In post 780, Dream Man wrote:In post 735, Klingoncelt wrote:Raskolnikov and Beeboy have proven to be Scum as well, by virtue of their naked votes.
Hello Klingoncelt. I see your points with regard to Elsa and Anna, and your allegations that they are lying.
Would you like to discuss how Raskolnikov and Beeboy are scum? I certainly do not see them both being scum with kelbris, given how they had voted for him yesterday.
Do naked votes necessarily mean that someone is scum?
Looking forward to hearing you from you soon,
Dream Man
I've been getting bad vibes from Raskolnikov all along. His naked vote on me in post 373, and again a mention of me with no mention of a case in post 415 didn't exactly warm me to him.
Beeboy does basically the same thing, naked vote with no case, posts 729 and 733.
In fact, no one here has made anything remotely resembling a case against me.
So why the votes?
I did ask/demand an explanation, here it is all sorts of time later, and not a single one of my voters has tried to present a case.
The wordpuke Shos did in post 776 is utterly meaningless as it has no basis in reality.
So, someone make a case on me being Scum.
Someone make a case on those building my wagon as Town.