Mini 1769: Ice Cream Mafia - Game over!

[SirCakez]

Thor665 will be replacing mn! Please welcome him.

GuyFawkes has been prodded.

[GuyFawkes]

prod received

GalFawkes had me occupied most of the weekend. My apologies

[popsofctown]

VOTE: Golden Robster

[GuyFawkes]

Keyser, do you remember coming up with an "orgy of evidence" against Kain Tepes? or calling him the easiest lynch you've ever seen? and stating that he will be today's lynch?

'cause if that's how you talk about your null reads I can't wait to see what you say about scum

[Thor665]

Greetings all.

I'm already on the biggest wagon, so no need to move my vote.

Other than that, what's up in this game?

Keyser Soze (3) - mn, GuyFawkes, BlueBloodedToffee
OceanWind (2) - Golden Robster, KainTepes
mn (2) - massive, popsofctown
GuyFawkes (2) - OceanWind, TellTaleHeart
Phoenix Wright (1) - Slandaar
KainTepes (1) - Aquanim

Not voting (2) - Keyser Soze, Boonskies

------------------

@Keyser
@Boon

We're, oh, 20+ pages into this game. Why no vote in play yet? Do you lack reads or...?

@Aquanim
@Slandaar

Your wagons are small compared to others - what makes them worth existing at this stage? You should talk about them more if they're interesting. if they're not interesting why not help me put Keyser to L-1 to force a claim? That could be a bit more entertaining and give us something new to debate also.

[Slandaar]

Your wagons are small compared to others - what makes them worth existing at this stage?

It makes me happy.

[Slandaar]

To me, this is a slot that never got started. I cannot see no real drive/earnest endeavor to sort people.

Why this slot and not Phoenix?

[Thor665]

That's an incredibly weak reason, and though a funny answer - I think that by dint of resorting to humor you are kind of admitting that your wagon is, at the moment, a bit laughable.
Are you planning to do anything to make it more serious, or is your goal on Day 1 just to dork around, seem light hearted, and try to drift by without taking a serious stance?
Or is there some other aspect of your play that I'm missing, and if so - what is it?

[Slandaar]

I am glad I amused you. Until I decide who I want lynched today I don't really see any need to move it.

[Thor665]

So in 20+ pages you literally have no real preference of who is lynched?

That seems unlikely or screwed up.

Clarify?

[Ircher]

UNVOTE:

[Boonskiies]

I replaced in a few days ago, Thor. Still not caught up yet, and my scum read is Keyser.

[Boonskiies]

Meh. Why not?

VOTE: Keyser

If I'm the wagon, you guys don't have to worry about me hammering.

[Boonskiies]

Thor, please town up that slot...haha.

[Thor665]

I replaced in a few days ago, Thor. Still not caught up yet, and my scum read is Keyser.

If he's a scum read, why not vote him - it would only put him on, what, L-4? That's certainly within acceptable pressure grounds, is there a reason you prefer not to?
Also, how much longer till you're caught up enough to be willing to place a vote? You replaced in three days ago with 20 pages - about how many do you read in a day?

Contented.

[Slandaar]

So in 20+ pages you literally have no real preference of who is lynched?

That seems unlikely or screwed up.

Clarify?

Preference and decision are not the same thing. I have preferences but have not decided.

[Ircher]

Let's not lynch until everyone has caught up, pls & ty.

[Thor665]

So your strongest preference is a single vote wagon that you are not actively pushing?



As long as your vote is doing nothing - do you have a *disagreement* with pushing a wagon to L-2/-1 to generate discourse and stronger reactions?
If no, sheep me.
If yes...could you point the way to someone you'd *like* to push to L-2/-1 to generate discourse and state your reasons for that and maybe I'll sheep you?

The current sideline play from you is abhorrent to me.

[Thor665]

Let's not lynch until everyone has caught up, pls & ty.

What does lynching have to do with L-1 and a claim exactly?

Also, if people want to be caught up before a lynch, they should get caught up.

[massive]

Thor, I know you and I have played in at least one game previously, although I don't remember what alignment either of us was. Is your general playstyle "run up to L-1 and force claim?" I seem to remember you being more reliant on the question / answer back-and-forth.

[Thor665]

I would consider both of those to be my playstyle and both of them to be in existence, clearly, within this game already.

What makes you think I have not been asking questions and seeking responses since, literally, 4 of my last 5 posts have questions in them directed at a variety of people.
And the only one that doesn't has a question struck out as it was answered while I was typing.

[Slandaar]

So your strongest preference is a single vote wagon that you are not actively pushing?

I did not say my preferences are super strong hence I am deciding and not really trying to lynch someone yet.

As long as your vote is doing nothing - do you have a *disagreement* with pushing a wagon to L-2/-1 to generate discourse and stronger reactions?
If no, sheep me.
If yes...could you point the way to someone you'd *like* to push to L-2/-1 to generate discourse and state your reasons for that and maybe I'll sheep you?

You are saying the same thing here. If I have a disagreement with doing X then I should suggest someone to do X to?

Thorsie

I said I have not decided.

The current sideline play from you is abhorrent to me.

It's pretty standard from me on D1.

I understand you are trying to engage in the game but maybe try reading the thread and then we can have a discussion about something more meaningful.

[Aquanim]

@Aquanim

Your wagons are small compared to others - what makes them worth existing at this stage? You should talk about them more if they're interesting.

What is your read on KainTepes?

if they're not interesting why not help me put Keyser to L-1 to force a claim? That could be a bit more entertaining and give us something new to debate also.

I think Keyser's probably town.

[Keyser Söze]

if they're not interesting why not help me put Keyser to L-1 to force a claim? That could be a bit more entertaining and give us something new to debate also.

I agree that wagons are useful information reference points but your vote-motivation to "force a claim" is

anti-town

. But thanks for being honest

Let's not lynch until everyone has caught up, pls & ty.

I do not understand

why L-1/lynching/claiming is even being discussed right now...

[Thor665]

I did not say my preferences are super strong hence I am deciding and not really trying to lynch someone yet.

Dude, 20+ pages in - you should at least be pushing on the strongest of your weak scum reads or sheeping the strongest of your weak town reads at this point because you're clearly still farming for reactions and haven't gotten enough yet.
Which, again, beggers the issue of the lack of pushing from you - I grok that you want/need more info (or are claiming you do) what I fail to see is you doing anything to get info, I see you trying to avoid making a stand, and that makes you harder to read and strikes me as defensive pro-scum play.

You are saying the same thing here. If I have a disagreement with doing X then I should suggest someone to do X to?

You are not expressing a disagreement with my push nor clarifying a reason for your push.

Slandaarina :{

It's pretty standard from me on D1.

Does that make it good play, or just consistent play?

I understand you are trying to engage in the game but maybe try reading the thread and then we can have a discussion about something more meaningful.

Like what?