In post 1220, Jake from State Farm wrote:with no case
oh come on, I've given reasons for farmer. Find something else to spam over and over
In post 1220, Jake from State Farm wrote:with no case
In post 1225, Wisdom wrote:In post 1220, Jake from State Farm wrote:with no case
oh come on, I've given reasons for farmer. Find something else to spam over and over
In post 1220, Jake from State Farm wrote:Yet another person you try to lynch, with no case and nobody really following you except a couple of sheep.
Color me shocked
In post 1227, Wisdom wrote:I've said way more than that but you're not reading
In post 1229, SnarkySnowman wrote:In post 1220, Jake from State Farm wrote:Yet another person you try to lynch, with no case and nobody really following you except a couple of sheep.
Color me shocked
No case seems to be the only way you know how to say "I disagree"
In post 1230, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1227, Wisdom wrote:I've said way more than that but you're not reading
I went through your iso and that's basically it for reasons on why farmer is scum.
In post 1177, a plain farmer wrote:Those getting cold feet about the Snarky wagon should make sure they've considered this.
In post 1232, SnarkySnowman wrote:
In post 1235, Wisdom wrote:In post 1177, a plain farmer wrote:Those getting cold feet about the Snarky wagon should make sure they've considered this.
Or how this was manipulative as fuck
In post 1233, Wisdom wrote:In post 1230, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1227, Wisdom wrote:I've said way more than that but you're not reading
I went through your iso and that's basically it for reasons on why farmer is scum.
Because all I explained about how his push on Snarky is forced is inexistent
In post 1238, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1233, Wisdom wrote:In post 1230, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1227, Wisdom wrote:I've said way more than that but you're not reading
I went through your iso and that's basically it for reasons on why farmer is scum.
Because all I explained about how his push on Snarky is forced is inexistent
is that a typo because this post makes no sense
In post 1134, Wisdom wrote:farmer's "case" on him is a forced pile of bullshit
In post 1113, Wisdom wrote:And don't argue "he tried to fish a claim" because I'll laugh at you
In post 1242, Wisdom wrote:I already explained exactly why it was forced, so yeah. You apparently didn't really go through my ISO as you are claiming - too bad I am not you, because by your logic you just lied and it 100% means you are scum.
Whether you disagree or not, that was manipulation.
In post 998, Wisdom wrote:Snarky really looks like scum, his push on Maestro is really forced
In post 1244, Wisdom wrote:As already explained, farmer is pushing things that are not scummy, but odd. Like Snarky's L-4 claim request, his SK comment, and so on. It's a forced case on lynchbait.