In post 1039, Nahdia wrote:and insisting Cookies was bluffing about the dayvig is dumb and, in your case, bad. Even if he is, you kind of seemed like you were jsut trying to dispel what should be a good thing. if it's a reaction test or whatever, why not let it play out? what value is there in calling the bluff?
I agree. So why aren't you voting Ari?
Because I don't scumread them and don't buy into the whole "let's murder the lurker" ideology. I want them to produce content naturally rather than be forced to instantly claim.
What is silly is citing "tonal" so that you don't have to back it up with anything.[/quote]
Agreed.
Dave and Nahdia are sitting here whining about putting Ari at L minus 1 and not casing their mislynches.[/quote]You're a real piece of shit sometimes you know, Titus? You say this like we haven't said anything about beeboy. We have. Use basic fucking reading skills rather than acting like you are some sort of unquestionable mafia deity.
Nahdia wrote:(There's another one of those "lol" posts)
What is silly is citing "tonal" so that you don't have to back it up with anything.
Agreed.
Dave and Nahdia are sitting here whining about putting Ari at L minus 1 and not casing their mislynches.
You're a real piece of shit sometimes you know, Titus? You say this like we haven't said anything about beeboy. We have. Use basic fucking reading skills rather than acting like you are some sort of unquestionable mafia deity.
In post 1037, Nahdia wrote:@Xykfu A lot of your posts are really passive and you seem to be poking around for a lot of information but you never do anything with any of it. All of your votes have been easy.
You should probably check your own ISO, if you're looking for easy votes. See, I hadn't forgotten about you being in the game and, as it turns out, I checked your ISO just last night.
In post 1034, Nahdia wrote:I skimmed it, yeah. I said it was tonal so asking me to pick out specific posts is silly.
What a read reaction to a scumread lol.
(There's another one of those "lol" posts)
What is silly is citing "tonal" so that you don't have to back it up with anything.
(meant to say weird reaction)
I backed it up a bit but you're asking me for something I don't have. I don't delve into super deep logic and pick part individual letters of individual posts. That just ain't my style, sorry homes~
@Davsto, Your tone is matching the frustration you had at being caught for the wrong reasons in NY 191. I was a shit player there tunnelling town while the rest of the town was just terrible.
Nahdia wrote:[something i can't remember and is irrelevant]
(There's another one of those "lol" posts)
What is silly is citing "tonal" so that you don't have to back it up with anything.
Agreed.
Dave and Nahdia are sitting here whining about putting Ari at L minus 1 and not casing their mislynches.
You're a real piece of shit sometimes you know, Titus? You say this like we haven't said anything about beeboy. We have. Use basic fucking reading skills rather than acting like you are some sort of unquestionable mafia deity.
and now im actually producing content and discussing my thoughts because friggin' Cookies has a goddamn gun and has suggested they scumread me so boohoo. rest in peace day 1 cruise control
In post 1062, Nahdia wrote:and now im actually producing content and discussing my thoughts because friggin' Cookies has a goddamn gun and has suggested they scumread me so boohoo. rest in peace day 1 cruise control
In post 1039, Nahdia wrote:and insisting Cookies was bluffing about the dayvig is dumb and, in your case, bad. Even if he is, you kind of seemed like you were jsut trying to dispel what should be a good thing. if it's a reaction test or whatever, why not let it play out? what value is there in calling the bluff?
Why was it bad in my case specifically?
I called them out for bluffing because the forced early claim on Toog concerned me. I thought that maybe they were scum fishing for PRs. I asked them questions, they answered, and I believed them.
Toog is still calling their bluff, though. You going to be voting him sometime soon too?
In post 1059, Cookie Bakers wrote:@Davsto, Your tone is matching the frustration you had at being caught for the wrong reasons in NY 191. I was a shit player there tunnelling town while the rest of the town was just terrible.
Uhh, that's because I
was
genuinely frustrated there. Compare that game to how I was in Netherspite's SORM II - same kind of anger. I don't fake emotions as scum. I can't fake emotions. I'm shit at that.
If I'm frustrated, I'm fucking frustrated, and I'm the same frustrated as scum or as town, and it's because someone is pissing me off. And not pissing me off by correctly scumreading me, but being pissed off because they're being a real shitty player who can't play for shit and talks out of their arse but acts like they are the queen of all mafia.
Xkfyu: "I READ UR ISO LAST NITE M8 I GOT U NUMBERED"
aight pal u gonna do anything about that? this is exactly what im talking about. you're poking around for info and trying to make it look like you're hunting but you're not actually doing anything lol. if ur just gonna sit back and let the tryhards tryhard like me, be up front about it.
P-Edit: It was bad because you weren't the one with the gun pointed at you. Toog was fine and being flippant and angry and that could be scum or town but calling the bluff specifically wasn't poor in their case. And Cookies obviously wasn't PR fishing since they pointed the gun at the person who had already softclaimed VT lmao.
it's not a double standard lol i'm just talking about him now. i haven't really looked at Dav's ISO lately so idk what his deal was but the way Xkfyu went about it was bad imo.
In post 1058, Nahdia wrote:Yeah I have been making easy votes cause I've been coasting lol what's your point? i haven't made an effort to appear like I'm doing otherwise.
If you read my ISO why didn't you say anything about it.
Because I didn't have that much of a problem with it. Certainly not as much as my two biggest scum reads, Cakez and beeboy, and I didn't think it warranted a vig. So, I just didn't care. That is, until you started being a hypocrite.
In post 964, Cookie Bakers wrote:Like toog even told us to shoot Ari, who is potentially the worst person to shoot cause of the zero associations.
I've been telling you to shoot literally anyone, I only mentioned 3 names that I thought would be your highest priorities (Me, Ari, PW), and I've probed you about shooting the majority consensus even if it was a town read, to which you guys said no (which is counter to what you are telling everyone you'd do with your vig shot regardless).
