Trying to get into the game still mayhap?In post 174, Killthestory wrote:No definitive stances, on scumreads, very passive, not contributing at all.
In post 53, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:
Those two adjectives apply to two different things.
I think it's ridiculous to want to lynch someone for not having an avatar, and I think that the justification of "well they know the effect it can have because they've been around so long so it's clearly malicious" is a bit fishy.
You said your vote on me was 'not very RVS,' can you clarify why?
In post 161, Katsuki wrote:Lynch Thur, he will flip scum and so will KTS.
In post 57, DeathRowKitty wrote:I'm actually a bit suspicious of iraonavp for this bizarre justification of their vote. It *looks* like the kind of thing one would bring up while conf-biased and yet it's the reasoning he's giving forinitiallyfinding someone scummy.
In post 88, Ircher wrote:In post 78, DeathRowKitty wrote:There were 50 posts between that post and your previous, some of which contained real votes and one of which contained a miller claim. Do you not have opinions on any of it?
Not now, maybe later.
Alright, maybe a little -- The miller claim seemed strange, but nothing to do about it right now.
In post 122, Aristophanes wrote:Who is the miller? Do we lynch them D2 if they are not vigged? (Protip: the correct answer is "yes")
In post 160, Killthestory wrote:Thurhame is town. Snarky is scum. Camn is VI Town. Katsuki is VI Town or scum, leaning scum. Aristo is most likely town.
This game was too easy.
In post 184, iraonavp wrote:In post 160, Killthestory wrote:Thurhame is town. Snarky is scum. Camn is VI Town. Katsuki is VI Town or scum, leaning scum. Aristo is most likely town.
This game was too easy.
Then stop voting Thurhame.
In post 180, iraonavp wrote:In post 161, Katsuki wrote:Lynch Thur, he will flip scum and so will KTS.
You suck. I don't trust you at all.
In post 103, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:UNVOTE: camn
VOTE: duppin
duppin needs to talk more, so vote. This is the most I've seen of them:
In post 59, duppin wrote:I'm not sure I believe the miller claim. I think it's a pretty silly play as scum but on the other hand if you do intend to claim miller you have to do it early on so yeah.
In post 37, Thurhame wrote:Why shouldn't he be?
We're passed the RVS stage. What's your opinion on things such as the Kitty wagon, camn's stance on lurkers, Almost50's wagon-for-wagon's-sake, my opinion of Aristo, or iraonavp's complete abscense?
Weird response to obvious fluff. Honestly most of your posts sound like scum fishing for town credit.
VOTE: Thurthame
I'd like to do this for now.
I don't like the first couple sentences, especially. It says nothing while attempting to appear to have an opinion on something. "I don't believe it but it would be silly as scum but it makes sense if he's telling the truth" makes my head spin. Attempting to have an opinion on something while not actually committing one way or another is a scumtell in my book.
In post 105, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:In post 104, RadiantCowbells wrote:erqafsd
I bow to your wisdom.
In post 119, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:In post 110, duppin wrote:Spoiler: My Quote
What is this even supposed to mean?
I don't know if I believe the miller claim, it's fairly simple. I think it is possible he is the miller, but it could definitely be a scum play as well. That is not the same thing as not commiting and that's a really silly statement from you. I simply shared my opinion on the miller claim, something which you (oh the irony) did not, so I'd actually like to what you think about it.
In any case I'm okay with my current vote.
@Thurhame, can you explain your read on camn?
I understand your position, it's just that I always find it suspicious when someone states a non-position (I'm not sure if I believe it = healthy suspicion, but not confidence one way or the other) and justifies it with easily extrapolated information that doesn't suggest too much one way or the other (It's what a miller would do if claiming early, but could also be a scum play) is more likely scum than those who don't.
There's nothing wrong with sharing your opinion. In fact, sharing opinions is great, and you should do it more! Which is why I voted for you, since I wanted more activity from you. Fire under the heels, and the like.
I don't think it's ironic that I haven't shared my opinion on the miller claim. My criticism of the way you phrased your opinion versus my having one or not isn't ironically related. You could make a case that it's hypocritical, but I'd maintain that it isn't.
My opinion on the miller claim, if you'd like to know, is complete apathy. A miller claim on its own means nothing. More interested in ira's complete lack of doing anything interesting, and totally unexplained vote on me.
In post 180, iraonavp wrote:In post 161, Katsuki wrote:Lynch Thur, he will flip scum and so will KTS.
You suck. I don't trust you at all.
In post 188, Katsuki wrote:BEST SCUM PERFORMANCE
In post 197, Killthestory wrote:I bet quite a few Iraon. It's easy to push a mislynch, and then use WIFOM city to defend yourself. Although I don't feel like it's the case with Katsuki since they're most likely misguided town, it could be a thing.
In post 198, iraonavp wrote:In post 197, Killthestory wrote:I bet quite a few Iraon. It's easy to push a mislynch, and then use WIFOM city to defend yourself. Although I don't feel like it's the case with Katsuki since they're most likely misguided town, it could be a thing.
Why do you think they're most likely misguided town? If I were town in your position, I don't think I'd be able to tell the difference.