In 813 Postie said "Oh, and, I'm inclined to agree with Antihero that Almost50's death was a vigkill, which means Antihero was probably scum's target last night."
In 890 Antihero said "postie seems.... smart. why would she think it was a good idea to kill almost50?"
In post 32, Almost50 wrote:In 813 Postie said "Oh, and, I'm inclined to agree with Antihero that Almost50's death was a vigkill, which means Antihero was probably scum's target last night."
In 890 Antihero said "postie seems.... smart. why would she think it was a good idea to kill almost50?"
Claiming ANYTHING but VT = Auto Lynch. The two flipped goons mean just one scum PR at best (could even be a 3rd good vs a town of VTs + Macho Tracker & that's it). The RB is a powerful role, so it can't be Tracker + RB for town.
But the questions is: Do you guys understand the "Macho" modifier right? Bc I've seem some players who confused it with BulletProof, and that's the only expl○7nation I"ve got for not shooting FA for 2 nights.
No we understood it alright. We were just dumb enough to think we could keep an unroleblocked tracker alive and have nothing go wrong. At least, that's what happened on night 1.
Night 2 lovelygiant went AWOL and I have no idea what the remaining scum was doing. Either they forgot to use their roleblock or they didn't want FA to find out we have a roleblocker and tell everyone.
In post 34, Postie wrote:In post 32, Almost50 wrote:
In 813 Postie said "Oh, and, I'm inclined to agree with Antihero that Almost50's death was a vigkill, which means Antihero was probably scum's target last night."
In 890 Antihero said "postie seems.... smart. why would she think it was a good idea to kill almost50?"
I think that makes him pretty much her partner.
I'm not sure I understand your reasoning.
The why would "she think" part hints it was your decision, not the team as whole, which you did kind of implied here yourself when you said it was you who thought I might be a vig.
So I wnet back to see if you said anything about it, and there it was. He tried to shed doubts about whom it was who killed me and you jumped on it. I mean, how -on earth- do assume a vig kill when there's no other kill? Assuming a vig kill leads to assuming there's a doctor, which leads to more astray assumptions about the setup. The natural thing to assume when there's only one kill is we do NOT have a vig, or -if we do- they didn't shoot anyone bc they're not sure.
In post 42, Almost50 wrote:
The why would "she think" part hints it was your decision, not the team as whole, which you did kind of implied here yourself when you said it was you who thought I might be a vig.
Oh, I see what you're saying. I'm not sure that that's what Anti meant though. If it was someone else's decision you could say that I thought it was a good idea too, because otherwise I wouldn't have gone along with it.
Can I nominate like this entire game for Kodak Moment when this finishes? Is that possible? Because it totally should be.
Or maybe Most Enjoyable Game. 10/10 would lose(/win???) like this again.
In post 47, Postie wrote:Can I nominate like this entire game for Kodak Moment when this finishes? Is that possible? Because it totally should be.
Or maybe Most Enjoyable Game. 10/10 would lose(/win???) like this again.
In post 937, chilledtea wrote:Also I claimed right away because I wanted to be there before Dierfire. He could have known he got blocked and then claim to be a doctor or something.
i lold
Please welcome Dierfire to the deadthread!
EDIT: The good thing about all this for me is that I don't have to worry about prods - all the days are ending inside 48 hours...
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
