviously.