Here, you claimed you track and watch at the same time.
In post 1815, CatDog wrote: In post 1813, Brian Skies wrote:That does look like they're crumbling knowledge, which they've just now back pedaled away from.
tammy visited no one / no one visited her
ergo, we think town.
Here, you claimed no one targeted tammy and she didnt target anyone. (Which doesn't really match you earlier claim that you had role info that tammy was town but never mind that for now.)
Then you changed your claim here when counterclaimed
In post 1849, CatDog wrote:our result comes in a way that makes it unclear whether she was commuted/didn't visit anyone
its not a counterclaim
Suddenly you are not claiming watcher and have no idea if someone targeted her or not.
quote="In
post 1856, CatDog"]tl;dr, it could have been she didn't go anywhere or roleblocked.
I think most likely situation all around is brian is truthful + tammy got nightkilled[/quote]
And this makes even less sense; if you are a watcher and you targeted her you should know if someone targeted her to try to kill her.
So it seemed you had totally dropped the watcher part of your claim. Now suddenly it's back.
So no, I am not stupid. You are the one who made a fake claim, screwed it up, got caught, and are now trying to muddle your way through by lashing out and insulting people. It is not going to work; being a jerk to the rest of is not going to save you today, try something else.
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
